June 8th 2013

  Buy Issue 2901

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Survey reveals left-wing slant of ABC journalists

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Julia Gillard's worst tactical mistake

EDITORIAL: After the Ford closure: the future of the car industry

NATIONAL REFERENDUM: Hidden dangers in local government referendum

OPINION: Unwaged mums forgotten in baby bonus cut

AGRICULTURE: Animal cruelty in Indonesia: was it a set-up?

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VII: Sydney hosts exhilarating World Congress of Families

MARRIAGE: The traditional family remains the most treasured relationship

EUTHANASIA: NSW parliament rejects euthanasia bill

HUMAN RIGHTS: Sydney Uni under fire over Chinese transplant surgeon

LIFE ISSUES: Abortion: the ultimate child abuse

CULTURE: Navigating contemporary culture: The importance of good reading

UNITED STATES: America's Boy Scouts to accept open homosexuals

SCHOOLS: National curriculum's crusade against Christianity

CINEMA: Lords of war or lords of peace?

BOOK REVIEW History's verdict on Mao

Books promotion page

Unwaged mums forgotten in baby bonus cut

by George Christensen MP

News Weekly, June 8, 2013

In 1942, Robert Menzies struck a nerve in the Australian populace by speaking out for the “forgotten people”.

More than 70 years on, the “forgotten people” still exist and are found in almost one million Australian families where one of the parents makes the choice to “stay at home” and look after the couple’s own children. The recent removal of the baby bonus has certainly seen to this.

While polls suggest the baby bonus was probably well past it use-by date within the electorate at large, Labor’s removal of the scheme is yet another betrayal of Australian families. Two years ago, Families Minister Jenny Macklin was saying that the government was “budgeting for the baby bonus to continue right out into the future”.

“The government won’t be scrapping the baby bonus,” Macklin said at the time. “We understand how important it is to provide financial support to families when a baby comes into the home.”

Given Labor’s track record on broken promises (witness the carbon tax, the private health rebate cut and the supposed budget surplus), it’s a minor miracle the baby bonus scheme lasted so long after that particular promise by Macklin.

The removal of the baby bonus, while perhaps politically popular, leaves a massive void in the nation’s family assistance regime.

For families in which one of the parents chooses to leave paid employment and provide care for their own children themselves rather than outsourcing that care to a childcare centre, there seems to be little in the way of assistance when compared to that on offer to other families.

This is not the first time that Labor has whittled away at programs that parents who choose to care for their children until they are of school age.

When Kevin Rudd was still Prime Minister, Labor stripped more than $3,250 a year in Family Tax Benefit B out of the pockets of more than 40,000 families in which one parent earned $150,000 or more while the spouse remained out of the paid workforce in order to provide care for their children.

The baby bonus has also been hacked at by Labor in budgets past. Last year, Treasurer Wayne Swan cut the baby bonus from $5,000 to $3,000 for children other than the first-born. Back in 2011, as Swan began to face up to his growing national debt crisis, he cut the baby bonus by $400 a year.

This cut was condemned by Liberal National Coalition leader Tony Abbott, who said at the time that he thought the Gillard Labor government “has never had much respect for the stay-at-home mums of Australia”. He’s right. It doesn’t.

Back in her university days, Julia Gillard rose to the lofty heights of president of the Australian Union of Students (AUS). Under her presidency, the AUS came out with a policy position that “prostitution in marriage is the transaction of sex in return for love, security and house-keeping”.

In other words, our Prime Minister presided over a group that believed all housewives were harlots.

Both the Prime Minister and her Families Minister Jenny Macklin are members of the radical feminist faction of the Labor Party known as Emily’s List. Along with the liberalisation of abortion laws, one of the key aims of this organisation is getting mothers out of the vocation of caring for their children themselves and into the paid workforce.

For the radical feminist brigade the choice of “staying at home” to look after children is seen as less worthy than being in the paid workforce. It’s one of the reasons Emily’s List has been such a cheer squad for paid parental leave.

Under paid parental leave, so-called stay-at-home mothers are left on the scrap heap. For a woman who, five years ago, left her paid career to become a full-time mother, caring for her child herself, until he or she was of school age, and who then became pregnant again in the past nine months, paid parental leave delivers nothing.

Government policy now officially values the work of mothers in delivering their own personal child care as less than that of those who are in the paid workforce, and that is not only sexist but a great shame to this nation.

The removal of the baby bonus without a decent scheme to replace it only compounds the inequity. With our nation now cruising towards a debt of more than $370 billion, there appears to be little financial capacity to introduce a sound replacement to the baby bonus in the short term.

However, future governments must consider the needs of these “forgotten people” — unwaged mothers looking after their own children.

George Christensen is federal Liberal National Party (LNP) member for Dawson.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am