May 23rd 2015

  Buy Issue 2948

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY No deal in federal budget for single-income families

CANBERRA OBSERVED Mixed budget: 'Battlers' put on the backburner

SOCIETY Marriage myths do not stand up to close scrutiny

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Supreme Court argument goes to heart of marriage

POLITICS Understanding Orwell: the dangers of ideology

EDITORIAL Executive salaries: Telstra CEO bells the cat

ECONOMICS Productivity: do we understand it at all?

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS UK election: implications of Conservative victory

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Floating reasons to build our submarines here

CINEMA Best-laid plans oft end in corruption

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS New fronts in the fight against human trafficking

EDUCATION Non-government school tuition trumps SES status

CLIMATE CHANGE Bjorn again sceptics show face of intolerance

DRUGS Ice: an epidemic rages under our very noses

BOOK REVIEW The man who would not be prime minister

BOOK REVIEW The father of the green revolution

Books promotion page

Ice: an epidemic rages under our very noses

by Ross Colquhoun

News Weekly, May 23, 2015

Ice (methamphetamine, or crystal meth) is quite different from other drugs of dependence in three important ways.

Crystal methamphetamine, or ice.

For nicotine, alcohol and cannabis, the harm often manifests many years after initiation of use despite the inherent dangers. Not so with ice. The harm becomes severe and intolerable very early on. This is almost invariably the case as use quickly becomes compulsive due to the highly addictive nature of the drug.

The result is that the time using ice tends to be much shorter. Before too long consequences become so severe, both to the user and their immediate environment including family, that change is inevitable, either cycling in and out of use or cessation, either spontaneous or due to forced withdrawal in prison or hospitalisation.

This difference in patterns of use is likely to impact on the raw statistics in an unpredictable way and indicate much lower use of the drug than actually is the case. At any point in time the number of users will seem much lower, despite the consequences being more noticeable, compared with total numbers who have used the drug because of the shorter average time using.

The second point of difference is that ice stimulates compulsive sexual acting out. While other drugs stimulate sexual appetite, none does more so than ice: Not only enhanced desire and sexual performance but risky sexual behaviour.

The third difference is that conventional treatment is largely ineffective. Those who become dependent on the drug do not seek treatment until after an average of three years from initial use and not until symptoms become very severe, and they do not stay long in treatment.

Facts and figures disseminated by the National Drug Strategy Survey and the Australian Crime Commission inform us of the extent of the ice epidemic. Noticeably, Australia has one of the highest rates of use of methamphetamine in the world, particularly among developed countries, increasing 10 per cent since 2011; drug seizures are at record levels and the weight of amphetamine-type drugs detections has increased 230 per cent from 2010-11 to 2012-13.

Among those with experience working in the field and reviewing the research, it seems that the main strategies to reduce social harm from ice use involves supply-and-demand reduction, rather than about users’ rights or harm reduction. This is due to the associated high levels of mental illness, crime and violence, harm to family members and the community, the highly addictive nature of the drugs and the high-risk sexual behaviour.

Of great concern is the potential spread of HIV and STDs between drug users and into the non-drug-using community associated with methamphetamine use. Methamphetamine use has been found to be independently related to prostitution, sex with injecting drug users and having a sexually transmitted disease. The inherent dangers of this drug to users and the community have been apparent for some time and yet policy does not reflect the urgency to implement effective strategies needed to avert a looming social crisis.

Not only are no practical harm reduction measures available, including drug substitutes, but treatment is difficult as users are unlikely to seek or engage in treatment. However, particularly heavy or dependent users (some 73,000 in Australia) are more likely to come into contact with law enforcement and the courts and, as a result, the court system has an important role in responding to ice-related problems and dependence.

There exists an opportunity for the courts and health systems to take an integrated approach along the following lines. Mandatory detention is of vital importance in any treatment response as it takes some time to go through withdrawal (psychosis/depression) and it is virtually impossible to retain people in treatment during this phase. As crime is so closely linked to stimulant use, some period of detention (three months) is legitimate, justified and necessary for effective treatment.

Specifically designed ice prisons/detention centres need to be established, as happens in other jurisdictions (such as Canada).

Focus needs to be integrated with health/mental health services responding to withdrawal and other health problems (cardiovascular, dental, STDs, HIV and so on), drug and alcohol services focusing on education about the harm and psychological and social change required, and an out-reach service (like parole) to monitor progress and prevent relapse by intervening in other social risk factors, especially among indigenous communities.

In other words, instead of diversion into health or treatment services, which have failed, involuntary treatment including dedicated prisons need to be a part of those health and treatment services for treatment to be effective. Civil libertarians will be up in arms, but if we are to tackle this very serious and growing problem, an integrated and uncompromising approach as suggested is imperative.

As there is no evidence that the harm-minimisation policies have benefited users or the community and with the looming ice crisis, perhaps we can learn from the experience of Sweden. Sweden went from being one of the first European countries to experience a large-scale drug problem in the 1960s to now being a country with one of the lowest rates of drug use.

Dr Ross Colquhoun is an executive member of Drug Free Australia and research fellow and a member o the Drug Advisory Council of Australia.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am