November 9th 2013


  Buy Issue 2912
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Afghanistan after the Western withdrawal

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Bill Shorten and his carbon tax dilemma

ENVIRONMENT: NSW wildfires: State premier is ultimately responsible

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: China pivots towards Central Asia

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: No military solution in sight to end Syrian civil war

EDUCATION: Rediscovering the classical and Christian educational ideal

SOCIETY: Teenage sex: an issue for family or school?

SOCIETY: Radical homosexual activism's latest crusades

LIFE ISSUES: Tasmanian euthanasia bill defeated... for now

CLIMATE SCIENCE: How IPCC climate models exaggerate global warming

UNITED STATES: Name of Jesus banned from city cemetery

AUSTRALIAN HISTORY: The 'inconvenient truths' unearthed by David Bird

VIETNAM WAR: Historical myths about General Vo Nguyen Giap

LETTERS

CULTURE: I tell you naught for your comfort

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

SOCIETY:
Teenage sex: an issue for family or school?


by Gary L. Welton

News Weekly, November 9, 2013

Engaging in open conversations with your teenage child about early sexual activity and teen pregnancy is important. How important? Dr Gary Welton, an American professor of psychology, analyses data from a recent study and notes that parental involvement is a critical component of sex education.

Dr Gary Welton

According to American research published by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, teens in the U.S. may have more wisdom than we give them credit for when it comes to sex education.

Most teens (94 per cent) think that adults should inform them that they ought to wait to have sex at least until they get out of high school. Most teens (88 per cent) say it would be easier to avoid early sexual activity and teen pregnancy if they were able to have more open, honest conversations about these topics with their parents.

Open, honest conversations about early sexual activity and teen pregnancy. How are we doing?

I fear that we, as parents, have too often allowed schools and private programs to assume the role of sex education. This is nothing new. When society argued the wisdom of teaching sex education in our schools, two sides appeared. On one side stood the argument that sex education should be taught in the home, but the other side responded that it simply wasn’t being done.

Yet I wonder, can we expect abstinence programs taught by schools or private organisations to have much impact on our teens if we as parents don’t get behind the effort? If we are comfortable allowing schools to teach the program, should we not at least involve ourselves by discussing the issues with our teens as the sex education unit is being taught? Would you not expect such programs to make more of an impact if parents used the opportunity to engender discussion with their teens?

Research data suggests that if abstinence programs are going to have maximum impact, families must get involved. Working with middle-school students, a Pennsylvania agency conducted an eight-session abstinence program in certain public schools. More than 250 students participated in the educational unit and responded to questions measuring their values and knowledge about sexual relationships. These measures were conducted before the classes began, and were repeated throughout the process.

Because the questions were asked before the program began, it is possible to analyse the children’s changes in sexual values and knowledge. By removing the pre-test scores, we can statistically control for pre-existing differences in knowledge and values. Students from traditional family backgrounds are likely to give different answers than students from a more liberal background. All such differences can be removed from the analysis by statistically controlling for the pre-test scores. The resulting research question can be addressed: To what extent do students change their sexual values and knowledge through an eight-session abstinence education program?

During the program, 20 per cent of the students missed one or more sessions. It could be expected that class attendance would be predictive of change. Those who attended more sessions should have gained more knowledge and been more likely to change their values. Also, some students might choose to skip sessions just because they are not buying into the program. One would think that class attendance would predict changes in knowledge and values.

Another question asked the students whether or not they discussed the class content of each session with a parent. About 33 per cent of the students said they had talked with their parent about every class; another 33 per cent said they had never talked with a parent about the classes; the remaining indicated that they had talked with a parent about some, but not all, of the classes.

The results showed that the number of classes that a student attended was not predictive of a change in sexual values and knowledge. On the other hand, the number of sessions about which they talked with their parents was predictive of change. Those who talked with their parents about the sessions showed more change in their sexual values and knowledge, giving responses more consistent with an abstinence approach.

If class attendance had been a significant predictor, those questioning the impact of the program might argue that the students just learned how to give the expected answers. However, this is not what the data showed. Instead, the data showed that parental discussion was the critical component associated with change.

We have now allowed schools and private organisations to take over sex education. This data suggests, however, that parental involvement remains an important part of the mix.

Parents, we must establish positive communication patterns with our teens. We must discuss sexual realities with them. We must get involved in their sexual education programming. Our teens both need and desire our input on the topic of sexuality. Teenage sex needs to be a family affair.

Dr Gary L. Welton is assistant dean for institutional assessment, professor of psychology at Grove City College (Grove City, Pennsylvania), and a contributor to The Center for Vision & Values, a conservative think-tank. He is a recipient of a major research grant from the Templeton Foundation to investigate positive youth development. 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm