May 18th 2002


  Buy Issue 2633
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: U.S. Farm Bill ends free trade illusion

EDITORIAL: Paid maternity leave: who benefits?

Languishing Labor fills its quota

East Timor becomes independent on May 20

Straws in the Wind: Le System / Apocrypha: Dave's lost column / Ides of March / Sin

LAW: US repudiates International Criminal Court

MEDIA: Jonestown

Refugee response (letter)

Middle East (letter)

Swift solution (letter)

Neighbourly aid (letter)

Quarantine: NZ suspends California grape imports

HEALTH: The politics of AIDS in South Africa

OPINION: Media diversity: should the market decide?

TRADE: Oxfam report shows rigged rules of world trade

ASIA: Taiwan comes in from the cold

Books promotion page

COVER STORY: U.S. Farm Bill ends free trade illusion

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, May 18, 2002


While Australia continues to pursue the policies of deregulation and free trade, US President Bush has declared that US agriculture is a strategic industry. His statement was made to justify the latest, massive $200 billion Farm Bill for the next six years.

President Bush announced in January that US self-sufficiency in food is a "national security" issue. He said:

"One of the things about America is that we're self-sufficient in food. It's a national security interest to be self-sufficient in food. It's a luxury that you've always taken for granted here in this country" (Australian Financial Review, January 17, 2001)

New Bill

US congressional negotiators recently agreed to the new Farm Bill. It will be worth about $33 billion a year to US farmers, $14 billion per annum above current farm subsidy levels. It is yet to be ratified by the White House.

According to Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2000, in 1999 the average farm subsidy as a percentage of total farm income was 6 per cent for Australian farmers, 24 per cent for US farmers, 49 per cent in the EU and 65 per cent in Japan.

The new US subsidies are going to be applied in various ways - in reviving target prices for crops, generous loan programs covering new sectors of agriculture and more support payments to cotton rice, corn, wheat and soybean farmers.

There will also be a tax on dairy imports to fund research and development for US dairy farmers and compulsory country of origin labelling for imported fish, meat, fruit and vegetables.

About $4 billion will be made as conservation payments to farmers.

Agriculture Minister, Warren Truss, has said that Australia "will not hesitate to take [the US] to the World Trade Organisation if we find any inconsistency [with WTO rules]."

The WTO rules on agriculture are written full of loopholes to allow the developed nations to subsidise and protect their agricultural industries in the face of cheaper imports from low cost producers like Australia and the developing world.

The WTO rules were written by the US and the EU to allow a host of assistance packages to their farmers.

Annex II of The Uruguay Round Final Act: Agreement on Agriculture (the Uruguay round WTO agreement) is entitled, "Domestic Support: the basis for exemption from the reduction of commitments".

It allows for a host of Government programs like those in the US Farm Bill - environmental, research, advisory and marketing programs; direct payments for various reasons such as farmers suffering low incomes; income insurance and safety-net programs; crop insurance schemes and disaster relief programs; and structural adjustment programs etc.

Farmer response

The determination of the US to massively increase farm subsidies will send a signal to struggling US farmers to produce more so as to reduce their debts and improve their incomes. The effect will be to force prices down in both the US domestic market and in their export markets.

Notably, US-Australia moves for a free trade agreement have excluded agriculture.

Such an agreement would only marginally affect Australian manufacturing industries, as we have unilaterally made Australia a virtual free trade zone in manufactures. Except for motor vehicles, tariffs have been cut to five per cent. Our manufacturing sector is now one of the smallest of the advanced economies.

Meanwhile, the US substantially subsidises its manufacturers through tax concessions and government contracts.

However, a free trade arrangement could have a major impact on our service industries, banking, insurance, health and education.

  • Pat Byrne




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 3:01 pm