June 30th 2001


  Buy Issue 2611
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

Editorial :Winning elections ... or governing the country?

Canberra observed - Beazley falters in pre-election " phoney war"

Economics - Industry policy where to now?

National affairs - One.Tel collapse- shades of Fawlty Towers

Straws in the Wind

Clark allegations leave political players lost for words

Barley deregulation - Victorian ALP backs agribusiness

The Media

Letter: Insurance failures - who should pay?

Raymond Aron - an idealist with common sense

Hague self-destructs: so why won't the Tory Party?

17,000 US scientists say greenhouse theory wrong

New opportunities in life issues debate

Out of Ireland

Is news what the Big Six say it is?

60th anniversary of Baltic deportations

Film - Pearl Harbor, a film that will live in infamy

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

The Media


by John Styles

News Weekly, June 30, 2001
Political correspondent Michelle Grattan once said that Paul Keating regarded the media "as dogs to be sooled on to opponents". At the ABC the command is unnecessary. Attacking the Coalition seems to happen by instinct; and it leaves the national broadcaster looking like a Labor running dog. An example occurred recently.

On June 4 the emotive issue of nursing home standards arose during Question Time in the House of Representatives.

The Federal Opposition alleged that a Sydney nursing home owned by a Liberal Party donor had been allowed to stay open even though the Aged Care Standards Agency (ACSA) had supposedly recommended that its licence be revoked, a claim the owner later denied.

When Labor tried to question Aged Care Minister Bronwyn Bishop about her knowledge of the donation, the Speaker ruled the question out of order.

That evening the ABC Radio PM program pursued Labor's line, intensely questioning Bronwyn Bishop and also interviewing the owner of the nursing home about the question of political donations. This, of course, is fair enough, even if the ABC journalists did appear to accept the ALP's questions at face value. Bronwyn Bishop, in the event, seemed able to refute them easily.

On the question of political donations, Millie Phillips revealed that she had not only made donations to the Liberal Party but also to the Labor Party. This exposed a certain hypocrisy in Labor's attack. But the revelation didn't seem to interest the journalist. He ignored it. He sought details of her donations to Liberal Party - for example, how much and how often - but not of her gifts to the Labor Party.

Millie Phillips accused the Labor Party of using her as a "whipping post" on account of her wealth and status. In view of Bronwyn Bishop's relatively easy rebuttal of Labor's questions and the fact that the nursing home owner had donated money to both major parties, surely it was time for the ABC journalists to turn on the Labor Party.

A truly balanced package would have questioned Labor's motives and challenged the accuracy of the allegations.

The Minister's Labor accusers should have been grilled about their blatant display of hypocrisy and about the nature and number of the donations their party also received from Millie Phillips. That kind of inquiry did not happen.

Nor did the program interview a member of the ACSA who surely would have shed light on Labor's claims.

The standard of care in nursing homes is a vital public issue and deserves the keenest scrutiny. But the ABC PM package, seemed more interested in advancing Labor's case than about balanced reporting and getting to the truth of the situation at the nursing home.




The ABC could be engaging in a little wedge politics of its own if you consider the national broadcaster's resurgent enthusiasm for rural programs, with offerings like Bush Telegraph broadcast at 11 am Monday to Friday on Radio National.

The ABC is a potentially divisive question for the Coalition. On the one hand, many urban Liberals loathe the left-liberal and pro-Labor bias of its capital city-produced news and current affairs programs. On the other, the National Party embraces the regional voice of the ABC as a much needed service for its constituency.

The Nationals' "warts and all" enthusiasm for the ABC rarely, if ever, seems to distinguish between the usefulness of the medium as a rural service through, for example, its 48 regional radio stations, and the nature of the editorial content. The Coalition adage that "the ABC is our enemy talking to our friends" is particularly relevant in National Party heartland.

If, as they claim, the Nationals' constituents rely on programs like AM and PM for their insights into current affairs, is it surprising that the party is in so much electoral trouble?

By extending rural services and playing to the rural audience, ABC programmers may be fulfilling the corporation's charter obligations more comprehensively. At the same time the moves could serve to muddy the debate within Coalition ranks about ABC political bias.

Incidentally, on June 18 a new series was launched on Bush Telegraph, looking at "the changes and shifts in Australian political parties". The presenter, Helen Brown, announced that the program would run "from the oldest - the ALP - to the likely new force in the Senate, and that's the Australian Greens". Surely, if you're starting with the oldest, the more logical place to finish would be with the newest. Of course, we know who that would be.

Email: jdstyles@optushome.com.au




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm