March 28th 2015

  Buy Issue 2944

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL Tony Abbott's last chance

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition government switches to survival mode

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS If Abbott can back Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank...

HUMAN RIGHTS Re-establishing the right to freedom of religion and conscience

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Intergenerational Report: a waste of time and money

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS Two problems the PM must tackle boldly

QUEENSLAND After Cyclone Marcia: balancing drought relief and flood mitigation

AUSTRALIA Builders of a nation: Henry Bolte and Charles Court

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Putin admits military takeover of Crimea in 2014

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION The rediscovery of Christopher Dawson

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION Acknowledging the debt we owe Alfred the Great

SOCIETY The left's all-out war on truth


OBITUARY Fantasy author Terry Pratchett: an appreciation

BOOK REVIEW The very best of enemies

BOOK REVIEW Dutch warning on where euthanasia leads

Books promotion page

If Abbott can back Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank...

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, March 28, 2015

While the Commonwealth government’s infrastructure development program proceeds at a snail’s pace, the Prime Minister Mr Tony Abbott has announced that Australia is likely to support China’s planned US$100 billion Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).

Tony Abbott

Mr Abbott’s move followed announcements by the UK, France, Germany and Italy that they will support the new bank. This has paved the way for Australia to follow suit, after earlier moves were shelved because of resistance from the United States. Twenty-seven nations have agreed to join the new agency.

Development experts say that globally as much as US$5 trillion is needed annually to fund infrastructure, stimulate global economic growth and employment.[1] This huge public sector investment is needed after the 2007/08 global financial crisis (GFC) left major economies carrying mountains of debt that may take generations to repay.

Further, the global consulting firm, McKinsey’s, recently revealed that the debt of the major economies has increased, not fallen, since the start of the GFC in 2007. It has soared from US$142 trillion to US$199 trillion, i.e., by 40 per cent.[2]

This debt mountain will leave the global economy sluggish, with many economies operating well below capacity, and unemployment at unacceptably high levels for the next 20 years, or more. Just as high unemployment is causing political instability in Europe, it is now causing unrest in the Abbott government.

Until recently, Australia was able to avoid the fate of the U.S. and European economies, which have been suffering “the long recession” — economic stagnation and high unemployment.

That has all changed. Now, the Australian economy faces serious risks and major structural problems. The sluggish global economy has seen a collapse in demand for our mineral exports.

Further, Australia is carrying a higher level of household debt today than at the start of the GFC and has a bubble in the property market that could burst, according to McKinsey’s debt report. It was the final bursting of the U.S. property bubble, fed by excessive subprime lending, that led to the GFC and seven years of depressed global economic activity.

Relying on traditional monetary policy — lowering interest rates to stimulate growth and employment — will not work in today’s economic climate. So far this year, 14 central banks have cut interest rates. Sweden, Switzerland and Denmark have cut their deposit rates below zero. Yet these measures have failed to lift economic growth in these countries.

Lower interest rates alone won’t solve Australia’s structural problems, such as the shrinking of our manufacturing sector, the closing down of our car industry, the parlous state of our rural sector, and the end of the mining boom.

Officially, Australian unemployment is 795,000 (6.4 per cent), although Roy Morgan Research puts unemployment at 1.2 million, and unemployment plus under-employment at 2.4 million (20.3 per cent).

Worse, governments want to reduce debt by cutting the public sector, which will add to unemployment levels. Regardless of how low bank interest rates fall, businesses won’t invest if consumers, worried about rising unemployment, won’t buy their products and services.

Voters are reacting. They have turned out Coalition governments in Victoria and Queensland after only one term in office. One-term governments have not been seen in Australia since the 1930s Great Depression.

The Abbott government’s poor showing in the polls reflects growing concern at rising unemployment.

So what is the solution?

Last year, the International Monetary Fund said that the solution is public investment in infrastructure. Leading Harvard university economist Larry Summers has said that governments may have to inject financial capital into their economies, permanently.

China’s new Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank aims to boost Asian economic growth through infrastructure investment.

It begs the question: if Australia can back this infrastructure investment bank, why can’t Australia create its own infrastructure development finance corporation?

If Tony Abbott wants to be the “infrastructure prime minister”, he urgently needs to reinvigorate his foundering infrastructure vision.

Late last year, government figures showed that public spending on capital works actually shrank in each of first three quarters of 2014.[3]

The Prime Minister will also have to find a new way to fund his vision. His original plan was to co-fund state programs, on the condition that the states undertook major asset sales.

However, that policy appears dead in the water after Queenslanders at their recent state election clearly voted “no” to further asset sales, when they replaced the Campbell Newman Liberal National Party (LNP) government after only one term.

Former deputy secretary of the Department of Trade Colin Teese has outlined how governments can fund infrastructure without increasing government debt, and how a bipartisan agreement is needed for coalescing a wide-ranging group of experts to map out a long-term national infrastructure program (see pages 9–10 of this issue).

If the Prime Minister can take charge of economic policy and drive major infrastructure projects, the economy will grow, unemployment will fall and dissention in government ranks will fade away.

Patrick J. Byrne is national vice-president of the National Civic Council.


[1] “UK to join China-backed development bank”, Business Spectator, March 13, 2015.

[2] Richard Dobbs, Susan Lund, Jonathan Woetzel, and Mina Mutafchieva, “Debt and (not much) deleveraging”, McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) Report, February 2015.

[3] “Tony Abbott risks recession as his infrastructure pledge falters”, Sydney Morning Herald, December 5, 2014.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am