June 7th 2014

  Buy Issue 2925

Articles from this issue:

ECONOMIC AGENDA: Cut the deficit while boosting infrastructure

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Tony Abbott faces winter of discontent

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Greens' bid to legalise same-sex 'marriage' by stealth

SOCIETY: Why all the fuss over same-sex marriage?

EDITORIAL: Ukraine election opens door to reconciliation

UNITED STATES: The secret history of Washington-Wall Street collusion

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: 400 million child brides: a global scandal

LIFE ISSUES: 'Bring it on': euthanasia doctor dares police to prosecute him

NEW ZEALAND: Families benefit from NZ budget surplus

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Extraordinary background to new Indian PM

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Indonesia's two presidential candidates in tight battle


CINEMA: A fantastical world suffused with melancholy

BOOK REVIEW The man who would be PM

BOOK REVIEW Uplifting perspective on ageing

BOOK REVIEW: A tale of espionage with a hidden sting

Books promotion page


News Weekly, June 7, 2014

Parental care vs. daycare


Both sides of politics are badly mistaken in believing that mothers with young children should be in the paid workforce, while their children are raised by paid strangers in institutionalised child-care.

Late last year, the Treasurer, Joe Hockey, asked the Productivity Commission (PC) to collect evidence here and overseas to show how institutionalised child-care, rather than home-care, would be of greater benefit to both the economy and to children’s development.

The PC has already received over 1,000 submissions and comments, and will give its final report in October.

One of the best submissions was from a Sydney-based group of about 25 mothers, ranging in age to the mid-40s, and all having tertiary degrees and having a combined total of about 75 children. Their submission showed how short-sighted and narrow it is to judge productivity solely in material terms.

The essential task in generating and forming future workers and taxpayers, whom we so badly need in times of below-replacement levels of fertility, and with the increasing number of unsocialised children, can only be solved by enabling stay-at-home mothers to have larger and better-formed families.

These mothers create far more human capital than the immediate smaller material gains foregone.

A healthy society should give a generous homemaker’s allowance to these unwaged stay-at-home mothers with children, rather than subsidise the childcare industry which is already showing diminishing returns from its increasing costs.

Unpaid work in Australia has been estimated to be worth around 40 per cent of GDP. We applaud childcare workers, nannies, and carers of those in genuine need, but to label unwaged stay-at-home mothers as “unemployed” is a derogatory insult by those ideologues of the left and the right who think that productivity should come at the expense of the family.

Brendan Keogh,
Eaglehawk, Vic.


More power to the states


When I joined the Prime Minister’s Department under Robert Menzies in 1964, we were told that under the Liberals the states would disappear in 20 years and under Labor in 10.

Gough Whitlam sought to do this with a vengeance when he offered to buy the Westmead Hospital from New South Wales, and intended to follow this with the purchase of other government-owned hospitals in other states.

John Howard, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard were going along the same track, so Tony Abbott’s offer to give all health and education back to the states is eminently sensible.

The Abbott government should be congratulated for seeking to make the states more fiscally responsible.

Under the Australian constitution, health and education are state responsibilities. Their return to the states is nothing but an exercise in the principle of subsidiarity.

All that needs to be done is to determine a way for the states to fund their activities. There are at least three ways to achieve this:

1) The states could agree to increase the goods and services tax (GST).

2) The GST could be levied by the states, as is done in the United States. (In this case each state could devise its own spread and level of taxation).

3) As recommended in the report of the Commission of Audit, the states could levy their own income tax and let it continue to be collected by the Australian Tax Office.

John R. Barich,
Claremont, WA

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal Pell's appeal, June 5-6, 2019: An account from the live streaming

NATIONAL AFFAIRS A Q&A to clarify issues in Cardinal Pell's appeal

EDITORIAL Religious freedom: the political and legislative challenges

COVER STORY Transgender birth certificates: No sex, please, we're Victorian

COVER STORY John Setka, for all his faults, is the perfect scapegoat

COVER STORY Anthony Albanese: NSW left factional warlord takes charge

SPECIAL FEATURE Author Rod Dreher brings St Benedict to bear on our decline and fall

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm