October 26th 2013

  Buy Issue 2911

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Global instability and debt undermining democracy

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Why GrainCorp should remain in Australian hands

EDITORIAL: Indonesia new cornerstone of Australia's foreign policy

MARRIAGE LAW: Ploy to make Coalition legalise same-sex marriage

VICTORIA: Melbourne GP may be struck off after refusing abortion referral

VICTORIA: Screaming radicals, feminists attack pro-life marchers

ENVIRONMENT: Threat to free speech from eco-activist secondary boycotts

ENVIRONMENT: IPCC report: triumph of spin over substance

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Will exports or our home market be our salvation?

POPULATION: High-rise apartment living produces smaller families

POPULATION: We already grow enough food to feed 10 billion people

HISTORY: Theodore Roosevelt: a study in resilience

HISTORY: Australia's journey: From prison to democracy in 40 years

CULTURE: Whoever pays the piper calls the tune

BOOK REVIEW The economics of self-sufficient households

Books promotion page

Whoever pays the piper calls the tune

by Symeon J. Thompson

News Weekly, October 26, 2013

Actor: “What’s my motivation?” Director: “Getting paid.” — an old gag.

There are a great many strange ideas about what it means to be an artist. They would be really funny — okay, so they are quite funny — except that when they’re taken seriously they do real damage to anyone of an artistic bent, and go on to have a disturbing effect on the whole of society.

To be human is to be a maker. To consider the act of making, i.e., art, as an optional extra is to consider the human being as little more than an animal, or a machine made of meat. The end result is the radical dehumanisation that we see around us every day and the triumph of those forces that consider every life as expendable.

The culture war is not about left vs right or revolutionary vs reactionary. The culture war is more fundamental than that. It is the duel of the human against the inhuman.

In keeping with this I’d like to suggest another catchphrase: “Artists are people too.” They may wear funny clothes, spend long periods of time staring into space, say odd things, and have an incredible capacity to debate the relative merits of celluloid and digital, or method and technique acting; but this just means they’re doing their job.

Job? Huh? Splashing paint on a canvas isn’t a job. Playing make-believe isn’t a job. Jobs are nine-to-five things where one is paid to do boring stuff — or, in the case of the office that publishes News Weekly, nine-to-nine the following day to hold back the apocalypse. They certainly don’t involve dancing with beautiful women or handsome men. Or, at least, that’s a common complaint about artistic sorts.

While the arts may look more like play than work, that simply shows a lack of imagination, or perhaps envy. Art-work is hard work. It is also specialist work that definitely does not suit most people. Ernest Hemingway remarked that he write the end of Farewell to Arms 27 times to “get the words right”.

I rather suspect that those reading this column need not to be told this. Anyone who’s learnt a musical instrument knows how gruelling it can be. The effortlessness of the pro comes after an enormous amount of practice. It requires a huge investment of one’s self to pursue a career as a creative artist. And that is an investment that deserves to be repaid.

One of the funniest ideas about artists is that they don’t actually need to be paid. Apparently, human beings can live on the warm glow that comes from a job well done — and even support a family! Maybe we should tap into this feeling of satisfaction — it could be the solution to the energy crisis.

You may think I’m being too harsh and that no-one would seriously believe that; but if that’s so, why does the main income for artists come from government grants — aka handouts? Why do talented hard-working actors spend an awful lot of time working for nothing? Why can very few artists, of any field, actually make a living from their art?

This is most definitely a recent phenomenon. I’m pretty sure that Michelangelo didn’t work at a corner store while painting the Sistine chapel, or that Shakespeare paid the bills by moonlighting as a barman. Errol Flynn was not a tour guide when he made The Adventures of Robin Hood, and I’m willing to bet that Joan Sutherland wasn’t working as a receptionist while performing at the Opera House.

Pray forgive my sarcasm, but something’s really rotten in the state of the arts. Traditionally, if an artist was any good, they’d be able to make enough of a living from their art to support themselves and their families. They weren’t going to become mega-wealthy, but they would be able to survive, without relying on government handouts.

This situation is not terrible solely for those poor fools who are artists. It’s terrible for the rest of society as well. It can’t be good for culture if the folk that make the culture are unable to have a family, or if family is seen as an obstacle to creative success. What sort of culture would such people make? Oh wait, we can see that played out on a grand scale around us.

To fight for the human, we need to provide those who can fight it with the means to do so. I’m working on possible solutions, and I look forward to your company as I do so.

Cowboys or knights? We’ll need the right clothes while we stare into space working on this.


Symeon J. Thompson is a member of the Film Critics Circle of Australia (FCCA). 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am