August 31st 2013

  Buy Issue 2907

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Building infrastructure for Australia's future prosperity

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Funding the expansion of Australia's infrastructure

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Rudd's campaign strategy 'full of sound and fury...'

QUEENSLAND: How Labor's Queensland strategy has backfired

FEDERAL ELECTION 2013: Same-sex marriage now a priority for Rudd

EDITORIAL: Federal election: Australia's stark choice

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: 'Same-sex marriage' would require change to Constitution

SOCIETY: Five flawed ideas inflicting untold damage on Australia

SCHOOLS: The sly assault on faith-based schools

ENVIRONMENT: Germany's coal-fired energy revolution

CHINA: China builds 'ghost cities' to transform the nation

POLITICAL IDEAS: On revolutions and competing worldviews

OBITUARY: Compassionate defender of life: Kathleen Harrigan (1921-2013)


CULTURE: Introducing the gentleman-adventurer

BOOK REVIEW Polemical fireworks from India's C.S. Lewis

Books promotion page

survey link


Federal election: Australia's stark choice

News Weekly, August 31, 2013

Despite the rapid decline in the Rudd Labor government’s standing during the early days of the 2013 election campaign, there is widespread agreement that neither side is addressing the larger challenges facing Australia in the years ahead.

On the government side, Mr Rudd promised, at the outset, that his election campaign would end the negativity in Australian politics and put forward a positive vision for the country.

He immediately proceeded to launch a fear campaign targeted specifically against Tony Abbott, ranging from the weird — that Mr Abbott would be facing sexual harassment charges if he were an employer, for remarks he made about a Liberal female candidate in Sydney, to the unbelievable — that Abbott would slash thousands of jobs if elected and push the Australian economy into recession.

This was followed by “attack ads” in which a woman acting as a mother of young children accused Abbott of being “angry”, and a succession of announcements that an Abbott government would increase the goods and services tax (GST), abandon the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), abandon the National Broadband Network (NBN), attack penalty rates for employees, as well as cut family support, health care and industry assistance.

This was followed by repeated attacks on Liberal economic spokesmen, such as the shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey, that the Liberals lack economic responsibility and credibility.

The fact that the previous Rudd and Gillard Labor governments squandered the surplus of over $20 billion left in the last year of the Howard Coalition government and, despite repeated promises, has not returned the budget to surplus since 2008 shows that Labor is in no position to criticise the opposition.

In fact, if one compares the last Coalition government with Labor, the striking fact is that, in almost every year, the Coalition produced a budget surplus, often softening the size of the surplus by reducing corporate or individual tax rates.

To sell itself, the Rudd campaign is characterised by an almost daily promise of government largesse to try to lock in one or other constituency around the country.

For example, during a visit to Adelaide, the Prime Minister promised $500 million extra for the troubled Holden car manufacturer. In western Sydney, he pledged a hospital upgrade for local residents. In Darwin, he announced a northern development plan based on expansion of the Ord River irrigation scheme, a 20-year strategic growth plan for Darwin and North Queensland regional centres, and concessional tax zones for northern Australia.

When the Opposition last February announced a program of northern development, its plans were ridiculed by one Labor minister as “an absolute disaster”, and by another as “a grab bag of wacky ideas”. Now, the Rudd government has embraced them.

By contrast, the Opposition’s campaign has been based on a “small target” strategy, with a focus on four issues — repeal of the carbon tax, repeal of the mining tax, balance the budget and stop the flow of unlawful boat arrivals from Indonesia.

The only policy issue on which the Opposition leader has come under criticism has been his long-standing commitment to the introduction of a taxpayer-funded paid parental leave scheme, giving mothers six months’ paid leave at their previous salary, up to a level of $150,000 a year.

Yet, even here, Mr Abbott has delayed its introduction until 2015, no doubt to reduce the budgetary impact of the scheme.

Despite a widespread perception that the election campaign is going nowhere, opinion polls have shown a consistent trend. Since the first week of the campaign, Labor’s electoral standing has fallen.

If Tony Abbott is elected to lead the country, he will face major challenges above and beyond dealing with the legacy of a spendthrift government, at a time when the Australian economy is slowing due to a lack of community confidence, slowing growth in China, and the end of the construction phase of the mining boom.

A major task will be to rebuild confidence, not just that of consumers, but of hard-hit Australian manufacturers and farmers who have been abandoned by government policies which have failed to protect Australian industry and agriculture from predatory foreign competition.

Infrastructure to support Australian industry is vital for future development, as News Weekly discusses in Ken Aldred and Patrick J. Byrne’s articles in this issue.

Further, there needs to be a coherent family policy, going beyond the debate over “same-sex marriage” and paid parental leave (which amounts to a subsidy for families with two full-time incomes). We should examine how to nurture and support Australian families, based on policies which encourage couples to marry and have children.

And, further, there needs to be a rethink of Australian foreign policy beyond economic necessities. It should be oriented towards building an alliance with the democracies of Asia — India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Indonesia — and maintaining our long-standing Western alliances, instead of kow-towing to the regime in Beijing.

These are formidable challenges, which could be made more difficult if Labor and the Greens retain control of the Senate.

Peter Westmore is national president of the National Civic Council.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse

News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm