May 5th 2001

  Buy Issue 2607

Articles from this issue:

Cover Story: The facts behind the rural revolt

Editorial: Rescuing the airline industry

Canberra Observed: What a Beazley Government means

Agriculture: Dried fruit industry savaged by deregulation

Text: Straws in the Wind: Our new cultural assimiladoes

The Media: A tale of two murders

National Affairs: Behind Costello's veto of Woodside takeover

Defence: Labor's new Maginot Line

Letter: Defence priority

Comment: Why Australia needs a strong manufacturing base

Globalism: Are trade treaties a Bill of Rights for Big Business?

History: Death in Life

Books promotion page

Letter: Defence priority

by Greg Byrne

News Weekly, May 5, 2001

Defence will always be a non-issue with Australians. It's 60 years since the fall of Singapore so nobody outside the nursing home population has any recollection of what it is like to be threatened militarily. All previous wars in which Australia was involved were due to its membership of the British Empire. If the British Empire was at war Australia was at war.

It's obvious from statements regarding the Vietnam War that most leading Liberals at the time did not believe in it. So one can see that the Liberals have never really believed in defence, and their attitude is the same as that of the general public, that unless there is a possible attack on the Australian mainland Australia hasn't got a defence problem.

That leaves aside regional problems and global problems which could be very serious. One can see a possible war in the Middle East which would tie up American resources and leave this area undefended.

What in my view would be better (although not good by a long chalk) is for Australia to come to some sort of financial arrangement with the US to provide naval defence of Australia itself, i.e., to provide aircraft carrier protection from any contingency in the Indian or Pacific Oceans that might arise from China or India. But Australia would have to pay an insurance premium of many billions of dollars.

That would enable the US to provide for joint defence and to have bases in Australia. Additionally, Australia would have to host bases for the anti-ballistic missile system that the US wants to set up.

Beazley is not likely to do as much as Howard, and is likely to find himself with heavy expenditure commitments for health, education and welfare which are vote winners.

There is a government publication from the ABS saying that government expenditure is about $56 billion per quarter which is about $224 billion per year. Dividing that by 20 million people, that comes to about $10,000 per person. This is why the average family loses half its income in taxes, which in turn, is why married women need to work. About 70 per cent of this is just pork-barrelling and has nothing to do with legitimate expenditures on defence or other essential government activities.

Australians, like the New Zealanders, have the "I'm all right, Jack" mentality as far as defence is concerned.

Don't be surprised if this Defence White Paper goes the way of the others. Defence will be cut back to make way for education and hospitals and so on. Realistically looking back on the last 30 years one can see no other possibility. And if Howard is beaten at the next election, the Liberals will elect a trendy to lead them and he'll be as bad as Beazley.

Greg Byrne,
Rowville, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am