June 30th 2001

  Buy Issue 2611

Articles from this issue:

Editorial :Winning elections ... or governing the country?

Canberra observed - Beazley falters in pre-election " phoney war"

Economics - Industry policy where to now?

National affairs - One.Tel collapse- shades of Fawlty Towers

Straws in the Wind

Clark allegations leave political players lost for words

Barley deregulation - Victorian ALP backs agribusiness

The Media

Letter: Insurance failures - who should pay?

Raymond Aron - an idealist with common sense

Hague self-destructs: so why won't the Tory Party?

17,000 US scientists say greenhouse theory wrong

New opportunities in life issues debate

Out of Ireland

Is news what the Big Six say it is?

60th anniversary of Baltic deportations

Film - Pearl Harbor, a film that will live in infamy

Books promotion page

The Media

by John Styles

News Weekly, June 30, 2001
Political correspondent Michelle Grattan once said that Paul Keating regarded the media "as dogs to be sooled on to opponents". At the ABC the command is unnecessary. Attacking the Coalition seems to happen by instinct; and it leaves the national broadcaster looking like a Labor running dog. An example occurred recently.

On June 4 the emotive issue of nursing home standards arose during Question Time in the House of Representatives.

The Federal Opposition alleged that a Sydney nursing home owned by a Liberal Party donor had been allowed to stay open even though the Aged Care Standards Agency (ACSA) had supposedly recommended that its licence be revoked, a claim the owner later denied.

When Labor tried to question Aged Care Minister Bronwyn Bishop about her knowledge of the donation, the Speaker ruled the question out of order.

That evening the ABC Radio PM program pursued Labor's line, intensely questioning Bronwyn Bishop and also interviewing the owner of the nursing home about the question of political donations. This, of course, is fair enough, even if the ABC journalists did appear to accept the ALP's questions at face value. Bronwyn Bishop, in the event, seemed able to refute them easily.

On the question of political donations, Millie Phillips revealed that she had not only made donations to the Liberal Party but also to the Labor Party. This exposed a certain hypocrisy in Labor's attack. But the revelation didn't seem to interest the journalist. He ignored it. He sought details of her donations to Liberal Party - for example, how much and how often - but not of her gifts to the Labor Party.

Millie Phillips accused the Labor Party of using her as a "whipping post" on account of her wealth and status. In view of Bronwyn Bishop's relatively easy rebuttal of Labor's questions and the fact that the nursing home owner had donated money to both major parties, surely it was time for the ABC journalists to turn on the Labor Party.

A truly balanced package would have questioned Labor's motives and challenged the accuracy of the allegations.

The Minister's Labor accusers should have been grilled about their blatant display of hypocrisy and about the nature and number of the donations their party also received from Millie Phillips. That kind of inquiry did not happen.

Nor did the program interview a member of the ACSA who surely would have shed light on Labor's claims.

The standard of care in nursing homes is a vital public issue and deserves the keenest scrutiny. But the ABC PM package, seemed more interested in advancing Labor's case than about balanced reporting and getting to the truth of the situation at the nursing home.

The ABC could be engaging in a little wedge politics of its own if you consider the national broadcaster's resurgent enthusiasm for rural programs, with offerings like Bush Telegraph broadcast at 11 am Monday to Friday on Radio National.

The ABC is a potentially divisive question for the Coalition. On the one hand, many urban Liberals loathe the left-liberal and pro-Labor bias of its capital city-produced news and current affairs programs. On the other, the National Party embraces the regional voice of the ABC as a much needed service for its constituency.

The Nationals' "warts and all" enthusiasm for the ABC rarely, if ever, seems to distinguish between the usefulness of the medium as a rural service through, for example, its 48 regional radio stations, and the nature of the editorial content. The Coalition adage that "the ABC is our enemy talking to our friends" is particularly relevant in National Party heartland.

If, as they claim, the Nationals' constituents rely on programs like AM and PM for their insights into current affairs, is it surprising that the party is in so much electoral trouble?

By extending rural services and playing to the rural audience, ABC programmers may be fulfilling the corporation's charter obligations more comprehensively. At the same time the moves could serve to muddy the debate within Coalition ranks about ABC political bias.

Incidentally, on June 18 a new series was launched on Bush Telegraph, looking at "the changes and shifts in Australian political parties". The presenter, Helen Brown, announced that the program would run "from the oldest - the ALP - to the likely new force in the Senate, and that's the Australian Greens". Surely, if you're starting with the oldest, the more logical place to finish would be with the newest. Of course, we know who that would be.

Email: jdstyles@optushome.com.au

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am