June 8th 2013

  Buy Issue 2901

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: Survey reveals left-wing slant of ABC journalists

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Julia Gillard's worst tactical mistake

EDITORIAL: After the Ford closure: the future of the car industry

NATIONAL REFERENDUM: Hidden dangers in local government referendum

OPINION: Unwaged mums forgotten in baby bonus cut

AGRICULTURE: Animal cruelty in Indonesia: was it a set-up?

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VII: Sydney hosts exhilarating World Congress of Families

MARRIAGE: The traditional family remains the most treasured relationship

EUTHANASIA: NSW parliament rejects euthanasia bill

HUMAN RIGHTS: Sydney Uni under fire over Chinese transplant surgeon

LIFE ISSUES: Abortion: the ultimate child abuse

CULTURE: Navigating contemporary culture: The importance of good reading

UNITED STATES: America's Boy Scouts to accept open homosexuals

SCHOOLS: National curriculum's crusade against Christianity

CINEMA: Lords of war or lords of peace?

BOOK REVIEW History's verdict on Mao

Books promotion page

Hidden dangers in local government referendum

by Dr Augusto Zimmermann

News Weekly, June 8, 2013

I do not favour putting to referendum a proposal to amend Australia’s Constitution to recognise local government in this federal document. Such a proposal muddies the relationship between the Commonwealth and the states, which is the central function of our federal Constitution. Furthermore, it opens the door for further centralisation as the Commonwealth would be able to bypass the states and deal with local government directly.

The drafters of our constitution divided power solely between the Commonwealth and the states. Local government is not recognised in the Constitution because the constitutional convention decided to create an authentic federalism. As such, federations are characterised by the union between autonomous states for the formation of a new central government.

To recognise local government in a federal document is akin to creating an entirely novel type of federation formed by the union between the states and ... municipalities!

In a more practical sense, the idea that local government should have a greater role in the Australian federal system seems to hide a centralist agenda, which would allow the federal government to implement, directly through local government, policies that the federal government thought were being impeded by state governments.

Currently, local government is used by the Australian states for exercising aspects of their own administrative functions. Hence, local government is created and maintained by state legislation; the geographic extent of local government districts is determined by state legislation; and the powers of councils are conferred by state legislation.

In this sense, the recognition in the constitution of local government would lead to the further weakening of state legislative powers. It would have the inevitable effect of further empowering the Commonwealth to implement the homogenisation of policies in the states, even if this was contrary to the will of any individual state. Of course, this would reduce all the more the capacity of the states to maintain their own identities, laws, government structures and administration.

For these reasons, Australian voters would be quite justified in suspecting that such a proposal may represent another symptom of “creeping centralism”, vesting more power in the hands of Canberra to the detriment of the states, and potentially to the detriment of local government itself.

Augusto Zimmermann, LLB, LLM, PhD (Monash), teaches legal theory and constitutional law at Murdoch University, Western Australia. He is also president of the Western Australian Legal Theory Association (WALTA) and editor of The Western Australian Jurist. He recently published a widely acclaimed book, Western Legal Theory: Theory, Concepts and Perspectives (Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2013).


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am