August 12th 2000
Articles from this issue:
Cover Story: In Vitro Fertilisation on demand?
Editorial: Will GST cut the black economy?
Canberra Observed: Whats behind the Carr for Canberra push?
Law: UN ruling used by local critics to hammer Howard Government
Economics: Washington Consensus risks derailment by grassroots opponents
The $7 Billion Minerals Grab: The fight for control of Australian mining
Family: Family-free family conference
Health: Health crisis obscured by ideology
Britain: Blairs Britain: where discrimination is anything his wife says it is
Straws in the Wind
Bioethics: Gene therapy business: the tragic case of Jesse GelsingerBooks promotion page
Cover Story: In Vitro Fertilisation on demand?
by News Weekly
News Weekly, August 12, 2000
Prime Minister John Howard has announced that his Government will move to amend the Sex Discrimination Act following its use to strike down Victorias restrictions on access to In Vitro Fertilisation. Such an amendment may have a difficult passage through the Senate given that the Federal ALP has indicated that a womans right to such technology be she married, single or lesbian always trumps a childs right to a mother and a father.
The Democrats response is predictable.
The Federal Government will try to reverse a ruling in the Federal Court to open up the Victorian IVF program to single women and lesbians and extend IVF availability in other states.
Mr Justice Ross Sundberg of the Federal Court ruled that the Federal Sex Discrimination Act rendered inoperative Victorias Infertility Treatment Act, which has restricted IVF to married couples and de facto heterosexual couples.
The ruling will affect Western Australia, which has similar clauses restricting IVFs availability. NSW, the ACT and Tasmania have no restrictions on IVF, while a recent test case in Queensland has opened up IVF to lesbian couples.
The Victorian law was challenged by a Melbourne IVF specialist, Dr John McBain, on behalf of one of his patients, Lisa Meldrum.
A single woman in her mid-thirties, Meldrum has spent eight years attempting to become pregnant through IVF programs interstate and overseas.
Although the case involved both State and Federal law, both the Federal and the Victorian governments chose to stay neutral in the case and did not contest the claim.
Consequently, the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (ACBC) successfully applied to become a friend of the court in order to plead in the interest of the child.
Following Judge Sundbergs ruling, Melbournes Archbishop George Pell said that the Federal Sex Discrimination Act was originally intended to stop unjust discrimination against people when, for example, they are applying for a job, housing, a bank loan or to buy a car.
But because it was drawn in such wide terms and without clear consideration for other important values such as the paramount interests of children, that same law now has an effect the Commonwealth never intended: it creates a right for single people.
Archbishop Pell disputed whether such a right existed ethically or in the international law on which the federal act is based. Indeed a very good case can be made that even if the Commonwealth Government wanted to create such a right which it clearly did not it would have no moral or constitutional power to do so.
The granting to any female adult the right to a child is one more example of the growing trend to treat children as commodities.
A person may have the right to own property but not the right to own another person.
Just as a man does not have the right to a woman, an adult does not have the right to a child. Parents are custodians of children, not the owners of children.
A child also has rights, including the right to know his/her biological heritage.
The Victorian law had protected the interest of the child by ensuring that IVF was restricted to married couples or long-term de facto heterosexual couples.
Such IVF children grow up knowing their biological parents. Their biological heritage is preserved.
The Federal Court ruling denies children this right as the donor sperm for single women and lesbian couples will most often be anonymous.
Some Victorian women have ordered sperm across the internet from American sperm banks and then travelled to NSW for their IVF treatment.
Justice Sundbergs decision sees the law abandon its protective interest in the child in favour of an adults right to have a child by IVF.
It means that children can be denied half of their identity and knowledge about their genetic and medical heritage.
In recent decades, the right of people who were adopted out as children to know their biological parents has come to be recognised.
Their need to know their biological roots often causes great anguish in their lives and considerable help is given to helping them find their biological parents.
Join e-newsletter list
Your cart has 0 items
EDITORIAL The future of Senator Cory Bernardi
EDITORIAL Nothing new among Trump's executive orders
EUTHANASIA Quebec, Dutch, Belgian and Oregon laws a 'mess'
COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump
QUEENSLAND Pro-life Brisbane marches as abortion vote nears
ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report
COVER STORY Free-trade policy sending manufacturing into free-fall
News and views from around the world
Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)
States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)
Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)
Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)
Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)
President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)
China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)
Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)
U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)
Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)