March 25th 2017


  Buy Issue 2992
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY Decentralisation: an undeveloped country

CANBERRA OBSERVED Millennials feel they've been left out in the cold

EDITORIAL Gas, power crises are due to renewables obsession by Peter Westmore

WESTERN AUSTRALIA Barnett election wipe-out delivers WA to Labor

MULTICULTURALISM First among equals or an also-ran culture?

WEST AUSTRALIAN LAW Domestic-violence laws disregard basic rights

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Fair Work Commission's disastrous penalty-rates decision

OPINION Trump-Russia allegations are smoke and mirrors

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Don't laugh: this is serious. Revival of Maoist play is a propaganda coup in Victoria

RURAL AFFAIRS Without new dams in the Basin, we're up the creek

CULTURAL HISTORY Pascal without pressure

OPINION Scope for regeneration as Me Generation shuffles off

MUSIC Dying for exposure

CINEMA Kong: Skull Island: Ape-ocalypse Now

BOOK REVIEW How maritime England lost America

Books promotion page

IN DEFENCE OF WAR

Nigel Biggar

$54.95


Buy Book
Qty:

(Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Hardcover: 384 pages
ISBN: 9780199672615
Price: AUD$54.95

 

Description

Pacifism is popular. Many hold that war is unnecessary, since peaceful means of resolving conflict are always available, if only we had the will to look for them. Or they believe that war is wicked, essentially involving hatred of the enemy and carelessness of human life. Or they posit the absolute right of innocent individuals not to be deliberately killed, making it impossible to justify war in practice.

Against the virus of wishful thinking, anti-military caricature, and the domination of moral deliberation by rights-talk In Defence of War asserts that belligerency can be morally justified, even while it is tragic and morally flawed.

Recovering the early Christian tradition of just war thinking, it argues in favour of aggressive war in punishment of grave injustice; that morality can justify military intervention even in transgression of positive international law (e.g., Kosovo); that love and the doctrine of double effect can survive combat; that the constraints of proportionality are sufficiently permissive to sanction Britain’s belligerency in 1914-18; and that the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was justified.

 

Features

• Provides a succinct account of the logic, strengths, and weaknesses of religious and non-religious pacifism.

• Reasserts the complex moral reasoning of the early Christian just war tradition from Augustine to Grotius against the exclusive rights-talk of liberal just war thinking.

• Explains how to order the use of the various criteria of just war, so as to produce a coherent final judgement.

• Includes painstaking analysis of the 2003 Iraq invasion, concluding that it was justified — on its 10th anniversary in 2013.

• Contains a moral analysis of Britain’s involvement in the First World War, concluding that it too was justified — on the eve of the centenary of its outbreak in 1914.

 

Contents

Introduction: Against the Virus of Wishful Thinking

1: Against Christian Pacifism

2: Love in War

3: The Principle of Double Effect: Can it Survive Combat?

4: Proportionality: Lessons from the Somme and the First World War

5: Against Legal Positivism and Liberal Individualism

6: On Not Always Giving the Devil Benefit of Law: Legality, Morality, and Kosovo

7: Constructing Judgement: The Case of Iraq

Conclusion

Bibliography

 

The author

Nigel Biggar is Regius Professor of Moral and Pastoral Theology, and director of the McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics and Public Life, at the University of Oxford, where he is also a Canon of Christ Church Cathedral. Before taking up his current post in 2007, he held chairs in theology at the University of Leeds and at Trinity College, Dublin. Among his published works are: Behaving in Public: How to Do Christian Ethics (2011), (co-ed.) Religious Voices in Public Places (2009), Aiming to Kill: The Ethics of Suicide and Euthanasia (2004); and (ed.) Burying the Past: Making Peace and Doing Justice after Civil Conflict (2001, 2003). He sits on the editorial advisory board of the Journal of Military Ethics and has lectured at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom.


Related Articles:
FIRST WORLD WAR Were we right to go to war in 1914?



























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY Don't grieve dumped TPP; rather, thank Trump

ENVIRONMENT U.S. Congress to investigate shonky climate report

ENVIRONMENT Ignore claims that Antarctic ice sheet will melt away

COVER STORY Money flows freely to fuel anti-coal campaign

EDITORIAL What future has Senator Cory Bernardi?

EDITORIAL Commission report demonstrates old saying about statistics

ELECTRICITY Green policies threaten energy security and jobs



News and views from around the world

Scientists criticise "hottest year on record" hype (James Varney)

States, territories slash school funding by $100 million (Stephanie Balogh)

Confirm Judge Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (Stephen Mosher)

Rescuing Governor Ahok (Bob Lowry)

Future shock: What happens when robots take our jobs? (Adam Creighton)

President Trump: Protect religious freedom (Ryan Anderson)

China to crack down further on "cult" activities (Ben Blanchard)

Polish president rules out gay marriage (Radio Poland)

U.S. state legislatures sign 334 laws in five years to restrict abortion (Micaiah Bilger)

Clinton, Trump and the politics of the English language (Ben Reinhard)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
June 20, 2015, 1:01 pm