June 20th 2015

  Buy Issue 2950

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY Is 'same-sex marriage' a square peg in a round hole?

CANBERRA OBSERVED Rudd, Gillard squabble over slim enough legacy

HUMAN RIGHTS Conscience may be free, but its exercise ... ?

SOCIETY Children of same-sex households have a say

EDITORIAL No need for alarm over new anti-terror laws

CHILD SEX ABUSE Cardinal Pell: the bishop the media love to hate

HISTORY The diverse character of Indonesian religion

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Greece and EU stare into abyss of debt, austerity

HISTORY World War II and the origins of American unease

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Joan Kirner's legacy: VCE, Emily's List and abortion

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS China's sandcastles give its neighbours the jitters

PUBLIC HEALTH Case for legalising cannabis up in smoke

CINEMA Dystopia gives way to a little hope: Tomorrowland

BOOK REVIEW Rumours of peace

BOOK REVIEW The banality of Eichmann

PAPAL ENCYCLICAL Pope Francis reminds us to care for our common home

Books promotion page

Pope Francis reminds us to care for our common home

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, June 20, 2015

In his second encyclical, Laudato Si, Pope Francis has proposed a dialogue on the environmental problems facing the world and called on people to work together to solve the challenges facing us in advancing human welfare and respecting the natural environment.

Pope Francis

The formal title of the 82-page document consists of the first two words of the encyclical, translated as “Praise be to You”, the first words of a canticle written by St Francis of Assisi: “Praise be to You, my Lord, through our Sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us.”

Contrary to the media hype sur­rounding the document, it is not mainly concerned with the contentious issue of global warming. Pope Francis has given his encyclical the subtitle, “On care for our common home”, and he appeals to us “to bring the whole human family together to seek a sustainable and integral development, for we know that things can change”.


His inspiration is St Francis of Assisi, and his description of this extraordinary saint tells us a great deal about Pope Francis himself.

He writes: “I believe that St Francis is the example par excellence of care for the vulnerable and of an integral eco­logy lived out joyfully and authentically.

“He is the patron saint of all who study and work in the area of ecology, and he is also much loved by non-Christians. He was particularly concerned for God’s creation and for the poor and outcast. He loved, and was deeply loved for his joy, his generous self-giving, his open-heartedness.

“He was a mystic and a pilgrim who lived in simplicity and in wonderful harmony with God, with others, with nature and with himself. He shows us just how inseparable the bond is between concern for nature, justice for the poor, commitment to society, and interior peace.”

The Pope says that St Francis helps us to see that an integral ecology calls for openness to categories that transcend the language of mathematics and biology, and take us to the heart of what it is to be human.

“Just as happens when we fall in love with someone, whenever [St Francis] would gaze at the sun, the moon or the smallest of animals, he burst into song, drawing all other creatures into his praise. He communed with all creation, even preaching to the flowers, inviting them ‘to praise the Lord, just as if they were endowed with reason’.”


The encyclical has six chapters, which deserve to be read in full. The first, “What is happening to our common home”, looks at the challenges caused by industrialisation and development, particularly development that ignores the common good.

Pope Francis writes: “But a sober look at our world shows that the degree of human intervention, often in the service of business interests and consumerism, is actually making our earth less rich and beautiful, ever more limited and grey, even as technological advances and consumer goods continue to abound limitlessly. We seem to think that we can substitute an irreplaceable and irretrievable beauty with something which we have created ourselves.”

The Pope begins with a critique of our throwaway culture, which contributes to the prevalence of pollution and waste.

He notes the presence of both atmos­pheric pollution and pollution of the soil and waterways, and says: “Each year hundreds of millions of tonnes of waste are generated, much of it non-biodegradable, highly toxic and radio­active, from homes and businesses, from construction and demolition sites, from clinical, electronic and industrial sources. The earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth.”

While this is tragically true in much of the developing world, in general the developed world has instituted means of reducing waste, and given a high priority to protection of the environment, to the benefit of all.

This is a consequence of the fact that development produces wealth, part of which can be used to deal with the negative effects of industrial activity.

The Pope corrects any impression that he or the Church does not welcome the contribution of science and technology to human improvement. In fact, he specifically endorses their role in contributing to human welfare. But he adds that neither science nor economics should determine public policy, but the common good of all and the importance of preserving what God has given us.

He also says that it is not the role of the Church to determine the science, but to listen respectfully to what science has to say.

Pope Francis expresses concerns about global warming, saying that “a solid scientific consensus” indicates we are witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system, accompanied by rising sea levels and more extreme climatic events, such as cyclones and hurricanes.

However, this “consensus”, prom­oted by bodies like the IPCC, does not accord with actual measurements of global temperatures since the 1990s, and there is little evidence of any significant rising sea levels, or melting ice-caps, or more frequent extreme climate events, after two centuries of industrialisation.

Of course, the evidence can be cherry-picked to produce almost any conclusion one wants, because the climate system is so complex. This is a scientific issue, not a theological one.

The Pope also gives attention to the critical need for the protection of water resources, and ensuring its availability to the poor.

He criticises the “population control” policies advanced by international agencies: “At times, developing countries face forms of international pressure which make economic assistance contingent on certain policies of ‘reproductive health’,” and says that “demographic growth is fully compatible with an integral and shared development”.

He adds: “To blame population growth instead of extreme and selective consumerism on the part of some, is one way of refusing to face the issues. It is an attempt to legitimise the present model of distribution, where a minority believes that it has the right to consume in a way which can never be universal­ised, since the planet could not even contain the waste products of such consumption.”


Pope Francis then examines “The Gospel of Creation”, and proposes an intense dialogue between religion and science to the benefit of both.

He says: “We are not God. The earth was here before us and it has been given to us. Although it is true that we Christians have at times incorrectly interpreted the Scriptures, nowadays we must forcefully reject the notion that our being created in God’s image and given dominion over the earth justifies absolute domination over other creatures.

“The biblical texts are to be read in their context, with an appropriate hermeneutic, recognising that they tell us to ‘till and keep’ the garden of the world (cf Genesis 2:15). ‘Tilling’ refers to cultivating, ploughing or working, while ‘keeping’ means caring, protecting, overseeing and preserving.

“This implies a relationship of mutual responsibility between human beings and nature. Each community can take from the bounty of the earth whatever it needs for subsistence, but it also has the duty to protect the earth and to ensure its fruitfulness for coming generations.”

Chapter 3, on “The human roots of the ecological crisis”, concedes that there are many causes of the environmental problems around the world, but the Holy Father suggests that many problems of today’s world stem from a tendency to look for solutions from economics and technology regardless of their effects on either mankind or the human environment.

In the course of his critique of contemporary thinking, Pope Francis makes the point that concern for the protection of nature is also incompatible with the justification of abortion. “How can we genuinely teach the importance of concern for other vulnerable beings, however troublesome or inconvenient they may be, if we fail to protect a human embryo, even when its presence is uncomfortable and creates difficulties?” he asks.

The next chapter deals with what the Pope calls an “integral ecology”, in which “the analysis of environmental problems cannot be separated from the analysis of human, family, work-related and urban contexts, nor from how individuals relate to themselves, which leads in turn to how they relate to others and to the environment.”

In Chapter 5, Pope Francis calls for global cooperation to solve the world’s major problems. “The same ingenuity which has brought about enormous technological progress has so far proved incapable of finding effective ways of dealing with grave environmental and social problems worldwide,” he says.

“A global consensus is essential for confronting the deeper problems, which cannot be resolved by unilateral actions on the part of individual countries.”

His discussion here reflects the complexity of issues such as planning for large development projects. He says: “Environmental impact assessment should not come after the drawing up of a business proposition or the proposal of a particular policy, plan or program.

“It should be part of the process from the beginning, and be carried out in a way which is interdisciplinary, transparent and free of all economic or political pressure. It should be linked to a study of working conditions and possible effects on people’s physical and mental health, on the local economy and on public safety.

“Economic returns can thus be forecast more realistically, taking into account potential scenarios and the eventual need for further investment to correct possible undesired effects.

“A consensus should always be reached between the different stake­holders, who can offer a variety of approaches, solutions and alternatives.

“The local population should have a special place at the table; they are concerned about their own future and that of their children, and can consider goals transcending immediate economic interest.”

He adds: “This does not mean being opposed to any technological innovations which can bring about an improvement in the quality of life. But it does mean that profit cannot be the sole criterion to be taken into account, and that, when significant new information comes to light, a reassessment should be made, with the involvement of all interested parties.”

Economic determinism

The Pope is also critical of economic determinism. He says: “The financial crisis of 2007-08 provided an oppor­tunity to develop a new economy, more attentive to ethical principles, and new ways of regulating speculative financial practices and virtual wealth.

“But the response to the crisis did not include rethinking the outdated criteria which continue to rule the world.

“The problem of the real economy is not confronted with vigour, yet it is the real economy which makes diversification and improvement in production possible, helps companies to function well, and enables small and medium businesses to develop and create employment.”

Finally, Pope Francis urges an awareness of our common origin, of our mutual belonging, and of a future to be shared with everyone.

“This basic awareness would enable the development of new convictions, attitudes and forms of life,” he says, “A great cultural, spiritual and educational challenge stands before us, and it will demand that we set out on the long path of renewal.”

Pope Francis’ encyclical is intended to be the start of a dialogue on how mankind can honour and respect all creation, as St Francis of Assisi did.

The Pope says: “May our struggles and our concern for this planet never take away the joy of our hope.”

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am