March 9th 2002


  Buy Issue 2628
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

The Hollingworth Affair

Federal Cabinet decision on cloning

Media putsch overwhelms Governor-General

Will CHOGM bite the bullet, oust Mugabe?

Straws in the Wind: Rumpole arising

Environment: National parks are an unacceptable fire risk

Agriculture: Bar lowered on quarantine once again

Media: Crude but effective

Environmental optimism (letter)

Bias: in the eye of the beholder (letter)

Economics: Privatisation: the promise and the reality

Comment: Trust: a commodity in short supply

Culture: How the media exploits the US$150 billion American youth market

ASIA: WTO entry will put pressure on China-Taiwan ties

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:


Culture: How the media exploits the US$150 billion American youth market


by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, March 9, 2002


The need to pay off huge debts from mergers and takeovers, and to keep shareholders happy, is driving a sharp decline in media standards as the five US mega-media corporations compete for the largest and wealthiest youth market in history. Bill Muehlenberg explains.

An extremely revealing and disturbing television documentary was aired on America's Public Broadcasting System in February of last year. Entitled The Merchants of Cool, the show examined the way big business and the advertising industry have targeted our young people. More specifically, it explores the way youth culture is largely the creation of marketers, corporations and those interested in getting rich off youth through popular culture.

Although primarily discussing the American situation, the globalisation of youth culture means the findings are relevant to most of the world. Indeed, given the global reach of such icons of American popular culture as MTV, McDonald's and Coke, almost no culture is immune from its effect.

Money for the taking

The bottom line is that there is a huge amount of money involved in the youth culture. Consider some of the figures. In the US there are some 32 million teenagers, most with money to burn. Marketers know that this is the largest generation of teenagers ever, even larger than their Baby Boomer parents.

In 2000, American teenagers spent more than US$100 billion themselves and pushed their parents to spend another US$50 billion on top of that. They have more money and more say over how they'll spend it than ever before.

For the first time in human history, teenagers are growing up in a world made up of advertisers, marketers and corporate giants who are doing all they can do drain every last dollar out of the lucrative youth market. And they are succeeding.

As the presenter of the show, media critic Douglas Rushkoff, explained:

"For today's teens, a walk in the street may as well be a stroll through the mall. Anywhere they rest their eyes, they'll be exposed to a marketing message. A typical American teenager will process over 3,000 discrete advertisements in a single day, and 10 million by the time they're 18. Kids are also consuming massive quantities of entertainment media. Seventy-five percent of teens have a television in their room. A third have their own personal computer, where they spend an average of two hours a day on line."

Brian Graden, President of MTV Programming, notes the change that has taken place over the last 10 to 15 years. There is now a keen recognition of the power of the teen consumer:

"I think even five years ago, believe it or not, Madison Avenue would not really have recognised teens or even 18-to-24s as a viable consumer block on their own. I can remember a day when shows ... with humongous teen numbers or 18-to-24 numbers, like 'My So-Called Life' on ABC get cancelled because that's not viable. One of the great things about this information age is that with so many channels, you can say, 'My business is 12-to-15,' or 'My business is 21-to-24.' And you can make a business out of that, which is great.

"As a result, you have the most marketed group of teens and young adults ever in the history of the world. These consumers are so brand-savvy that they know exactly if they're being hyped to, if they're being marketed to. They can see right through an ad that is just empty hype. At the same time, they don't resent brands. If you're Levi's or Pepsi or one of these brands, that's okay, as long as you're cool. Probably ten years ago that wasn't the case."

Market research

The Merchants of Cool documents how corporations dish out millions of dollars to find out what is cool and what is not. The problem is, cool keeps changing, simply because kids keep changing. Just trying to keep up on the trends is a full time job for hundreds of researchers, consultants and marketers. The job of mapping cool, of pinning it down, is one of the main pursuits of corporate America today.

Experts are hired to inform corporations on what is hot and what is not. One consultant, for example, puts the results of her market research on an exclusive web site, charging corporations a $20,000 subscription fee to learn what the culture spies have discovered.

One problem, however, is whenever the culture vultures and marketing experts discover what is cool, it stops being cool! Cool changes. Madonna for example is old hat - she is not cool. And the corporations struggle to keep up with the rapid changes in cool.

Part of the way the corporate entertainment world deals with this problem is to not just map cool, but to create cool. This in fact has become much of the strategy of the merchants of cool - create cool, while claiming to simply be reflecting cool. Thus they are no longer selling a product, they are selling a lifestyle.

It becomes a "giant feedback loop" where the media, advertisers and large corporations present images to youth, which the youth culture in turn seeks to emulate and imitate. The media then sells it back to them.

This process is done in part by doing market research into what teens like, then repackaging and re-selling it back to them. For example, with teenage boys there is what is known as "mook". Mook is a caricature of what a typical trendy cool young male is supposed to be about. Marketers extensively interview young males to see what they wear, what they eat, what they buy, what they listen to, and so on, then repackage the results into a sellable commodity.

The mook then is a testoster0ne-laden lout who craves sex, violence and mindless entertainment. This is why wrestling is so popular, as are the countless teen films saturated with sex and violence. This is supposed to be what young males want, so the entertainment media force-feeds them on it in excess. The crudity and banality of South Park, Howard Stern and the recent "reality" shows (Temptation Island, Big Brother, etc.) are the results of the merchants of cool.

And, again, the whole aim of the exercise is about creating and maintaining demand. It is not a person that is targeted, but a consumer. It is not a human that is pitched to, but a customer. That is why the term is "market research", not people research or human research. The goal is to create and perpetuate a steady stream of "coolness". The aim is simply to create ever more products and services, convincing young people that they need them, that they will make them cool.

Communication Professor of New York University, Mark Crispin-Miller, says the merchants of cool listen to young people simply so they can sell to them. They capitalise on the flippancy and short-attention span of youth to hook them on entertainment and pleasure. If ancient Rome kept the masses in subjection by offering them bread and circuses, the merchants of cool hypnotise a generation by offering them pizza and rock concerts. More specifically, them offer them Sprite and Limp Biskit.

And if the bottom line is to make money, then to appeal to the crassest motive, to offer the most degrading product, and to rope in ever younger audiences is the order of the day. This in part explains the cultural decline so apparent everywhere. The entertainment industry deliberately reaches for the gutter to hook in as many young people (and their seemingly bottomless pocket books) as possible.

Thus teen culture is full of the worst examples of sex and violence run amok. The borders are continuously being pushed.

Entertainment that was once daring and radical quickly becomes blasé and boring. What was cool in March becomes uncool in April. To deal with the continual boredom and desensitisation, ever more shocking and controversial forms of entertainment have to be offered. So hate rappers like Eminem and shock-jocks like Howard Stern are offered in endless supply.

An example is Warner Brothers, a network which realised that the teen market was overflowing with sex and violence, so they decided a few years ago to offer an alternative - family-friendly viewing.

Shows like Seventh Heaven were produced and ran for a few years, but WB saw they couldn't compete with the other networks. So they dropped the family programming. Shows like Dawson's Creek were produced instead, which concentrated on sex and the fast life.

And children are always being targeted here. The teen sex and horror film I Knew What You Did Last Summer was test-marketed to 11 and 12 year olds! And shows like South Park (which the producers assured us was for adults only) have a whole range of spin-off products - e.g., toys and tee-shirts, specifically aimed at children.

Indeed, the marketing seems to always appeal to the lowest common denominator. For example, many of the pop stars of today are clothed (or unclothed) in such a way that 20 years ago they would have been called tarts. But today they are called role models.

Female pop stars, especially, are leading a downward trend which seems to show no sign of bottoming out. Rushkoff calls this the "midriff", the female version of "mook". It seems everywhere today.

Where did this trend arise? It came from the mass-marketed, stage-managed and ubiquitous pop stars, and their corporate creators.

Corporate domination

Another clear message of The Merchants of Cool is how a handful of powerful media and entertainment corporations calls the shots. Media giants like News Corp, Walt Disney, Viacom, Sony and AOL Time Warner make up the leading media-monopolies. Mark Crispin Miller, a media critic and the author of Boxed In: The Culture of TV, makes these incisive comments:

"When you've got a few gigantic transnational corporations, each one loaded down with debt, competing madly for as much shelf space and brain space as they can take, they are going to do whatever they think works the fastest and with the most people, which means that they will drag standards down.

"They're not going to be too nice about what they choose to do. They'll go directly for the please centre.

"They're going to try to get you watching and buying right away, and what this means is that they are going to do as much trash as they can, because that will grab people.

"The word 'trash' is old-fashioned, because this is a state-of-the-art, highly sophisticated venture that we're talking about. They're using all the most brilliant means of measurement and surveillance to figure out what we're all about. They focus group everything in a million ways. So we have a highly sophisticated enterprise that's engaged in a kind of regressive project. They're trying to sell as much junk as they can by appealing to the worst in all of us, but they do it by some extremely civilised means."

Robert McChesney, media critic and author of Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times, also explores this idea:

"The entertainment companies are a handful of massive conglomerates that own four of the five music companies that sell 90 percent of the music in the United States. Those same companies also own all the film studios, all the major TV networks, and pretty much all the TV stations in the ten largest markets. They own all or part of every single commercial cable channel. They look at the teen market as part of this massive empire that they're colonising.

"You should look at it like the British or the French empires in the nineteenth century. Teens are like Africa. There's this range that they're going to take over, and their weaponry is films, music, books, CDs, internet access, clothing, amusement parks, sports teams. That's all this weaponry they have to make money off of this market, to colonise this market. And that's exactly how they approach it. So they look at music as just one small part of it. They aren't music companies; they're moneymaking companies, and music is a weapon that generates money for them."

Ben H. Bagdikian, author of Media Monopoly, takes up this theme of the corporate entertainment industry:

"When one large firm controls all forms of the major media, it becomes the delight of Wall Street's love of 'synergy,' a combination of two or more forces that creates a result greater than the sum of the individual parts. Each part of such a firm feeds business to other parts of the same corporation."

The inevitable decline of culture

The shrinking world of media ownership in large measure explains the coarsening and cheapening of the media in general and popular entertainment in particular. As Bagdikian puts it, "The trend in violence and crudity has become contagious. Today in movies and mainstream TV, for example, 'comic effects' have been achieved by a teenager masturbating with a pie, a talk show host vomiting on air, and a character in a film drinking excrement. Talented scriptwriters are replaced by scripts so unfunny and tawdry that they would have been turned down by the greedy managers of pre-World War II New Jersey burlesque houses.

"For advertisers whose corporate goods are promoted by such acts, violence and sex are literally cheap, that is, less expensive than creative, original, artistic programming. The violence is cheaper than ever, thanks to modern computerized effects that can impose digital images of massive explosions and Armageddons of slaughter."

The decline of culture then is in large measure due to the nature of corporate entertainment. The Merchants of Cool highlights the dangers but does not offer any solutions. But it does perform the great service of enlightening us to the real world of the mega-media industry. What we do with that information is up to us.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm