November 17th 2001

  Buy Issue 2621

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: Widespread support for Development Bank

Editorial: Election 2001 - The issues which must be addressed

TESTIMONIAL: News Weekly: more than a magazine

BIOETHICS: Church leaders reject all human cloning

DEFENCE: Navy League endorses Coastwatch, rejects coast guard

Straws in the Wind: The great wombat race / Inch by inch / Escobar lives!

ECONOMICS: Development Bank - a boost for regional enterprise

COMMENT: Exposing the anti-American Left

Letter: Development Bank

Letter: Pakistan next?

Letter: Knowledge nation

Letter: What jobs?

Afghanistan: War on terror - the scorecard so far

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Baby bonus signals sea-change in family policy

HEALTH: Are too many Australian children over-medicated?

EUTHANASIA: Belgium threatens to go down the Dutch road

ECONOMY: Where competition policy fails

LITERATURE: Nobel winner celebrates life and civilisation

Books promotion page

Cover Story: Widespread support for Development Bank

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, November 17, 2001

During the election campaign widespread support emerged for the call by former ANZ Chief, Will Bailey, for the major parties to support a public inquiry into the effects of bank deregulation after 16 years, and into the feasibility of establishing a new government-backed development bank.

Despite political pundits saying the issue would get buried in the election campaign, it persisted and ran in the mainstream media for almost three weeks. This is despite much of the electorate being disengaged from the elections, while the emotionally charged issues of Tampa and the war on terrorism muddied the political waters.

The issue drew sympathy and support from journalists and editors on some metropolitan newspapers and found strong support from rural and regional media, local councils, small business groups and some industry lobby groups.

At the time of News Weekly going to press (Wednesday, November 7), only the Democrats, who have held the balance of power in the Senate, were committed to supporting an inquiry. The Sydney Morning Herald Editorial (October 30) said that the proposal "warrants a considerable debate".

Labor leader Kim Beazley painted the issue as a call for a poor man’s bank that would give the major banks "the excuse they need to walk away from all their social responsibilities" to pensioners, social security recipients and low income earners. Instead, Labor pushed the concept of a Bank Charter for the commercial banks.

Ironically, his letter appeared in the Age newspaper (November 7) on the opposite page to a feature article by Will Bailey pointing out that his proposal was for anything but a poor man’s bank.

Mr Bailey said that "... specialist financial institutions have disappeared. In particular, institutions which provided longer term, low interest loans, have closed or been absorbed into other organisations.

"In other countries specialist institutions owned by the community exist to support the development of the country through assisting small and medium sized businesses.

"The support for small and medium-sized business is seen as a national priority as these enterprises are the drivers of job creation and wealth creation. There is plenty of evidence around the world to demonstrate the need for, and success of, such institutions.

"Contrary to much political rhetoric these institutions are not a cost to the community. They run at modest profits."

He said these institutions do not compete with the commercial banks, but "complement other players in the market as they provide services others don’t want to offer."

Mr Bailey said earlier that Labor’s proposed "Bank Charter" and more bank regulation "cannot make the banks provide the services that a development bank could provide."

Meanwhile, the response from Liberal campaign rooms and candidates criticised the proposal because it would involve handing out "taxpayer funded ... subsidised loans" to certain sections of the community.

Yet the Liberals were promoting their $70 million expenditure on Rural Transaction Centres. These Centres are much-needed in many in rural and regional areas, but ironically, they are also examples of the government handing out "taxpayer" subsidies to local communities which have lost the banking facilities that commercial banks are no longer willing to provide.

Both Liberal and Labor skirted the issue, declaring support for more community banks like the Bendigo Bank. While such banks provide important services, they do not have the capital base to be a development bank.

Mr Bailey’s proposal gained support from one of Australia’s leading historians and economists, Emeritus Professor Hugh Stretton, who said that while "the dogmatic theorists of deregulation will say it won’t work, ...over much of the north-west of Europe similar institutions have long worked well" (Australian Financial Review, November 6).

Writing in the Canberra Times (November 6), Emeritus Professor Ted Kolsen, from the University of Queensland, said: "If our leaders are going to ‘build the nation,’ then they are going to have to look in new policy directions that ‘build our regions and industries’".

He pointed out that the former Commonwealth Development Bank had shown that this concept can work, helping to establish 400,000 small businesses in its 30-year history, adding: "The major party that supports a new bank, or an inquiry into its feasibility, is likely to win critical support in marginal electorates because they cover those regions most affected by the negative impact of bank deregulation.

"Of equal importance," he said, "is the political signal such a policy would send to the electorate; that the next government would be going forward with new policies, different from the old economic agenda that has run its course over the past 20 years."

If none of the major parties commits to an inquiry in the latter days of the campaign, then it will be up to the Democrats, and possibly other Independents, to drive the issue forward in the parliament.

In the wider community, there is little doubt that this has become an issue that is not going to go away.

  • Pat Byrne

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am