November 9th 2013

  Buy Issue 2912

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Afghanistan after the Western withdrawal

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Bill Shorten and his carbon tax dilemma

ENVIRONMENT: NSW wildfires: State premier is ultimately responsible

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: China pivots towards Central Asia

INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: No military solution in sight to end Syrian civil war

EDUCATION: Rediscovering the classical and Christian educational ideal

SOCIETY: Teenage sex: an issue for family or school?

SOCIETY: Radical homosexual activism's latest crusades

LIFE ISSUES: Tasmanian euthanasia bill defeated... for now

CLIMATE SCIENCE: How IPCC climate models exaggerate global warming

UNITED STATES: Name of Jesus banned from city cemetery

AUSTRALIAN HISTORY: The 'inconvenient truths' unearthed by David Bird

VIETNAM WAR: Historical myths about General Vo Nguyen Giap


CULTURE: I tell you naught for your comfort

Books promotion page

NSW wildfires: State premier is ultimately responsible

by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, November 9, 2013

The deputy leader of the Greens, Adam Bandt, was quick to blame the tragic bushfires in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney on Tony Abbott, because of the Abbott government’s decision — yet to be implemented — to repeal the carbon tax.

Bandt tweeted to his followers a photo of the bushfires, with the note, “Tony Abbott’s plan means more bushfires for Australia & more pics like this of Sydney.”

Undoubtedly, the dry winter and scorching winds from the hot centre of the continent exacerbated the spread of the fires. Moreover, the increasing number of people who have built their homes in recent years in bushland on Sydney’s western fringe has endangered human life.

Fire-fighters described conditions on the worst fire day, October 17, in terms similar to those in Victoria in February 2009, when bushfires ravaged communities east and north-east of Melbourne.

But the underlying cause in the NSW bushfires — as in the bushfires in Victoria and other states — is the lack of fuel-reduction burning, and this has been amply documented in official government statistics.

Every year, there are extreme variations in rainfall and temperature across the country, and bushfire management plans need to be based on the variations in weather conditions, by adopting a long-term strategy of fuel-reduction burns, to achieve a realistic average level.

Studies by fire management experts have shown that, ideally, the combustible trash which litters the floors of Australia’s bushland, and which turns the inevitable bushfires into life-threatening wildfires, should be burned at least every 10 years.

This has been documented in evidence before a number of inquiries conducted by fire management experts from state governments and the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre, including the royal commission following the 2009 Victorian bushfires in which 170 lives were lost.

Roger Underwood, an experienced forester in Western Australia, wrote that after the terrible 1961 fires, “The bulk of the south-west forest [of WA] was burned by controlled, low intensity fire every 6-9 years or so, producing a mosaic of fuel-reduced areas.” These prevented wildfires for a period of 30 years, after which the lessons of the past were forgotten, and WA has since faced increasingly damaging bushfires.

Where controlled burning of the bush is done regularly, the low to medium intensity fires will not only burn leaves, twigs and fallen branches that build up on the forest floor, but leave the dominant species of eucalypts intact. Native animal species, which are adapted to regular fires, also survive them.

But the amount of fuel-reduction burn-offs in New South Wales is pitifully small.

According to the 2011-2 annual report of the NSW Rural Fire Service, which documented the amount of fuel-reduction burns in the state over the previous four years, the area subject to controlled burns over that year was 138,211 hectares — barely above the five-year average.

But, according to the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, which administers the state’s forests and national parks, it has over 7 million hectares under management.

The amount of land subject to fuel-reduction burns is thus less than 2 per cent of the land under management, when at least 10 per cent each year is required for effective fire management.

The level of fuel-reduction burning in New South Wales suggests a rotation rate of once every 50 years — almost worthless from a fire abatement perspective.

The actual situation is even worse than these figures show. The Rural Fire Service also manages fires on private land, so the actual amount of fuel-reduction in state forests and national parks is even lower than the figure above.

The Rural Fire Service’s annual report also shows that, over the next four years, the level of planned fuel-reduction burns is expected to rise to a five-year average of 180,000 hectares — still less than 3 per cent of the land under management.

Although the Minister for Emergency Services, Mike Gallacher, has taken a high profile in relation to the fires, the National Parks and Wildlife Service actually comes under the direct responsibility of the NSW Premier, Barry O’Farrell.

(The National Parks and Wildlife Service is part of the Office of Environment and Heritage, within the NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet).

After the 2011 election, the incoming Premier reorganised the former Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, and took the national parks into his own department.

One of the reasons for the change was dissatisfaction with the influence of extreme environmentalists on forest management under the former Labor government. However, the figures show that little has changed.

No doubt there will be a full inquiry into the terrible bushfires which have threatened entire communities in the Blue Mountains; but, until governments introduce effective fuel-reduction targets, tragedies such as those seen recently in New South Wales will be repeated across the country.

Listen to
News Weekly Podcasts

All you need to know about
the wider impact of transgenderism on society.
TRANSGENDER: one shade of grey, 353pp, $39.99

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

ROYAL COMMISSION Hatchet job on Cardinal Pell breached basic principle of fairness

COVER STORY Gearing up to ditch free-trade policy

CANBERRA OBSERVED Regret over our rushed marriage to China

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Crucial to get Virgin Australia flying again

CANBERRA OBSERVED What's China's beef with our barley?

EDITORIAL Rebuilding industry won't just happen: here's what's needed

EDITORIAL Post-covid19, create a national development bank

© Copyright 2017
Last Modified:
April 4, 2018, 6:45 pm