April 22nd 2000

  Buy Issue 2581

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Will Telstra be fully privatised?

EDITORIAL: The "stolen generation“

CANBERRA OBSERVED: John Howard trapped in Aboriginal mine field

RURAL AFFAIRS: WA report highlights declining rural infrastructure

HEALTH FUNDS: Will genetic tests lead to discrimination?

ECONOMICS: Lessons from Malaysia's Mahathir

TAXATION: Families may suffer under GST

Why Liberal and ALP economic policies are indistinguishable

RUSSIA: What Vladimir Putin's election signifies



Globalisation: As capital goes global, unions go global

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: How the "China factor" affects US relations with Asia

Bioethics: Move to harvest human embryo stem cells

INDUSTRY POLICY: Jobs for life: the Nucor approach

TAIWAN: Opposition wins presidential election

BOOKS: 'The Packaging of Australia: Politics and Culture Wars', by Gregory Melleuish

POLITICS: Straws in the Wind

TELEVISION: The Sopranos

Books promotion page

survey link


Families may suffer under GST

by Bill Muehlenberg

News Weekly, April 22, 2000

The Federal Government has admitted that some families may be worse off under the new tax system which comes into effect on July 1. Changes to eligibility rules for the parenting payment - worth up to $67 a fortnight - may mean some families will no longer be entitled to the benefits.

The government is now arguing that, although some parents may temporarily be disadvantaged, the overall effect of the new tax scheme will in fact make families better off.

In order to offset any disadvantage, the government has announced a once-off compensation package for those families that can prove financial loss. This compensation will be paid out only once, and will last for just three months, finishing on September 20.

The government claims that any economic disadvantage resulting from the new tax package will apply only in the early months of the system - thus the short period being allowed for compensation. A spokesman for Family and Community Services Minister, Jocelyn Newman, said that the government was not expecting any demand for the compensation, but should it be required as a safety measure, the system will be in place for a short period. Prime Minister Howard told Parliament that the "review mechanism" was established "to enable anybody who thinks they are being financially disadvantaged ... to have their circumstances assessed".

The admission by the Federal Government that some families may be worse off under the new tax system is a cause of concern. Of equal concern is the remedy being provided. Families will have to demonstrate financial loss before receiving any compensation for the shortfall.

It seems that families should automatically be given any financial compensation. The government, in other words, not families, should be the one to take the initiative. One wonders how many families will know they are entitled to the special compensation; take the time to offer proof of financial loss; and be able to accurately provide the evidence for such loss. My guess is that most families would not consider it worth the bother. Moreover, this should be a permanent arrangement, not a short-term one. If any family is penalised by the GST, now or in the future, redress should be available on an ongoing basis, not just for three months.

This Government has put families first in its rhetoric. In this situation it should put families first in action as well.

Bill Muehlenberg is national secretary of the Australian Family Association.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse

News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm