July 5th 2014

  Buy Issue 2927

Articles from this issue:

FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: Why the right to conscientious objection must be restored

EDUCATION: Safe Schools program to promote 'sexual diversity'

CONSERVATION: Bats, barmy bureaucrats and other protected pests

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Carbon tax to be litmus test for new Senate

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Flawed inquiry ignores Chinese investment in real estate

EDITORIAL: Boycott AFL football on Good Friday!

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Euthanasia bill to come before Australian parliament

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Has Gates Foundation stopped funding abortion?

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Ukrainian borderlands soaked with blood again

UNITED STATES: Christians persecuted in U.S. armed forces and high schools

OPINION: Daycare impacts on infants' bonding and attachment

AUSTRALIAN HISTORY: AMA honours doctor who served people of Nauru during WW2


CULTURE: Information technology and the culture wars

BOOK REVIEW Rational rejoinder to 'sexual diversity' lobby

BOOK REVIEW Poet, spy and fugitive from North Korea

Books promotion page

Bats, barmy bureaucrats and other protected pests

by Julia Patrick

News Weekly, July 5, 2014

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act of 1999 is a pernicious piece of legislation that has progressively enmeshed rural Australia in green tape, while defying reason in the protection it gives to some animals.

Chris Gulaptis MLA
(National Party, NSW).

So, as the animal “protection” lobby continues to put the rights of domestic trouble-makers — particularly bats (euphemistically called flying foxes) and possums — over the well-being of humans, the environmental bureaucracy is on the same side.

In 2011, when the bat population in the Queensland town of Gayndah grew to explosive numbers, defecating everywhere and polluting the town’s water supply, the state government’s Department of Environment and Resource Management was called in.

But their field officer was unsympathetic, requiring lengthy data before a “dispersal plan” could be implemented and forbidding any disruption to the bat colony until every baby bat could fly. It was all to ensure that the bats would not feel “unnecessary or unreasonable stress”, because, said the field officer, “bats have rights”.

As the bat population grew from 50,000 to 300,000, a frustrated local real estate agent, seeing bats destroying the once-attractive town, asked the obvious question: “Why are they protected?”

In the New South Wales coastal town of Maclean, bats outnumber residents by a ratio of over 100 to one. One irate resident summed up the community’s frustration, saying: “I just can’t see why the politicians don’t choose humans over bats.” The NSW state government’s response was to form “a multi-agency and stakeholders’ working group in the Department of the Environment”.

Fortunately, former mayor and now National Party state MP, Mr Chris Gulaptis, is taking a different tack. He says it’s time “to reclaim the town for humans”, and his anti-bat campaign is, not surprisingly, gaining enthusiastic support.

Meanwhile, bats continue to decimate the trees in botanic gardens, suburban parks and orchards from northern Queensland to the suburbs of Melbourne. More than 450,000 bats live in the Sydney metropolitan area alone.

But a plethora of state and federal environmental laws make attempts at “dispersal” and “relocation” of “protected species” a bureaucratic nightmare, now that the protection of the species trumps the need for a civilised human life.

In 2003, as 28,000 bats were slowly destroying the trees in Melbourne’s Royal Botanic Gardens, a “noise dispersal” technique was introduced — a sudden cacophony of ear-piercing sound that sent the bats flying — off to Geelong, Warrnambool and Melbourne’s Yarra Bend Park. There, in a macabre setting, bats now hang from the branches of denuded trees — hundreds to a tree — in a relocation attempt, costing over $3 million.

Undeterred, Sydney’s Royal Botanic Gardens produced a similar plan, as, there too, bats threatened its unique, historically significant trees with extinction.

But the plan met a court challenge by Bat Advocacy, supported by the Environmental Defenders’ Office (EDO), an expensive outfit set up by Julia Gillard.

Fortunately, last September’s federal election intervened. Before the EDO could do further harm, Tony Abbott’s incoming Coalition government axed the Environmental Defenders’ Office, and, after years of legal wrangle, the $2.2 million-dollar noise-dispersal plan took off.

But bats don’t just disappear. New arrivals have met hostile receptions in other parts of suburban Sydney, and the bat problem remains unsolved.

Bat-lovers and the Department of Primary Industry (just who do they really represent?) claim that bats play an important role in pollinating native flowers and spreading seeds.

In contrast, AgForce Queensland — a body representing Queensland’s beef, sheep and grain producers — rates bats, along with feral animals and the rabies virus, as a “pest species plaguing Queensland”.

Bats harbour a range of viruses, including the deadly Hendra and Lyssa ones that can infect humans with a bite or scratch.

But activists of Bat Conservation & Rescue Queensland Inc. are undismayed, encouraging their “Adopt a Bat” program, including a “Bat Adoption Gift Pack” with information on bat care and supporters encouraged to shop at Batgoods.com.

Donors are encouraged by tax deductibility, while Bat Conservation Internationalis on hand to help.

While bats pollute the external environment, possums invade home territory, noisily partying in warm, dry roofs at night and enjoying the limitless food supply from gardens and garbage bins.

As they chomp their way through the rose bushes of suburban gardens and plunder the orchards and market gardens of those just trying to make a living, the possum PR machine comes to their aid. Beguiled by pictures of wide-eyed and photogenically cute little possums and joeys clinging to their mothers like furry backpacks, well-meaning if naïve hearts are melted and purses opened. The “donate” icon features widely on environmental and animal protection sites.

The protection lobbies and the compassion industry go into overdrive at the suggestion of any means of getting rid of them — except for that magic word “relocating” — which, of course, only relocates the problem.

Meanwhile, in the stiflingly humid heat of northern Australia, those wanting to cool off dare not go swimming any more: there are now many more crocodiles living in Darwin harbour.

“They were here first!” is the conservationists’ rallying cry, and the Commonwealth government has obligingly recently upheld the ban on hunting crocodiles in the Top End.

Julia Patrick is a freelance Sydney writer on social issues. 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am