April 8th 2000

  Buy Issue 2580

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Mr HowardÂ’s circuit-breaker

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Fishy business: WTOÂ’s salmon ruling NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Fishy business: WTOÂ’s salmon ruling


DRUGS: Random drug tests for politicians?

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: UNÂ’s unwelcome interest in local affairs

RURAL: Anger at NP inaction over low farm prices

TELECOMMUNICATIONS: Behind the new Telstra inquiry

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Divisions exposed in ranks of Victorian, NSW Liberals

WORK: Longer working hours: unions ignore developing social crisis

LETTERS: Rural debt a legacy of “get big or get out” mentality

ENVIRONMENT: How KyotoÂ’s greenhouse gas cuts will hit the hip-pocket

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Japan faces up to defence, immigration and overwork

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: ChinaÂ’s spiritual vacuum

UNITED STATES: Foetal tissue sales: “dirty secret” of US abortion industry

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: Democracy for all?

ECONOMICS: How globalisation puts profits before people

POPULATION: Why wonÂ’t Australian women have children?

BOOKS: 'GIVING SORROW WORDS: Women's stories of Post-Abortion Grief', by Melinda Tankard-Reist

BOOKS: 'Karl Marx', by Francis Wheen

Books promotion page

Why wonÂ’t Australian women have children?

by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, April 8, 2000
Pro-family forces have long warned about declining fertility rates and the erosion of parenthood. When a woman who is known more for her commitment to feminism than for her allegiance to conservatism raises the same issues, then we need to stand up and take notice. Leslie Cannold, writing in the March 16 Melbourne Age, wrote of "The population debate we have to have". It was not the migration debate she was concerned about, but the steady erosion of child birth.

She states what groups like the Australian Family Association have claimed for years: we are facing a "birth dearth", to use Ben Wattenberg's phrase. Most Western societies are just not keeping up with replacement levels, i.e., 2.1 children per woman. In Australia the fertility rate has fallen to 1.75.

Now if this is just a matter of choice, writes Cannold, then no big deal. If men and women don't want children or want fewer children, so be it. But she reminds us that the evidence - as meagre as it is - suggests otherwise:

"The steady decline in Australia's birthrate since 1961 is evidence of the ever-widening gap between the number of children we want, and the number of children we have. The problem with falling population, in other words, is that it represents an erosion of women's and men's freedom to embrace parenthood."

Pro-family lobbyists couldn't have put it better.

And that is exactly the problem we face. Leslie Cannold closes her piece by urging our politicians to "canvas all the causes and cures for our declining numbers".

Well, the causes are not hard to come by. One hundred thousand aborted babies each year does not help matters much. Nor do government policies which tend to favour two-income families and penalise one-income families.

Certain feminist agendas which try to encourage women to choose careers over families must also share some of the blame. And population control 'experts' who tell us Australia is grossly over-populated have also contributed to the current problem.

Each of these causes has been addressed at length by concerned pro-family advocates. Consider just one in more detail. The large increase in the number of women in the paid work force is certainly one very important contributing factor to the decline in births.

According to ABS figures, in 1997 women's labour force participation rate had risen to over 53%.

While much of this increase is in the area of part-time and casual work, it reflects a major change in social structure. As a result, more and more women are either putting off child birth altogether, or delaying it considerably.

A few figures bear this out. In 1990 there were 262,648 registered births. In 1997 this number fell to 251,842. And in 1977, the median age of childbearing was 26.1 years. In 1997 it had increased to 29.4 years.

The clarion call of feminism to convince women that career is more important than family is part of the cause of these trends. Popular culture's disdain and lampooning of marriage and family is another factor. So too are government policies which in effect reward two income families and penalise those who forgo income to spend more time with children.

There are many reasons why we should be concerned about the birth dearth. A major one is the rise of the elderly population coupled with the decrease in the younger generation. Put crassly, who's going to pay the bills? Benefits and payments to the elderly have to come from somewhere. And with a shrinking tax base of young income earners, how are we going to fund the needs of our elderly population?

A few figures illustrate my point. In 1901 there were 151,000 people aged 65 years and over living in Australia, comprising four per cent of the total population.

In 1998 this number grew to 2.3 million, or 12 per cent of the population. By 2050 this figure is expected mushroom to over 6 million (25 per cent).

Governments need to think hard and fast about how we are going to financially support this growing pool of elderly Australians.

Thus the issue of declining birth rates affects us all. It is therefore very encouraging to see the likes of Leslie Cannold raise these important issues. Dealing with the problems is another matter however.

The solutions are multifaceted and difficult. Whether our leaders have the determination to make necessary changes is the real question.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am