April 20th 2019


  Buy Issue 3042
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY Budget 2019: The dark side of 'back in the black': no vision

EUTHANASIA FYI: How to navigate the voluntary assisted 'dying' process

CANBERRA OBSERVED Take your tax cuts and be merry, for tomorrow ... is another day

FOREIGN AFFAIRS New Middle East alliance will challenge Saudis

LIFE ISSUES ALP abortion policy blithely tramples all our consciences

SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGY Will Artificial Intelligence do the walking for you?

LIFE ISSUES Trump, Shorten and Morrison on abortion

GENDER POLITICS Women abused at Women's Day March

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Bill Shorten's bizarre electric car policy

FAMILY AND SOCIETY Revitalising marriage and family: an especially lay apostolate

ASIAN AFFAIRS Entire nations going out without a baby's whimper

HUMOUR

MUSIC 1+1=Sublimity: Explanations are like the back side of a tapestry

CINEMA Shazam!: Ambitious teen finds out what's in a name

BOOK REVIEW What will be left us after the deluge?

BOOK REVIEW Author puts some great minds to work

LETTERS

POETRY

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

CANBERRA OBSERVED
Take your tax cuts and be merry, for tomorrow ... is another day


by NW Contributor

News Weekly, April 20, 2019

The 2019 Budget delivered by freshly minted Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, together with Opposition Leader Bill Shorten’s Budget-in-reply speech, focused largely on tax cuts and short-term lures to the electorate at the expense of any solid plan to secure Australia’s long-term future.

The country’s short election cycle, the revolving-door leadership malaise and the parliamentary gridlock of the past decade continue to take a toll; and this means that ministers are thinking in short time frames rather than serious long-term policy development.

Of course, Labor has brazenly presented a radical overhaul of the tax system, virtually abolishing negative gearing and introducing much higher capital gains taxes, as well as making a cash grab on share dividend payments. However, these are really just big revenue-raising measures rather than proper tax reform.

There is little doubt that Labor’s plans will harm capital formation in this country. In other words, there will be less appeal in investing in Australian listed companies and far less appeal in investing Australian property as means of building wealth.

The latter may not be such a bad thing because the national pastime of getting rich in “bricks and mortar” does create a distortion in the economy (although the family home will remain a tax haven). But Labor’s combined measures will lead to more people looking overseas to find investment opportunities.

Awkwardly, Labor does have a long-term plan on climate change, but there is a danger that this will be a handbrake on the economy in order to “do our bit” to fight global emissions.

Labor’s push for 50 per cent electric cars sold by 2030 will necessitate a substitute for fuel excise revenue, which will net $12 billion for the federal coffers each year for roads and highways.

Electric cars will still rely on our 70 per cent coal-fired electricity system, so won’t be totally “clean”, but, because they won’t be using petrol, they won’t be paying the fuel excise. Someone will have to pay for the roads to be built.

Meanwhile, on the Government side, infrastructure has joined health, defence and welfare in the big-spender federal portfolios club, and this year’s Budget went to a new level again with a record $100 billion over 10 years in a massive rolling infrastructure plan. This includes an additional $23 billion of new funding in the 2019–20 Budget.

It is a lot of money and a big federal government commitment to this particular area of spending. This is especially so as Finance Minister Mathias Cormann has been putting an efficiency squeeze on so many other areas of government in order to keep a lid on government spending and get the Budget back into the black.

According to the minister largely responsible for the spendathon, Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack, since 2013–14 the Coalition has committed $145 billion to new and upgraded road and rail projects across the country.

However, it could be argued that there is no cohesive national plan but rather a group of big, chunky projects and a whole lot of smaller ones, many of which appear to be tailored towards marginal seats.

A lot of the infrastructure spending is being thrown at “busting congestion” in the east coast capital cities, which have experienced a population explosion in recent years.

The Urban Congestion Fund has been given $4 billion to tackle traffic bottlenecks, including $500 million earmarked for a Commuter Carpark Fund so commuters can park their cars and ride to work.

In defence of the Government, there are genuinely two important constituencies to serve: cities suffering from population growth shock; and the regions, with their vastly competing needs.

The regions benefit from investment in 25 key freight corridors to connect agricultural and mining regions more efficiently to the nation’s ports, airports and transport hubs. Every state benefits from the huge infrastructure spending in the Coalition’s Budget.

However, absent from the Budget (and even more so in the Opposition’s reply) is any cohesive plan to decentralise the population, a comprehensive water plan, or any plan to ensure Australia’s energy security. Very fast trains that have been discussed forever to connect the major population hubs remain but a pipe dream.

Meanwhile, China continues to work on the biggest infrastructure planning of possibly any epoch. It not only includes re-engineering its own vast country but, with the extraordinarily ambitious “Belt and Road” plan, includes transnational super electricity grids and a highway system that stretches from Spain to Indonesia.

A skeptical reader might wonder where the funding for all this infrastructure is going to come from. Well, If the Coalition or the ALP were to commit to an Australian Infrastructure Investment Bank, similar to the one the Chinese have established for Asia – and as the NCC has been promoting for quite some years now – the funding would cease to be a problem, and cease to be a drain on the budget.

The closest either Mr Frydenberg or Mr Shorten came to addressing the question, was Mr Shorten’s promise to take a bipartisan approach with the Coalition in any negotiations with Infrastructure Australia. Not much; but a faint flame has been lit for the future.




























All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal, June 5-6, 2019: An account from the live streaming

EDITORIAL How Scott Morrison routed Labor, the Greens, GetUp and the left media

EDITORIAL Religious freedom will be suffocated if ALP elected

NATIONAL AFFAIRS The trial of Cardinal Pell ... an injustice

OBITUARY Bob Hawke: astute politician; flawed policies

COVER STORY Green energy policies freeze out the poor

COVER STORY Scomo routs Labor, the Green, GetUp and the left-wing media by Patrick J. Byrne and Peter Westmore



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm