March 28th 2015


  Buy Issue 2944
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL Tony Abbott's last chance

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition government switches to survival mode

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS If Abbott can back Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank...

HUMAN RIGHTS Re-establishing the right to freedom of religion and conscience

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Intergenerational Report: a waste of time and money

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS Two problems the PM must tackle boldly

QUEENSLAND After Cyclone Marcia: balancing drought relief and flood mitigation

AUSTRALIA Builders of a nation: Henry Bolte and Charles Court

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Putin admits military takeover of Crimea in 2014

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION The rediscovery of Christopher Dawson

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION Acknowledging the debt we owe Alfred the Great

SOCIETY The left's all-out war on truth

LETTERS

OBITUARY Fantasy author Terry Pratchett: an appreciation

BOOK REVIEW The very best of enemies

BOOK REVIEW Dutch warning on where euthanasia leads

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

LETTERS




News Weekly, March 28, 2015

Aboriginal assimilation

Sir,

In his recent article “The folly of Australia’s public intellectuals” (News Weekly, February 28, 2015), Dr Hal G.P. Colebatch comments on the absence in these intellectuals’ deliberations of figures indicating the numbers of Aboriginals who, before the advent of the Aboriginal Rights Movement in the 1960s, “successfully completed a Western education and secured employment”.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) figures for the Aboriginal population across the 20th century give some notion of what that might have been.

The Act of Parliament setting up the Census provided that census forms be delivered to and collected from every door, and be completed by the occupants. Moreover, it made compliance compulsory, relying on the high level of literacy of the settled population. Clearly, this expectation was unfulfillable by and for Aborigines still living in tribal conditions, and for this reason the legal obligation was waived in their case.

Instead, the ABS Year Book reports variously estimated and enumerated figures for “full-blood” and “half-caste” Aboriginals, and sometimes referred to unrecorded numbers of persons “outside the influence of Europeans”.

Despite this uncertainty, the totals remain fairly steady, fluctuating between 70,000 and 80,000, up till the 1960s when Aboriginals were formally included in the Census.

Thereafter, the distinction between “full-blood” and “half-caste” was abolished, and further, persons of primarily non-indigenous descent could register as Aboriginal. Registration as Aboriginal depended purely on self-nomination.

In 1961 the Aboriginal population recorded in the ABS Year Book numbered 79,000. In 1971, it had risen to 100,000; in 1981, to 140,000; and in 1991, to 265,000.

Clearly, this was not natural increase, but must to a major extent reflect persons who had previously assimilated sufficiently into the Australian community to have participated in the Census under the prevailing conditions.

If “full-blood” and “half-caste” Aboriginals maintained the stable numbers of the previous seven decades, we can surmise (allowing for births and deaths) that at least 196,000 Aboriginals had received an Australian education, were normally employed, and conformed to the social mores of the time.

If, as is likely, not all Australians with Aboriginal ancestry chose to self-nominate, the number would be far greater.

Lucy Sullivan,
Seaford, SA

 

 

Institutionalised childcare

Sir,

I would like to congratulate Terri Kelleher for her perceptive article on institutional childcare (News Weekly, March 14, 2015).

Australia spends $9 billion a year on child subsidies at an average of $7,000 per child, and yet only one in four children is cared for in institutions. Three out of four are cared for by mum, dad, grandparents and friends.

The childcare industry’s drive to entice mothers into paid employment began with Harold Holt, when he was Minister for Labour and National Service in the 1960s.

Half a century on, after all this time and expense, only 25 per cent of children are cared for by the state!

I worked in Canberra in a senior position in the Office of Child Care, so I know that the large subsidies generally only cater for the 20 per cent of mothers who are career-orientated.

The 20 per cent who wish to nurture their own children are only given Family Tax B, which was recently reduced. The 60 per cent of mothers who wish to have part-time jobs receive less support.

John Barich,
Claremont, WA




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm