May 24th 2014

  Buy Issue 2924

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Single-income families bear the brunt of Budget pain

ECONOMIC AGENDA: Cut the deficit but create a long-term investment bank

EDITORIAL: Senate reform proposals undemocratic

SCHOOLS: Needed: a better model for funding schools

SOCIETY: The lifelong and unbreakable matrix of family

CHILDHOOD: Daycare vs homecare: the experts' verdict

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Can banks create money out of thin air?

NEW ZEALAND: Land of the Long White Cloud sees growth surge

UNITED STATES: The high-tech lynching of Brendan Eich by 'gay' militants

UKRAINE: West draws up plan to stop Putin's energy blackmail

OPINION: Giving aid and comfort to the enemy


CINEMA: The Lego Movie: A totally awesome movie for grown-ups too

BOOK REVIEW The mask of treachery

BOOK REVIEW In-depth picture of Australian army life

Books promotion page

Cut the deficit but create a long-term investment bank

by Patrick J. Byrne

News Weekly, May 24, 2014

Federal governments are different from businesses, because in many important ways they can have their cake and eat it too. They can cut budget expenditure and government debt, while at the same time making major investments in the economy through a long-term investment bank.

And they can do both while keeping their AAA-rating for borrowing on capital markets.

Deputy PM Warren Truss,

Minister for Infrastructure. 

Federal and/or state governments can fund the capital side of any stimulus package through a long-term investment bank, thereby reducing the need for deficit budgets to fund large fiscal stimulus packages.

The concept of a long-term investment bank is important in light of the Coalition’s first federal budget, which is slashing government expenditure in order to bring down the budget deficit and to repay debt. In the process, many families are going to pay a heavy price in cuts to family payments.

While cutting government waste is important, the consequences of Treasurer Joe Hockey’s austerity budget will be higher unemployment, lost tax revenue and greater demands on the welfare budget from those who lack jobs.

At the same time, Mr Hockey says that the government will boost infrastructure spending, which is to be paid for in part by selling off a range of government assets.

Asset sales will include Medibank Private, while scoping studies will examine the possible privatisation of Australian Hearing, Defence Housing Australia, the Royal Australian Mint and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission’s major public register function that provides information about Australia’s 1.9 million companies, business names, financial services licensees and other professionals registered with ASIC.

The proceeds from future privatisations, along with some existing re-allocations of other government funds, will be reinvested in the Commonwealth’s Asset Recycling Fund.

But how much will the government’s planned infrastructure investment contribute to generating new jobs?

The Budget sees a total headline infrastructure investment figure of $50 billion. However, according to analysts at the National Australia Bank, this represents only an additional $9 billion allocated to infrastructure above existing commitments.[1]

This will hardly compensate for the loss of jobs from government cuts.

Yet, two things are clear.

First, Australia needs far greater infrastructure investment than the government is committing itself to. According to Mr Hockey’s Budget, most of the planned investment will be on highway upgrades between the capital cities, transport links in the capital cities, and a tiny bit for some rail upgrades.

Engineers Australia has identified a range of infrastructure that needs major investment, including roads, rail, port, airports, drinkable water, wastewater and storm water, irrigation, electricity, gas and telecommunications.[2]

Second, if the government plans to reduce debt, there will be little scope in foreseeable budgets for expanding infrastructure investment.

Therefore, an alternative way of funding major infrastructure investment is urgently needed.

The Commonwealth government needs a long-term investment bank to finance major capital investment projects and to boost Australia’s productivity and employment.

It could be funded through the Reserve Bank of Australia in exactly the same way as the Bank of England describes its funding of British banks, as outlined by Colin Teese (see his article in this edition of News Weekly).

Those who say that “governments can’t run banks” should be reminded that nobody disputes the reputation of the Reserve Bank of Australia as a government-owned bank, or of the old Commonwealth Bank when it too was government-owned.

Further, the global financial crisis (GFC) was largely the result of major failures in the commercial financial sector, which resulted in the largest bank bail-outs in history. The U.S. government bailed out its banks to the tune of US$700 billion, with another US$187 billion for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Many other nations have set up successful, broad-based government-backed investment banks, such as Germany’s famous Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW), established in 1948 as part of the post-World War II Marshall Plan to rebuild the Federal Republic of Germany. By 2012, the KfW had a balance sheet of €494.8 billion.[3]

Banks like this typically channel investment into major infrastructure projects and into domestic hard industries with long-term growth prospects that commercial banks would not necessarily fund.

Such banks help governments to separate government capital expenditure from recurrent expenditure, while filling a major gap in the financial markets. In turn, this allows a government to avoid debt and budget deficits, and to maintain a high credit-rating, thus enhancing the government’s borrowing capacity.

Overseas experience shows that such a bank could provide a valuable safety net should either Australia’s commercial banks suffer a dry-up of foreign capital, a foreign capital strike or some further external shocks on the fragile global financial markets.

Joe Hockey could save the government, and the electorate, a lot of angst by offsetting his budget cuts with the establishment of a government-backed long-term investment bank.

Patrick J. Byrne is national vice-president of the National Civic Council.


[1] “Industry perspective: Federal Budget and infrastructure”, Business Research and Insights (National Australia Bank), May 14, 2014.

[2] Ken Aldred, “Building infrastructure for Australia’s future prosperity”, News Weekly, August 31, 2013.

[3] “Facts and figures”, KfW Group, 2013.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am