July 13th 2002

  Buy Issue 2637

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Escaping our debt roller coaster

CANBERRA: Simon Crean's winter of discontent

BIOETHICS: Tell the truth about adult stem cells

AGRICULTURE: Sugar industry report: a mixed bag

STRAWS IN THE WIND: Victoria clones white elephant / The new boy scouts

TRADE: Globalism - an idea whose time has passed

LAW: Government approves ICC - with qualifications

Sexual misconduct in the church (letter)

Keeping couples together (letter)

"Censor" or "classify"? (letter)

ENVIRONMENT: Our future in our own hands

MEDIA: What of women traumatised by abortion?

ABC Media Watch: who judges the judges?

ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS: Mabo decision - ten years of frustration

AFRICA: Zimbabwe's agriculture, industry face meltdown

ASIA: Free trade agreements - what's in it for us?

FILM: Molokai: the story of Father Damien

BOOKS: Marriage, Health and the Professions

BOOKS: Afghanistan, Where God Only Comes to Weep, by Siba Shakib

Books promotion page

Sugar industry report: a mixed bag

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, July 13, 2002
The Hilderbrand Report on the sugar industry has some worthwhile suggestions, but remains fundamentally flawed in its response to the serious problems threatening the industry following deregulation, the slashing of tariffs, the loss of a guaranteed price into the domestic market, and the flooding of the world sugar market by Brazil. World subsidies are so high that the world price for raw sugar is half the world average cost of production.

The Report believes improved efficiencies and cost savings are the industry's salvation. Some recommendations are worth considering. For instance, that smaller farmers form local co-operatives to spread their capital costs. However, suggestions that the industry move towards larger producers may only compound problems. It is the smaller farmers who carry no farm debt, while it is the larger farmers who carry considerable proportion of the industry debt.

Important also was the recommendation that the Australian Government move towards a mandated ethanol additive in motor vehicle fuel. This need to be pursued quickly, as the proposal is 20 years old and nothing has been done. It would save many famers, allowing them to diversify into other crops more suitable for ethanol and cheaper to produce than sugar cane.

However the Report remains fundamentally flawed, and perhaps inadvertently admits this. Its executive summary says in part, "Notwithstanding any efficiencies that are gained within the industry's current operations, the largest potential impact on future price (and therefore on the profitability of the industry) lies in a reduction of the protectionist policies of the USA, Europe and Japan. Government and the industry should therefore intensify efforts for more trade reform, although significant reform is unlikely in the short-medium term."

This is a vain hope. US President Bush this year declared agriculture a national security matter, and his economic adviser recently told the Australian Financial Review that the US refused to cut its levels of protection and commit the "equivalent of unilateral disarmament". Further, under NAFTA, Mexico is the only country automatically entitled to increase sugar exports into the US market.

The US also wants to bring the rest of Latin America into a EU style trade area, and Brazil is the biggest economy in Latin America and has the world's fifth largest population. After Mexico, it will get preference over Australia if there are to be any further sugar imports into the US.

Europe, another major sugar competitor, has built the whole European Union around agricultural subsidies. To think that they will wind back such a policy to please Australia and risk political and economic stability is sheer fantasy.

The report also demonstrates little understanding of what can and cannot be done domestically for Australian farmers either directly, or via market support schemes, or even by tariffs.

All are dismissed in a few paragraphs with not a single reference to the all important sections of the World Trade Organisation Uruguay Round agreement on agriculture, which leaves it wide open to governments to apply an enormous range of policies to defend their rural industries from corrupt world markets.

  • Pat Byrne

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am