March 23rd 2002

  Buy Issue 2629

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The US steel decision

Ansett's collapse highlights failure of deregulation

Government's currency gamble goes bad

Straws in the Wind: All you need is love / What's in a name?

NSW Anglican Bishops support stem cell research ... but not at the cost of human life

Media: Courageously un-PC / Sudden 'enthusiasm' for Crean

Captive market (letter)

Misdirected (letter)

US steel (letter)

Show trials (letter)

Adult stem cells: the better option

Comment: Enron's collapse - the net widens

ASIA: How should the West respond to the terrorist threat?

Books available from News Weekly Books

Books promotion page

survey link


steel (letter)

by Greg Byrne

News Weekly, March 23, 2002


George Bush has given the opponents of free trade the weapon they had been waiting for: proof that when it comes to the crunch the US is no less protectionist than anyone else and that countries like Australia practising free trade are on their own.

It would seem that the US steel industry is inefficient and that other nations are cheaper and better. So that Bush is protecting an industry that can't stand on its own two feet.

This is only putting off the evil day. Eventually US steel firms will be like Ansett crashing disastrously with many good people thrown on the scrap heap. There are many good steel plants around the world and eventually market forces will assert themselves and inefficient local plants whose only justification for existing is employment will go to the wall.

Like Australia the US is not much good at manufacturing except in the high tech areas where its new technology gives it the edge. But in footware, clothing, durables and automobiles expect plant closures. Let us remember that industrial plants exist to provide consumer goods, not jobs.

Australians are seeing themselves as the losers in this, which to some extent they are, but I would point out that American consumers are the losers, as are US firms which use steel as a raw material.

News Weekly will probably say that countries with industries like US steel are generating income and revenue while other nations that practise free trade are disadvantaged. However I would point out that eventually the final crash will be more disastrous. If steel companies provide expensive new plants and technology that will be more shareholders' money that will have to be written off.

With an industry like that (US Steel) you don't want to encourage the investment of scarce investment capital in an industry that can only sell its products locally and at low profit.

Greg Byrne,
Rowville, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse

News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm