November 23rd 2013


  Buy Issue 2913
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Foreign takeover bid for Australia's GrainCorp..
ADM'S murky history

EDITORIAL: Foreign investment or foreign takeovers?

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Abbott government still cool towards the media

LIFE ISSUES: Dr Nitschke promises death facility for Adelaide

HISTORY: Horatio Nelson, Arthur Phillip and the birth of Australia

UNITED STATES: Obama testing the limits of American culture

LIFE ISSUES: The abominable industry of human trafficking

SOCIETY: How radical feminists have betrayed women

OPINION: Let the people decide on gay 'marriage'

TAIWAN: Taiwan high-tech giant sees clean future

SCHOOLS: Cultural left rules education

CULTURE: The Quixotic pursuit of truth, beauty and goodness

BOOK REVIEW: Stabbing us in the back

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

EDITORIAL:
Foreign investment or foreign takeovers?


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, November 23, 2013

The $3.4 billion takeover bid for Australia’s largest grain-handler, GrainCorp, by American agribusiness giant Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) has brought into stark focus the issue of foreign ownership of Australian businesses.

The federal Treasurer, Joe Hockey, will decide by mid-December whether to allow the takeover to take place, caught as he is between growing concerns about the implications for Australian agriculture of this takeover (see pages 5–7), and free-market advocates’ views that there should be no restrictions on foreign ownership of Australian companies.

The controversy over foreign ownership has descended into name-calling, with one media commentator describing opposition to the takeover as the hysterical rants of agrarian socialists, and the CEO of GrainCorp describing misgivings about the takeover of the Australian grain-handling giant as “pure fantasy”.

The fact is that every developed country has laws which restrict foreign ownership of key assets: the only question is where to draw the line.

The United States, for example, is widely regarded as a country which imposes few restrictions on foreign investment, and is a country with which Australia has a free trade agreement.

However, a 2013 report, prepared by the US Congressional Research Service, listed blanket restrictions on investment in particular industries, including the maritime industry, the aircraft industry, banking, resources and power, and businesses which are parties to government contracts (Source: Foreign Investment in the United States: Major Federal Statutory Restrictions, July 2013).

Investment in other parts of the U.S. economy, such as the media, are subject to national interest tests.

Looked at in this light, the restrictions on foreign ownership in Australia are relatively few.

According to the Treasury’s official statement, Foreign Investment Policy, Australia welcomes foreign investment because it “has helped build Australia’s economy and will continue to enhance the well-being of Australians by supporting economic growth and prosperity”.

However, Australia has restrictions on foreign ownership in selected sectors, including the major banks (the “four pillars” policy), Qantas (49 per cent), Telstra (35 per cent), and major international airports (49 per cent).

Foreign government investors must notify the government and get prior approval before making any direct investment in Australia, regardless of the value of the investment.

Takeovers of Australian companies valued at $248 million or more — such as GrainCorp — are subject to government approval, except for takeover bids originating from New Zealand and American companies, for which the limit is $1,078 million.

Where approvals are discretionary, the government applies a broad national interest test.

This test has been applied to the Chinese telecommunications company, Huawei, which wanted to participate in the National Broadband Network rollout. The former Labor government, on the advice of Australia’s security agencies, declined to give its approval.

One aspect of the national interest test is whether an investment will affect Australia’s ability to protect its strategic and security interests, which includes food security.

Another is the effect on competition. Since the deregulation of the Australian wheat market, a number of potential buyers of Australian farmers’ wheat have emerged. However, having acquired Vicgrain (Victoria) in 2000, Grainco (Queensland) in 2003 and Hunter Grain in 2007, GrainCorp is the largest single player in the market, and is the owner of port and grain-handling facilities around the country.

Its acquisition by an American agribusiness would mean that decisions on pricing and access to its grain-handling facilities would be made overseas. The grains group of the Victorian Farmers Federation has spent months seeking written assurances from ADM as to how it proposes to operate GrainCorp, as it has potential to significantly impact its rivals’ access to port and handling facilities.

The VFF said it is particularly concerned that ADM attempted to introduce a “closed-loop” system in Australia which is a feature of American grain-exporting, where exporters predominantly buy into their own bulk-handling system and export from them, excluding other exporters. So far, the VFF has received no satisfactory response.

Other issues that the federal government will take into account include the impact on future tax revenues, its impact on the economy, the level of future Australian participation in the business, and the interests of employees.

A final consideration is the character of the investor, as in the government’s following stipulation: “The Government considers the extent to which the investor operates on a transparent commercial basis and is subject to adequate and transparent regulation and supervision.”

As a whole, Australia’s foreign investment rules are far less restrictive than most other countries, and, like other countries, Australia imposes a national interest test on foreign takeovers.

The GrainCorp takeover bid will show how serious the government is in protecting the national interest.

Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm