March 24th 2018


  Buy Issue 3016
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY Media ensure a comfy rise for Bill Shorten

CANBERRA OBSERVED Can Liberals' broad church survive schism?

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Middle-East time bomb: youth unemployment

ENVIRONMENT Europe's freeze further proof of global warming!

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cashless debit card records positive results

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Liberals' Tasmanian victory: the implications

OPINION The height of absurdity: education as business

ECONOMICS AND CHINA Eyes averted from the dragon in the marketplace

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM The state attacking the Church: lessons from history

FAMILY POLITICS A Trojan horse for monitoring children

NORTH AMERICA The cultural and political mosaic that is Canada

CINEMA Mary Magdalene on film: a new interpretation

MUSIC Audio-visual: or, how to watch your music

CINEMA The Adventures of Tintin: A light amid the bleakness

BOOK REVIEW Taking arms against the gender fluid fad

BOOK REVIEW Narrative history from a great writer

LETTERS

POETRY

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Sexual exploitation at Oxfam symptom of culture of death

Books promotion page
FONT SIZE:

BOOK REVIEW
Taking arms against the gender fluid fad




News Weekly, March 24, 2018

WHEN HARRY BECAME SALLY: Responding to the Transgender Moment

by Ryan T. Anderson

Encounter Books, New York
Hardcover: 251 pages
Price: AUD$37.75

Reviewed by Dr John Whitehall

Ryan Anderson’s new book, When Harry Became Sally, will provoke many in Australia’s feminist and LGBTIQ community: the former because it insists on complementary physiological and psychological differences between males and females; the latter because it is intended to “arm” with knowledge the “ordinary Americans” who are “pushing back” against the current “transgender” phenomenon, which they recognise as “a politically correct fad built on a shaky platform”.

Anderson is a Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington and his book examines the “transgender moment” in the United States by reference to claims by its proponents, stories of those who regret transitioning to the opposite sex, consideration of essential differences between men and women and how they dovetail to raise a family, the current phenomenon of childhood gender dysphoria, and the development of laws that reflect a determination of the state to impose the ideology of gender fluidity.

Not surprisingly, the LGBTIQ supporting website, ThinkProgress, condemned the book, declaring it reinforces “patriarchal views”, is based on “junk science”, “flawed argument and distorted research”, and has nothing to offer those seeking to understand and respond compassionately to transgender people.

To the contrary, I believe the book presents a timely, lucid introduction to the current transgender phenomenon and will help readers understand the challenge to traditional values posed by the ideology and practice of gender fluidity. I believe the understanding it imparts can foster compassion for the casualties of the new ideology: that Anderson is sincere when he writes “we must be careful not to stigmatise those who are suffering … We must avoid adding to the pain experienced by people with gender dysphoria, while we present them with alternatives to transitioning.”

Simply, the aim of the book is to “advocate for the truth”, and this it does. It is not “junk science” to reaffirm that the majority of confused children will orientate to their natal sex through puberty. This truth is confirmed by researchers in the transgender phenomenon, and published in the Diagnostic and Scientific Manual of Mental Health.

It is not “junk science” to declare that no one knows why the current epidemic of childhood dysphoria has erupted and that a behavioural fad is as good an explanation as any, especially as many of the children also suffer from mental co-morbidities such as autism. It is not “junk” to conclude that children submitted to the care of gender dysphoria clinics appear to progress inexorably up an escalator of intrusive medical care that begins with social transitioning, progresses to chemical blocking of puberty, and then administration of cross-sex hormones. How many alight from this escalator before the final stages of irreversible surgery and castration is unknown.

One flaw of the book is that it does not reveal enough of the side effects of the stages of “treatment”. It describes the psychological predicament of a child entering puberty after years of being addressed, dressed and identified as the sex opposite to their natal sex, and the likelihood of continuation to the next stage of blocking that puberty with chemicals.

It mentions some effects of blocking the complex process of physical and psychological changes of puberty but neglects the work of veterinary and other scientists in Europe who have demonstrated profound and lasting alterations in the limbic systems of pre-pubertal sheep administered puberty blockers for only a matter of months. The limbic system coordinates emotion, memory and cognitive function, and leads to appropriate “executive function”.

The blockers permanently harmed the sheep. Yet proponents of their much longer use in human children argue that the chemical postponement of puberty will enable children to consider their procreative future with greater clarity. Proponents claim that the blockers are safe and the effects reversible despite mounting evidence that one of the blocked hormones plays a role in maintaining the integrity of nerve cells throughout the body.

Nor does the book consider the effect of cross-sex hormones on the growing brain despite evidence that oestrogens administered to an adult male for only months lead to shrinking of the grey matter at a rate 10 times greater than ageing. Testosterone administered to females leads to hypertrophy of the grey matter after a similar time. It needs to be emphasised that children seeking the identity of the opposite sex will need hormone treatment for life.

Nor does the book consider the details of the last phase of transition, which is surgery to remove breasts and to fashion the urogenital system towards that of the chosen gender. If the cross-sex hormones have not castrated the patient by this stage, the knife will complete the process.

Given that the majority of confused children will revert to their natal sex, and the side effects of forcing them into the opposite mould, Anderson concludes with a plea for the creation of a “network of clinicians who are ready to help those with gender dysphoria in ways that don’t endorse transgender ideology or aim to change people’s bodies”. To the doctors he adds therapists, scholars, religious leaders, lawyers and politicians.

Anderson’s plea is for a compassionate middle path between the extreme of behavioural coercion of the child back towards its natal sex and that of chemical coercion towards its opposite. He describes a compassionate middle path of “regular psychotherapy for the child and parents (for mothers may often have predisposing disturbance), parent-guided interventions in the naturalistic environment (which might comprise increased socialisation with members of their own sex, and limitations on cross dressing) and, when required, psychotropic medication for other problems such as depression and anxiety”. The idea is to try to find the problems at the root of the child’s confusion in order to help the child become comfortable with his or her chromosomal destiny.

Statistics confirm that this conservative approach of “watchful waiting” will be rewarded as the majority of children will revert to their natal sex through puberty. Studies reveal that only a minority of those who revert is likely to pursue a homosexual lifestyle. The approach presumes that such a lifestyle is preferable to a transgendered one based on brain and body-altering chemicals, intrusive surgery, and sterilisation, all maintained under a lifetime of medical supervision.

In his plea that therapists be allowed to pursue the middle path, Anderson is optimistic, if not deluded. He is here neglecting his own preceding chapter, “Policy in the common Interest”, in which he reveals the relentless progress of the American state to impose the new ideology of gender fluidity on its unwitting citizens. Graphically, he describes “gender-identity anti-discrimination laws
and policies” as “swords” for the imposition of a radical ideology, not as “shields” for civil rights. Already, he acknowledges, five U.S. states have passed laws that essentially prohibit a medical practitioner from pursuing a middle path, forcing the child onto the escalator of transgender transformation.

Are we any different in Australia? First, it must be emphasised that the newly released Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents cannot be accused of being based on “junk science”: the Guidelines profess they are not based on medical science at all, but on “clinical consensus … and a limited number of non-randomised clinical guidelines and observational studies”. This consensus will put the confused child in Australia onto the transgendering escalator with all the ideological conviction that Anderson deplores.

Second, an unwitting public should be aware of the implications of the Victorian Health Complaints Act that was passed in February 2017 and, in subsequent discussion, was revealed to be designed to prevent, among other things, “conversion therapy” of sexual minorities. The act does not mention age or predilection but could cause me to be de-registered in that state because I have talked with several mothers of confused children, pointing out the optimism of statistics and the side effects of therapy and so on without directing them to the nearest childhood gender-dysphoria clinic.

In some ways, the American legislation is “ahead” of us, but the provisions of this Victorian act exceed the United States in zeal and scope. The registration of any and all therapists (not just medical practitioners) who attempt a middle path and do not direct a confused child to a clinic that practises transition is vulnerable to the law and, incredibly, guilt is presumed before innocence.

There are already reminders to teachers and principals in NSW that they are obliged to report child abuse to authorities, and this may include parental opposition to a child identifying with the opposite sex.

The Australian Labor Party declared at its recent National Conference that it would enact laws to render illegal so called “conversion therapy”. These laws would “ensure child protection authorities acknowledge attempts to ‘cure’ gender questioning children and young people as serious psychological abuse, and would acknowledge these harms, when suffered within the family, as domestic violence against the child”.

The term “conversion (or reparative) therapy” warrants further explanation. As Anderson recognises, it is Orwellian doublespeak for any management of a confused child other than active participation in the promotion and practice of transitioning towards the opposite sex.

Anything less than that, including Anderson’s middle path, will be effectively illegal. According to the ideology of gender fluidity and its defence by the state, it is anathema to attempt to “repair” gender confusion by “converting” the child back to its chromosomal composition.

Anderson’s book is worth reading. And, given that the Australian Labor Party’s promises will affect all families in Australia, all parents should read the book.

Dr John Whitehall is Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health at Western Sydney University.


Purchase this book at the bookshop:

 



























All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

COVER STORY What religious freedoms does the Government propose removing?

VICTORIAN ELECTION The left gets ready to scream 'haters'

VICTORIAN ELECTION Coalition collapse in Victoria

COVER STORY Will Morrison and Shorten remove freedoms from faith-based schools?

CLIMATE CHANGE Good science contradicts IPCC's two-degree panic

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Immigrants caught in English-language nether world

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Regions are in no state to accommodate immigrants



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm