May 5th 2001


  Buy Issue 2607
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: The facts behind the rural revolt

Editorial: Rescuing the airline industry

Canberra Observed: What a Beazley Government means

Agriculture: Dried fruit industry savaged by deregulation

Text: Straws in the Wind: Our new cultural assimiladoes

The Media: A tale of two murders

National Affairs: Behind Costello's veto of Woodside takeover

Defence: Labor's new Maginot Line

Letter: Defence priority

Comment: Why Australia needs a strong manufacturing base

Globalism: Are trade treaties a Bill of Rights for Big Business?

History: Death in Life

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

Letter: Defence priority


by Greg Byrne

News Weekly, May 5, 2001
Sir,

Defence will always be a non-issue with Australians. It's 60 years since the fall of Singapore so nobody outside the nursing home population has any recollection of what it is like to be threatened militarily. All previous wars in which Australia was involved were due to its membership of the British Empire. If the British Empire was at war Australia was at war.

It's obvious from statements regarding the Vietnam War that most leading Liberals at the time did not believe in it. So one can see that the Liberals have never really believed in defence, and their attitude is the same as that of the general public, that unless there is a possible attack on the Australian mainland Australia hasn't got a defence problem.

That leaves aside regional problems and global problems which could be very serious. One can see a possible war in the Middle East which would tie up American resources and leave this area undefended.

What in my view would be better (although not good by a long chalk) is for Australia to come to some sort of financial arrangement with the US to provide naval defence of Australia itself, i.e., to provide aircraft carrier protection from any contingency in the Indian or Pacific Oceans that might arise from China or India. But Australia would have to pay an insurance premium of many billions of dollars.

That would enable the US to provide for joint defence and to have bases in Australia. Additionally, Australia would have to host bases for the anti-ballistic missile system that the US wants to set up.

Beazley is not likely to do as much as Howard, and is likely to find himself with heavy expenditure commitments for health, education and welfare which are vote winners.

There is a government publication from the ABS saying that government expenditure is about $56 billion per quarter which is about $224 billion per year. Dividing that by 20 million people, that comes to about $10,000 per person. This is why the average family loses half its income in taxes, which in turn, is why married women need to work. About 70 per cent of this is just pork-barrelling and has nothing to do with legitimate expenditures on defence or other essential government activities.

Australians, like the New Zealanders, have the "I'm all right, Jack" mentality as far as defence is concerned.

Don't be surprised if this Defence White Paper goes the way of the others. Defence will be cut back to make way for education and hospitals and so on. Realistically looking back on the last 30 years one can see no other possibility. And if Howard is beaten at the next election, the Liberals will elect a trendy to lead them and he'll be as bad as Beazley.

Greg Byrne,
Rowville, Vic




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm