LETTERS News Weekly
, August 17, 2013
Jobs growth outweighs employability
Having worked in the old Commonwealth Employment Service, the story “No work test for 300,000” (Australian Financial Review, July 31) came as no surprise.
One key point missing from these stories is the current job vacancy rate.
It stands at around five-plus unemployed persons for every vacancy, the lowest for many years; or if you use the real unemployment rate, it stands at 15 to 20-plus unemployed for every vacancy, depending on one’s skill level.
If every job available was filled instantly, there would still be more than 700,000 people unemployed, or really 2 million-plus if you used a more accurate definition of unemployment. The ABS survey of the real level of unemployment, “Persons not in the labour force”, refers to this.
So why even bother with policies such as Job Services Australia and their job search/training obligation, which aim to increase the employability of people without jobs?
The vacancy rate shows that the most important thing to do is increase the supply of jobs, not increase the employability of unemployed people.
Since the Australian government began its welfare-to-work blitz, the proportion of unemployed people out of work for over a year has gone up.
More people than ever are starving on the miserly Newstart allowance.
The labour market isn’t getting better. Any signs of so-called improvement are usually due to a drop in the participation rate; and, on the most important measure of all, vacancies, it’s getting much worse, under both the Liberals and Labor.
St Kilda West, Vic.
More coffins than cradles
Today, nearly all developed countries, i.e., 40 per cent of the world’s population in 70 countries, produce more coffins than cradles because of their declining birth rates.
An anti-life contraceptive mentality has taken over the West; for selfish convenience and recreational sex have separated love-making from baby-making.
As predicted, contraception invariably leads to other unnatural behaviours which further lessen birth-rates and even life expectancy.
The loss of respect for life and motherhood leads to abortion, infanticide, sterilisation, infidelity, divorce, homosexuality, same-sex marriage, assisted suicide, euthanasia and even imposed population controls in some countries.
Human life is becoming cheap and disposable, subject to design, utility and a used-by date, as in animal breeding.
The natural laws of healthy human sexual behaviour have been deduced by philosophers, confirmed by common experience and scientific evidence, and lived out by many prosperous societies.
We defy these laws at our peril. No one can claim a “right” to deny the basic prior rights of natural law.
When love-making and baby-making (the unitive and procreative act) are separated, the full self-giving love and openness to new life are missing.
Having “sex” prevails over being in “true love”, and our bodies become only commodities for pleasure.
Anti-life behaviour and sex perversions make a culture of death and are literally wiping out societies, as we see everywhere.
God bless those married couples who enjoy living and loving generously and being open to new life whenever.
We badly need such families today for a prosperous culture of true love and life naturally, from womb to tomb, and we will have no more worries about birth rates.
Fr Bernard McGrath,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
In defence of our humanity
News Weekly, August 17, 2013.
Pacific Rim, an American science-fiction film (rated M), is reviewed by Symeon Thompson.
Pacific Rim is a thriller that pays tribute to the likes of Godzilla and Neon Genesis Evangelion; but does so with a delicacy that belongs entirely to its creator, Guillermo del Toro, the man meant to be at the helm of Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit.
Aliens, called Kaiju (Japanese for “strange creatures” or “monsters”) have been invading the Earth through an inter-dimensional portal in the ocean.
To combat them, humanity bands together to build the Jaegers (German for “hunters”), huge human-operated robots. Despite the initial success of the Jaegers, a tragedy results in the dismantling of the program — and it goes underground, funded by private backers until it can return.
The cinematography consists largely of beautifully-shot battle scenes. The other part is the delicate detail in the imagery, a hallmark of del Toro’s work, where even the most pyrotechnic fight will have shots of the smallest things, ones that challenge the greatest miniaturist painters.
The worst feature is the atrocious Aussie accents. Otherwise, the film is a straightforward battle of good against evil, in its many forms.
The film is a further proof of the argument that people want stories that show that dragons might be beaten, as there are always “dragons” in the mad race of life, that —
* * *
Is it just me, dear reader, or is there a sense of déjà vu in these lines? Pray forgive me if I break “the fourth wall” to address directly all of you who read these writings, but I feel we need to talk.
I write for News Weekly as its film critic, hence the note at the foot of this column about my belonging to the Film Critics Circle of Australia.
The definition of film critic requires that one write on those movies newly released in the cinema. The added catch for members of the FCCA is that we at least see Aussie films, and that we review them preferably.
Since I started writing for News Weekly, I have sought to stick to this brief. It gives one an excellent discipline. My role is to consider films mainly as films, referring to their cinematography and acting and sound design and all those parts that make them up.
I’ve understood this, dear reader, as a brief to consider films that are culturally significant in one way or another, be it through popularity or critical acclaim or whatever, and look hard to see why it really is that they matter.
The problem with this is that it means I tend to write on a particular sort of film, and that that sort is not really one to take everyone in the family to. As I’m sure you’ve noticed, only a few of the movies I’ve reviewed earn less than an M rating.
That’s simply because it’s a better use of ink to write 800 words on a topic that deserves 800 words, than one that might be better served by a postage stamp.
And so, dear reader, a change is a-coming with the scribblings of your correspondent. My esteemed editor had noticed the same problem and suggested reviewing films gone by. I agreed, but was keen that something more could be done.
The “something more” is hush-hush; but I think you can be trusted.
There is much more to the spinning of ripping good yarns than that which we have been given.
It’s time to make a stand against the dross, to make a stand for that which is true and good and beautiful in the world of human making.
I extend an invitation to you all to join me on my hunt for something very special. The movie reviews ain’t going anywhere. Let’s just say that I’m reviewing the most amazing movie of all — our lives as we re-present them in the things we make. Life is not a “nice” movie, but it is a beautiful one.
My sins are many and grievous, dear reader. Those mistakes I’ve made thus far are a source of pain and confusion for those near and dear. I’m sure yours are the same, unless you believe you’ve reached perfection on earth, and then you deserve applause — and a straitjacket.
Instead of despairing at our atrociousness, I think we’d do better to atone by seeking out truly beautiful counter-points, by finding ways to forgive and forget, to regain our humanity, rather than wallowing in our depravity.
The art that uplifts the soul was not made by the perfect, but by the imperfect, striving to show that they’re more than their faults.
I’d like you to come with me as I seek out this art, as I try to find that which helps us to be human; to learn to love as God Himself loves; not denying evil, but not giving in to it; to truly live a life of Amor Vincit Omnia.
Symeon Thompson is a member of the Film Critics Circle of Australia (FCCA).