October 20th 2001


  Buy Issue 2619
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Issues for the forthcoming election

TESTIMONIAL: Digger James: Why I support 'News Weekly'

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The 'other' election on November 10

ECONOMICS: Who's looking after world trade

BIOETHICS: Cloning: a mixed bag

Straws in the Wind: Come in, Spinner

SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Parents call for increased penalties for drug trafficking

TERRORISM: Why the Muslim world hates America

AFGHANISTAN: Australia must protect the innocent victims of war

Letter: Refugee analysis wrong

Letter: Free trade challenge

Letter: Marriage costs

PACIFIC: After the civil war: Bougainville looks ahead

MEDIA: Mutual admiration / "Beazley-class" subs

COMMENT: Baddies are not always cowards

DOCUMENTATION: Latest data show mothers' preference for home

COMMENT: Don't hurt us, we're men

Books: 'THE LITTLE ICE AGE: How Climate Made History 1300-1850', by Brian Fagan

Books: 'One in Thirteen: The Silent Epidemic of Teen Suicide', by Jessica Portner

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

COMMENT:
Baddies are not always cowards


by Bill James

News Weekly, October 20, 2001

When I was a boy I commanded my own regiment. It was quartered in a tin box and consisted of dozens of small plastic figures: soldiers from various historical eras; cowboys and Indians; mediaeval knights; even some frogmen. Drawn up in formation, they looked more like a Village People concert than a military unit. They had all been moulded into appropriately martial postures, with the exception of one group. Amongst the WWII German soldiers, one was running away, another had his hands up and another was waving a white flag.

A number of commentators have pointed out that the September 11 hijackers, whatever other virtues they lacked, were not wanting in courage. And yet we wish that they were. Like the manufacturer of my miniature stormtroopers, we would like to console ourselves with the belief that the perpetrators of reprehensible actions are cowards. Unfortunately, it isn't true. The Third Reich was responsible for what was arguably the worst crime of modern history, but the Wehrmacht in general performed very bravely. Some of its auxiliary formations, such as the Waffen SS, fought with suicidal commitment and Hitler, its commander in chief, had earned an award for outstanding valour during WWI.

The list of the "brave but bad" goes on and on. Mussolini also had a respectable war record, being wounded in 1917 during the fighting against Austria in the Alps. Joseph Stalin, author of the Great Terror and one of the Big Three 20th Century murderers, displayed steadfastness and competence in both the Russian Civil War and the "Great Patriotic War".

Mao Tse-tung and the Red Army recorded feats of death-defying determination in the Great March and the campaigns against the Japanese and Kuomintang, as a prelude to setting up the most lethal regime in history.

Japanese troops, guilty of horrific massacres and other atrocities against both civilian and military opponents, were among the bravest soldiers of the Second World War. Field Marshal Sir William Slim remarked that every army talks about fighting to the last man and the last bullet, but only the Japanese actually came close to doing it. The novelist John Masters, who fought under Slim in Burma, claimed that in the British Army almost every Japanese soldier would have won a Victoria Cross.

As a final example, we have witnessed in our own era the extraordinary endurance and tenaciousness exhibited by groups such as the Viet Cong, the Khmer Rouge and the Pathet Lao in their homicidal struggle to force the population of Indo-China under communist totalitarianism.

At a more mundane level, we have to face the fact that it takes courage to break the law. Common or garden variety criminals, like the more high profile September 11 hijackers, are routinely described in the media as "cowardly". We would like to believe that that was true, too. Sometimes, as in the case of offences against old people, it is. Most of us, however, would not dare even to shoplift, not only because we think it is wrong, but also because we are afraid of the consequences of getting caught.

This innate dread of transgressing the legal code comes out in fiction. P.G. Wodehouse's Bertie Wooster, inveigled into purloining some item from a spooky country home in the middle of the night, reflected that reports of the decline of British pluck must be ill-founded if the British burglar did this sort of thing on a regular basis.

The problem, then, is that the vast majority of the citizens of civilised, liberal democratic societies tend to be far less temperamentally contemptuous of danger than their ideological opponents. Most of us possess an all too highly developed instinct for self-preservation.

In our own country, the point of Anzac Day is not (as is sometimes suggested in the sillier hype) that Australians were the world's greatest soldiers, heroically eager to sacrifice themselves on the altar of martial glory. Its significance is rather that ordinary men and women were more interested in their families, jobs, homes, sports and hobbies than in war, but rose to the occasion in defiance of their natural inclinations when called upon to do so. Some of the outcomes were remarkable.

Nearly 60 years ago, militia units whose young ex-civilians had barely begun to shave confronted battle-hardened and indoctrinated Japanese jungle fighters along the Kokoda Trail, while at Milne Bay Australians defeated them on land for the first time and thus, as the aforementioned Slim wrote, "broke the spell of the invincibility of the Japanese Army".

The archetypal example of the clash between the open society and militant absolutism is the Peloponnesian War (431-404BC) of Athens versus Sparta. Based as it was upon slave labour, Athens could scarcely be described as a liberal democracy, but at least it nurtured its inchoate elements. Free Athenians by no means neglected defence, but were not obsessed with it to the exclusion of the other aspects of life - social, economic, political, intellectual, aesthetic and spiritual.

For Sparta, the militaristic ethos of unconditional obedience, discipline and self-sacrifice constituted an end in itself. In the midst of the "soft" West's current conflict with the fanatical lunatic fringe of Islam, it might be of some comfort to note that Sparta was the immediate winner, but that Athens triumphed in the long term.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm