November 3rd 2001


  Buy Issue 2620
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: Afghanistan - Why the war on terrorism will be long and risky

Editorial: Why the ALP could win by default

TESTIMONIAL: A policy agenda for Australia's future prosperity

Election 2001: When will the parties support a new bank?

Defence: US Navy commissions Australian high speed catamaran

Canberra Observed: Nationals looking down the barrel

Straws in the Wind: Varieties of evil / Russian fears / My enemy's enemy is my friend

Law: Family Court redefines man

Government spokesmen confirm WTO threats

Media: Moral equivalence / Will they be invited back?

Letter: Settlement deaths

Letter: Beazley defended

Letter: Defence solution

Comment: The evil face of terrorism

Drugs: The case against medical cannabis

Obituary: Vale Phyllis Boyd

China: Can the Chinese Communist Party survive the market?

Books: 'John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain 1937-46' by Robert Skidelsky

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:


Editorial: Why the ALP could win by default


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, November 3, 2001

As the major parties move into the last fortnight of the campaign, the outcome of the election is quite uncertain - not only due to the complex interaction of the war in Afghanistan with domestic issues, but also the different voting patterns between WA and Queensland, on one hand, and the south-eastern states on the other; and complex preference deals involving the minor parties.

Contrary to the opinion polls, the Federal Coalition always faced an uphill battle to win the 2001 Federal Election. "Third election syndrome" is the term used to describe the fact that political parties find it extremely difficult to win three successive terms in office - at either the state or federal levels.

Over the past 50 years, the only exceptions to this have been at times of discord in the opposition parties - defeating Labor in the 1950s and 1960s, and the Liberals in the 1980s.

Support base

In the case of the Federal Coalition, its difficulties have been magnified by policies which antagonised key sections of its own bases of support.

Whatever other Australians may think about these issues, gun control, privatisation of government services and national competition policy, along with the impact of financial deregulation of the banking system, aroused fierce resentment in rural and regional Australia; while the tax reform package, particularly the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax, upset many small businesses and farmers.

The sense of rural disenchantment is likely to be exacerbated by the recent slide in commodity prices for exports such as sugar, beef, cotton and wool - which the major parties have studiously ignored.

The Coalition could be defeated as a result of a preference deal between the ALP and the Australian Democrats, and the blind hostility of One Nation and other minor parties in putting Coalition MPs last.

Labor is campaigning mainly on health and education, in both cases, pursuing policies which probably achieve exactly the opposite of what the ALP expects.

In relation to health care, ALP policy of increasing expenditure on the public health system to reduce hospital waiting lists will lead to a reduction in the number of people taking private health insurance, ultimately, placing more pressure on public hospitals.

On education, its "hit list" of non-government schools will simply force more parents to send their children to government schools, requiring even greater expenditure in the public education sector.

In both areas, the real issues have been largely ignored. It was the Australian Medical Association that questioned the impact of privatisation of the hospital and medical system on those suffering chronic illnesses.

On the two main international issues, there is a bipartisan consensus. Both sides supported deployment of units of the Australian army, naval and air force to overthrow the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which has provided aid and comfort to Osama bin Laden's al Qaida terror network.

Despite point scoring, both have pursued a common policy against entry of boat people coming to Australia from Indonesia, including special legislation to remove Christmas and Cocos Islands, and Ashmore Reef, from Australia's migration zone, and the use of naval vessels to ship boat people to Nauru and other islands in the Pacific.

Neither party has seriously addressed the need for a substantial increase in Australia's defence forces to meet the growing challenges Australia faces as a major power in the South Pacific region, quite apart from its international commitments to the war on terror.

Nor have they addressed the steady erosion of Australia's international financial position, evident in the collapse of the value of the Australian dollar, the surging foreign debt (now over $317 billion), the decline of Australia's manufacturing industry (down from 25 per cent of GDP 30 years ago to just 13 per cent of GDP today), and an excessive reliance on service industries such as tourism.

One consequence of this has been the continued takeover of Australian businesses, including highly profitable mining companies such as BHP, Ashton Mining, CRA, and now WMC Holdings, whose assets seem certain to be carved up among a handful of major global mining houses.

One area of significant difference is social policy, where the social conservatism of the Prime Minister on issues such as marriage and the family, cloning and IVF contrast with the libertarian policies of the ALP.

Many people strongly prefer Mr Howard's position on these questions; but for whatever reason, he has chosen to say little or nothing about them.

Neither party has grasped the depth of the crisis in rural or regional areas. The proposal by former ANZ chief, Will Bailey, for a new People's Bank, would be a good starting point, and good policy for either party to win key marginal seats.

It may be that the Coalition's failure to differentiate itself from the ALP on these issues, and the loss of its traditional bases of support, will cost it government.
  • Peter Westmore is President of the National Civic Council.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm