August 2nd 2014

  Buy Issue 2929

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL Putin to blame for shooting down MH17

FOREIGN AFFAIRS Indonesia's President-elect Joko Widodo

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Same-sex marriage polls flawed: National Marriage Coalition

RURAL AFFAIRS Rabobank report highlights need for new rural policies

SOCIETY The worldview that makes the underclass

AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING How Australia can rebuild its car industry

SCHOOLS History of ideas course offered to Year 10 students

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY IVF: the unspoken risks for mothers and babies

OPINION Childcare debate has become 'cold and inhuman'

WESTERN AUSTRALIA New report on the sexualisation of children

OPINION Climate debate should begin after death of carbon tax

AUSTRALIAN HISTORY When John Wren took on communist Frank Hardy

UNITED KINGDOM Britain's ever-shrinking armed forces


CINEMA Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

BOOK REVIEW The tunnellers of Holzminden POW camp

Books promotion page

Same-sex marriage polls flawed: National Marriage Coalition

by Gerard Calilhanna

News Weekly, August 2, 2014

A longer, fully-referenced version of the following article appears in the attached PDF file.

Rodney Croome AM,
national convenor of Australian
Marriage Equality (AME)

During the last sitting week of Parliament before the winter recess, two polls were released claiming 1) that Australia had decided in favour of same-sex “marriage”, 2) that opposition to it had collapsed, and 3) that there was no reason to delay legislation.

This followed Ian Thorpe’s disclosure of his sexual identity in a paid television interview with Michael Parkinson, broadcast on Sunday, July 13. Thorpe’s disclosure of a private matter has nothing to do with redefining marriage, nor should it.

The next day, in the Financial Review, the senator for New South Wales, David Leyonhjelm (Liberal Democrat, NSW), announced his intention to introduce a same-sex marriage bill — one which, in his words, would “deregulate marriage”, by relegating it to the private sphere.

Right-wing columnist Andrew Bolt, in his blog, took issue with Senator Leyonhjelm, saying: “Truth is that marriage — the institution, tradition and ceremony — are indeed all public matters. Marriage is a social, not private, construct to bind men to women for the sake of their children, so that the next generations are properly socialised to the benefit of all.

“Then there is this problem with Leyonhjelm’s argument: if your choice of partner is entirely a private matter, and state intrusion on that choice silly and petty, then why have any state definition of marriage at all?

“Why not allow polygamy and incestuous marriage as well? Isn’t that the true libertarian position?”

Ian Thorpe’s public self-disclosure and Senator Leyonhjelm’s proposal to “privatise” marriage come in the wake of long-running campaigns waged by Labor and the Greens to promote same-sex marriage.

Labor opposition deputy leader Tanya Plibersek has sought to legalise homosexual marriage, preferably with the support of a co-sponsor from the Coalition, and has called upon Prime Minister Tony Abbott to grant Liberal and National party members a conscience vote on the issue.

In May, South Australian Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young introduced legislation in the Senate to recognise same-sex marriages contracted overseas.

She has insisted that such a change would leave the definition of marriage in the Marriage Act intact. But, in reality, it would introduce a rival definition of marriage to the current one, and would undermine the traditional definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman.

The week after Ian Thorpe’s televised interview, two polls appeared.

To great fanfare, the Crosby Textor Group published the results of a survey commissioned by the Australian Marriage Equality (AME) lobby organisation. Crosby Textor is the Liberal Party’s national pollster.

The survey had a relatively small survey size, n=1,000, with a margin of error claimed at ±3.1%, and this was used to make a wide number of claims.

The full survey data itself has not been made available to date. The question order and structure have not been revealed, but can be inferred from three articles by Mark Textor, Lisa Cox (Sydney Morning Herald, July 15, 2014) and Patricia Karvelas (The Australian, July 17, 2014).

The Crosby Textor poll boldly asserts that a record 72 per cent of Australians favour “marriage equality” (with strong support across all key demographics), and that three-quarters of the population, including a majority who oppose same-sex marriage, favour a free vote.

But closer scrutiny of the kinds of questions asked casts doubt on the veracity of the whole study of only 1,000 respondents. The devil lies in the available detail.

The most that can be said for the polling is that it reveals a growing base level of support for homosexual marriage, as indicated by the 39 per cent, identified by Newspoll, as being “strongly in favour”.

In this respect, Newspoll has far greater credibility than the Crosby Textor poll, but it has its own problems.

In terms of polling to be used to change existing laws, the onus should be upon the pollster to reveal a population basis for this change. The claims of both polls clearly fall short.

What little is known of the questions that Crosby Textor posed to participants does not fill one with confidence about the accuracy of its conclusions.

The wording of the questions was poor and clumsy. The number of people sampled was too small to justify Crosby Textor’s conclusion that such a high proportion of respondents were “strongly in favour” of marriage equality.

The upshot of all this is that, despite the enormous, sustained propaganda push by politicians, journalists and the mass media, according to Newspoll, 47 per cent of respondents are still finding their way on the issue.

The Coalition can and should retain its policy in favour of traditional marriage and not be swayed by these “results”. Same-sex marriage inflicts great harm on the institution of marriage, and all marriages, by virtue of its complete redefinition.

Gerard Calilhanna is coordinator of the National Marriage Coalition. A much longer, fully-referenced version of this article appears in the attached PDF file

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am