March 28th 2015


  Buy Issue 2944
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL Tony Abbott's last chance

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition government switches to survival mode

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS If Abbott can back Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank...

HUMAN RIGHTS Re-establishing the right to freedom of religion and conscience

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Intergenerational Report: a waste of time and money

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS Two problems the PM must tackle boldly

QUEENSLAND After Cyclone Marcia: balancing drought relief and flood mitigation

AUSTRALIA Builders of a nation: Henry Bolte and Charles Court

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Putin admits military takeover of Crimea in 2014

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION The rediscovery of Christopher Dawson

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION Acknowledging the debt we owe Alfred the Great

SOCIETY The left's all-out war on truth

LETTERS

OBITUARY Fantasy author Terry Pratchett: an appreciation

BOOK REVIEW The very best of enemies

BOOK REVIEW Dutch warning on where euthanasia leads

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

BOOK REVIEW
The very best of enemies




News Weekly, March 28, 2015

 

A GREAT AND GLORIOUS ADVENTURE:
A Military History of the Hundred Years War

by Gordon Corrigan

(London: Atlantic Books)
Paperback: 320 pages
ISBN: 9781848879270
Price: AUD$29.95

 

Reviewed by Michael E. Daniel

 

For those used to reading accounts of the two world wars, it is hard to imagine that Britain and France, which fought alongside each other in the 20th century, were for many centuries traditional enemies.

British military historian Gordon Corrigan examines the longest-lasting conflict between the two nations, namely the Hundred Years War. Despite its name, the conflict lasted 116 years, from 1337 to 1453.

Corrigan’s book is described as a military history, but it also provides a comprehensive political background to the conflict.

The first chapter recounts English history from the 1066 Norman Conquest of England until the events which led to the outbreak of the Hundred Years War.

Edward III claimed the French throne because he was the grandson of Philip IV of France through his mother, Isabella. This claim was rejected by the French authorities, who decreed that only succession through the male line was legitimate.

Other contributing factors to the war were Edward having to swear allegiance to the French crown because he was also the Duke of Gascony, and France’s “Auld Alliance” with Scotland, a country England was trying to subdue.

The Hundred Years War can be divided into three distinct phases.

The first phase, lasting from 1337 to 1360, saw English success against the French, particularly in the battles of Crécy (1346) and Poitiers (1356) and the capture of Calais. This phase ended with the Treaty of Brétigny (1360).

The second phase dates from 1360, when war resumed, after France and England had been involved in a peripheral war regarding the disputed succession in the Spanish kingdom of Castile. During the reign of Richard II, English gains made during the first phase of the war were gradually lost. One of the causes of Richard’s unpopularity, which culminated in his deposition by Henry of Bolingbroke (who was thereupon crowned Henry IV in 1399), was Richard’s reluctance to pursue the war.

The third phase coincided with the period when the Lancastrian kings were in power. The first of them, Henry IV, was constrained in what he could do, largely because of sporadic internal disputes in England.

However, his son Henry V — later popularised by Shakespeare as “the mirror of all Christian kings” — significantly advanced the English cause in 1415, with the siege of the French port of Harfleur, and his later victory at Agincourt over the numerically superior French army.

Henry married Catherine of Valois, the daughter of the king of France. He died, however, before he could subdue France.

His son, the infant Henry VI, was crowned king of France in Paris; but the French gradually regained their territory. When peace was concluded in 1453, the only French territory England retained was the port of Calais.

Corrigan maintains that the English success during much of the Hundred Years War owed much to its superior strategy and weaponry. In three major battles, the English archers’ long-bows had a greater range and were more lethal than the French crossbows and other weaponry.

Furthermore, although the English generally fought with fewer soldiers, the soldiers they put into the field were generally better trained. They also tended to fight defensively, positioning themselves before the battle in strategically favourable positions and forcing the French forces to fight.

This is not to say that English strategy did not evolve. Earlier commanders, such as Edward the Black Prince, tended to mistreat captured civilians in order to inspire terror among the French. Henry V, however, tended to treat them well, working on the premise that he was their legitimate monarch. It was only those who resisted whom he treated harshly, because, in his mind, they were rebels.

Furthermore, the English made good use of technological advances. Cannons were first used during Henry IV’s reign, and were utilised more extensively under Henry V. Corrigan argues that one key factor in the ultimate French success was France’s adoption of some of the strategies that had made English success possible earlier in the war.

However, Corrigan notes that on numerous occasions the English failed to capitalise on successes in battles and skirmishes. He observes that, at various key points, England could have won the war.

For example, in 1355 the Black Prince’s raid had so weakened the French army and economy that England could have been victorious — that is, had England not simultaneously been deploying its troops to fight its neighbour, Scotland. Similarly, Corrigan speculates that, had Henry V lived longer, England might ultimately have prevailed over the French.

Corrigan also argues that the war solidified the distinct national identities of the French and the English. The long-running conflict also saw the decline in the use of heavily-armed cavalry, in favour of weapons such as the longbow and cannon.

Military successes achieved by either side underscored the importance of possessing a well-trained though smaller army, as opposed to a large but ill-trained force.

The Hundred Years War ended in 1453; but it wasn’t until 1801 that the English finally abandoned their claim to the French throne.

After the 1789 French Revolution and the downfall of the monarchy, Britain supported the Bourbon dynasty in the latter’s desire to be restored to the French throne. It would have looked singularly anomalous if Britain had been simultaneously seeking the French throne for itself.

Gordon Corrigan’s work is thoroughly researched and lucidly written. His descriptions of the battles, and of military aspects such as strategy, weapons, and structure of the army are clearly explained, and require no particular military expertise on the part of the reader.

Unfortunately, his dismissal of the significance of religion is problematic. He views religion as a essentially a tool used by the powerful to subjugate and control people. When recounting the role Joan of Arc played in galvanising French morale, he dismisses any suggestion that she received authentic visions.

Nevertheless, despite the author’s negative view of religion, this book is a fascinating and valuable study of a tumultuous period of Anglo-French relations, and is written so as to be accessible to the general reader.

Michael E. Daniel is a Melbourne-based writer. 


Purchase this book at the bookshop:

 



























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm