September 14th 2013


  Buy Issue 2908
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Major challenges face an Abbott government

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Five lessons that Labor must learn

MARRIAGE DEBATE: Media's reaction to 'child equality' election campaign

SOCIETY: Same-sex marriage and social change:
Exceeding the speed of thought

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: The folly of a US-led Syria strike

ENERGY: Affordable, clean way to achieve fuel self-sufficiency

SCHOOLS: Educrats trying to change their spots

CHINA: Long jail term looms for 'crown prince' Bo Xilai

UNITED STATES: White House and media ignore upsurge in racial violence

LIFE ISSUES: Does an unborn child feel pain during an abortion?

LIFE ISSUES: Dr Nitschke reveals euthanasia's dark side

HISTORY: Must we be slaves of time and place?

LETTERS

CULTURE: The forgotten art of dressing well

BOOK REVIEW Tim Fischer's time in Rome

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CULTURE:
The forgotten art of dressing well


by Symeon J. Thompson

News Weekly, September 14, 2013

“Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society.”
– Mark Twain.

There is a tendency among serious people to consider clothing unimportant, and those who have an interest in it to be shallow and unthinking. It doesn’t matter what’s worn, as much as what the wearer stands for.

This is true to a point, and the point is that what we wear, and how we wear it, shows to the world exactly what we stand for. More than that, what we wear affects how we feel and think about ourselves and our place in society.

This point can be read in umpteen style guides, from the air-brushed air-headedness of the girls’ glossy mag, to the seriously thought-provoking www.artofmanliness.com.

It’s also raised in debates over modesty, the “pornification” of culture, and the place of religious expression in society — “Ban the Burka”, etc.

But where it is not raised is arguably where it should be most raised — within political movements that favour family, tradition, life and humanity. It’s pushed aside as a purely “personal” matter in favour of weightier topics such as economics, elections and education.

It is certainly true that the weightier topics matter the most, and that how one dresses is, now, a purely personal matter. Moreover, resources for those who fight the Good Fight are scarce enough, so they oughtn’t be wasted on frivolity.

However, the reason that the Other Side is more or less running the show is that they targeted the simple, shallow things that could be easily changed, thus preparing the ground to go after the things that really matter. The revolutionaries have always pushed for loosening standards of dress, because once that armour goes, the things it protects becomes easier to attack.

Consider the fashion industry. It didn’t really exist till the mid-20th century. Clothes were made by craftsmen and women sourced from local, natural materials. They were practical and rooted in history and tradition and religion. They were something of which one could be proud, and they encouraged a thriving and creative economy. Each item would be utterly unique, but also signified a culture and a region and a people.

John Steed (Patrick Macnee) and

Mrs Emma Peel (Diana Rigg) in the
British 1960s series, The Avengers.

Now we have a fashion industry where mass-produced clothes of middling quality and utter uniformity are pushed onto the masses. Instead of localised, sustainable human economy, we have a global consumerist one, and all that this entails.

I recently attended the Mercedes-Benz Fashion Festival in Sydney. Some of the clothes were quite good, but the atmosphere was one of icy inhumanity. To be a catwalk model seems to mean annihilating one’s humanity in favour of being a walking coat-hanger. It’s doubtful if anyone involved was aware of their part in a tragedy — designers and models, like almost all artists, focus on what they do and ignore everything else.

A contrast was to be found in the Fifties Fair I attended a few days later. Suits, ties and floral dresses combined with swing dancing and vintage bric-à-brac. My companion commented how the attempt to dress better led to excellent manners and cheerful, family-friendly vibes. No one was perfectly fifties, but the very act of thinking about what was worn led to similar thinking about how to behave.

It is this insight that inspires an eclectic bunch variously known as the Young Fogeys, anarcho-dandyists, or Chaps — after their flagship periodical, The Chap. The idea is that our world is impersonal, bureaucratic and anti-human. Rather than seeking to change public policy, the Chaps strive to dress well and have excellent manners. True to their British origin, there’s a strong element of dry humour, but it’s not just affectation.

The Chaps have held a series of protests under the banner of “Civilise the Streets”, where they’ve protested against modern “art” and against attempts to set up global chain-stores on Savile Row. They may look like extras from Brideshead Revisited; but that novel is quite serious in arguing that Beauty, Truth and Goodness are one, regardless of our attempts to sever them.

I am not arguing that a political movement that seeks to make the world fit for humanity needs be run by dandies and dames, or that the next time one visits the publishers of News Weekly, the men will be in three-piece suits and the women will look as if they’ve stepped off a 1930s film-set — to be honest the women do look rather smashing already… but that “dressing up” has a real impact, that it encourages humour and confidence and grace, and that such qualities help convince a world deadened by depravity that goodness is actually rather appealing.

On that note, where did I put my sword-stick? No one ever said anything about anachronistic attire needing to be impractical, did they?

Amor vincit omnia. Cheers!

Symeon J. Thompson is a member of the Film Critics Circle of Australia (FCCA). 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm