November 3rd 2001

  Buy Issue 2620

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: Afghanistan - Why the war on terrorism will be long and risky

Editorial: Why the ALP could win by default

TESTIMONIAL: A policy agenda for Australia's future prosperity

Election 2001: When will the parties support a new bank?

Defence: US Navy commissions Australian high speed catamaran

Canberra Observed: Nationals looking down the barrel

Straws in the Wind: Varieties of evil / Russian fears / My enemy's enemy is my friend

Law: Family Court redefines man

Government spokesmen confirm WTO threats

Media: Moral equivalence / Will they be invited back?

Letter: Settlement deaths

Letter: Beazley defended

Letter: Defence solution

Comment: The evil face of terrorism

Drugs: The case against medical cannabis

Obituary: Vale Phyllis Boyd

China: Can the Chinese Communist Party survive the market?

Books: 'John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain 1937-46' by Robert Skidelsky

Books promotion page

Letter: Settlement deaths

by Bruce Breslin

News Weekly, November 3, 2001


Keith Windschuttle's views (History, News Weekly, October 6) on the role of Aboriginal-European conflict in the period at and immediately after first contact have no basis in Australian history.

The shipwrecked sailor, James Morrill, spent 17 years living with the Aboriginal people in north Queensland (1846-63) and was an eyewitness to the conflict which occurred on the frontier.

In the published account of his life with the Aborigines (Sketch of a Residence) published two months after he rejoined the settlers in 1863, Morrill reported the indiscriminate killing of his Aboriginal friends by the Native Mounted Police.

He spoke of the "shooting down of the tribe I had been living with" (p. 14) at Cape Upstart and the killing of about fifteen of his companions who had been on a fishing trip.

Rather than readily embrace the invaders, Morrill explained that the Aborigines were hoping for a flood in the coming wet season in 1863 which would "drown all the white troublers, with their horses, cattle and sheep". (Maryborough Chronicle, March 19, 1863.)

When Morrill explained to the Aboriginal people that the well-armed white invaders had come to take away their land, his friends' last wish to him was to ask the whites "to let them have all the ground to the north of the Burdekin and to let them fish in the rivers" (Sketch of a Residence, p. 16).

The answer was sent from the rifle and the Aborigines were left with no alternative but to rise and resist.

Windschuttle's assertion that Aboriginal resistance in defence of their land is simply ideology "derived from the anti-colonial movements of Asia and Africa in the 1950s and 60s" dismisses the evidence presented before the Australian public in the 1860s.

Bruce Breslin
Trinity Beach, Qld

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

COVER STORY Blackouts due to closure of coal-fired power stations

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY The Four Ideologies of the 21st century: Transgenderism, Libertarianism, cultural and Economic, and Radical Environmentalism

CANBERRA OBSERVED The left's appetite for change can't be satisfied

EDITORIAL Behind China's push for global power

COVER STORY Weatherill demand places Murray-Darling in jeopardy

CANBERRA OBSERVED Greens: wouldn't know a cowardly act if they did one

REDEFINITION OF MARRIAGE Government forms say it is fluid gender marriage

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
March 16, 2017, 10:40 am