June 29th 2002

  Buy Issue 2636

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Sexual misconduct in the Church

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Coalition MPs revolt against the ICC

New policies needed to rescue agriculture

COMMENT: How Ruddock could face charges before the ICC

Straws in the Wind: From the other side of the street / Dying culture

Sectarianism rears its ugly head in Victorian ALP

Census figures show decline of the family unit

Media ambush (letter)

Ancient wisdom (letter)

Reality cinema (letter)

Where the facts lie (letter)

Asylum seekers I (letter)

Asylum seekers II (letter)

Children as commodities (letter)

Who will stand up for small business, rural Australia?

OPINION: Reflections on the British monarchy

International terrorism: keeping the issues in focus

Despite tensions: Indonesia looks ahead

BOOKS: 'Undue Noise: Words and Music' by Andrew Ford

BOOKS: 'The Broken Hearth' by William Bennett

BOOKS: 'Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress' by Dai Sijie

COMMENT: That other Holocaust

Books promotion page

How Ruddock could face charges before the ICC

by Richard Egan

News Weekly, June 29, 2002
If Australia ratifies the Statute for the International Criminal Court, as it is being urged to do by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer, and enacts the two enabling bills prepared by Attorney General Daryl Williams, then immigration Minister Phillip Ruddock could well face extradition, trial and imprisonment by the International Criminal Court.

The suggestion by Justice Louis Joinet of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary detention, that the policy of mandatory detention of asylum seekers administered by Phillip Ruddock is breaching international human rights law, may be an embarrassment to Australia internationally but it is no real threat to our right to manage our own affairs.


However, if Australia were to ratify the Statute for the International Criminal Court, the prosecutor of the ICC may charge Phillip Ruddock with a crime against humanity under Article 7.1(e) of the Statute, which penalises those responsible for "imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law".

Under William's legislation, this crime would also be part of Commonwealth criminal law. However, Section 49 of the Australian Constitution would prevent the criminal prosecution in an Australian court of a Minister of the Crown administering an Act of the Commonwealth Parliament.

In the light of this constitutional obstacle the International Criminal Court could find that Australia was "unable or unwilling" to prosecute Mr Ruddock and issue an order for his arrest and extradition.

Under Mr Williams' International Criminal Court Bill 2001, every law enforcement official and magistrate in Australia, including Mr Williams himself as Attorney General, would be legally bound to give effect to such a request from the ICC.

If the Commonwealth Government reneged on our responsibilities to the ICC by refusing to comply with the extradition request, then Mr Ruddock would, for his own safety, have to remain in Australia.

If he travelled to any other nation that had ratified the ICC Statute he could be arrested and extradited to face trial before the ICC.


It is extraordinary that Mr Downer, Mr Williams and others are so critical of the adverse findings of a UN Committee that has no teeth, and yet are prepared to bind Australia and Australians, including Ministers of the Crown, as well as our defence force personnel, to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, which will have the power to impose terms of imprisonment up to life imprisonment.

Neither Mr Downer nor Mr Williams have explained why they are so confident that the ICC, whose judges will be elected by the same range of nations as those who elect the UN Human Rights Committee, is likely to be any more favourably disposed to Australia than that Committee has been in recent years.

  • Richard Egan

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am