May 25th 2013

  Buy Issue 2900

Articles from this issue:

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The federal Budget: Swan's swan song

EDITORIAL: Family policy is more than paid parental leave

HOUSING: Home ownership still out of reach

TELECOMMUNICATIONS: Which broadband policy should Australia adopt?

SCHOOLS: The national curriculum's ideological agenda

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: A debt-free way to lift output and employment

PROFILE: Left-wing veteran of Australia's 'history wars'

NATIONAL INTEREST: Australian appeasers, past and present

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: The Islamic origins of Syria's civil war

WORLD CONGRESS OF FAMILIES VII: Why natural marriage must be protected

LIFE ISSUES: The unheeded cry of post-abortion grief


CINEMA: Choosing darkness or choosing light

BOOK REVIEW How to win the marriage debate

BOOK REVIEW An unusual story of World War II

Books promotion page

Choosing darkness or choosing light

News Weekly, May 25, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness (rated M), a 3D film, is reviewed by Symeon Thompson, a member of the Film Critics Circle of Australia (FCCA).

Star Trek is arguably one of the best examples of the “stories as thought experiments” approach, allowing the investigation of ideas in a thorough, but accessible, way. The late Gene Roddenberry created it to explore the ideals of rationalistic humanism in action, and it has become a cornerstone of modern mythology.

In 2009, it was spectacularly re-booted by J.J. Abrams, who has further fleshed it out in Star Trek Into Darkness.

While on an exploration mission, the crew of the USS Enterprise save a planet on the brink of annihilation. In so doing, they end up violating the “prime directive” — the ban on interfering with the natural development of other civilisations — which leads to the disciplining of Captain James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) and Commander Spock (Zachary Quinto), and the return of control of the Enterprise to Rear-Admiral Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood).

Back on Earth, an intricate plan is set in motion by Starfleet agent John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch), beginning with the bombing of a secret data centre in London, followed by a direct attack on Starfleet headquarters that results in the death of Rear-Admiral Pike and the effective crippling of Starfleet command.

Upon discovering that Harrison has fled to the Klingon homeworld of Kronos, Admiral Marcus (Peter Weller) reinstates Kirk and authorises a mission to terminate Harrison with extreme prejudice — a mission that supposedly “does not exist”, and that seems to have much more behind it.

Cumberbatch is superb as a character villain, his rich voice adding to his well-written complexity. Quinto and Pine bring blokey bromance to a very odd couple — one driven by abstract logic, the other by gut instinct; one unfeeling, and the other, almost but not quite, unthinking.

The 3D cinematography is of the “I just missed getting hit in the head by non-existent shrapnel” sort. It’s all about the action and will certainly satisfy the adrenaline-lovers, but once again is not a necessary part of the experience.

What is necessary, however, is some of the masterfully shot, near-silent set pieces that tell deeply emotional stories without dialogue, and prove that the film-makers aren’t just into explosions. They possess an incredible poignancy and delicacy that is a delight to behold.

Idea-wise, the story tropes are familiar without being fake. And, since this is part of prequel territory, what matters is not so much what happens, as how and why it happens.

There are no spoilers in saying that Kirk and Spock are alive at the end of the film, and that the Enterprise is about to set off on yet another mission. The fact that the events of this film pre-date the original TV series should give that away.

We watch how the heroes grow. — how Kirk becomes a man of honour and integrity, and Spock emotionally sensitive. We watch the set-up of what is to come, while all the while perceiving oblique comments on the human condition.

This is the crux of Star Trek. It is “propaganda”, in the best sense of the word, for scientific humanism. This is the belief in the innate perfectibility of man and environment, tempered by the recognition that there are many obstacles to such “perfection”. It shares with neo-conservatism a love for the “noble lie” as the simplest pretext to remove such obstacles.

One need not be a Starfleet science officer to realise that this whole “noble lie” business is rather risky. Recently, this was superbly explored in the Batman film, The Dark Knight Rises. But it remains one of Star Trek’s favourite themes. It is an entirely logical one, and might seem little more than a philosophical quibble, but it is an idea that can, and does, cause problems in our world.

The success of Star Trek comes from its recognition of the truths inherent in the world and in human nature. Kirk’s hubris might be his undoing, yet his adoption of humility is a clear sign of his heroism. The agendas of certain individuals arise from the noblest of motives, but their unscrupulous pursuit of them transforms them into villains.

Crucially, it is about the choices that are made. These choices might be for good ends; but if the means are evil, then the outcome is poisoned from the start. This is a theme particularly suited to science-fiction-type stories. It can be seen in the Iron Man series, and in Superman and in Batman.

“We make our own demons” was the opening line of Iron Man 3. We make them because we often mistake them for angels.

The moral of Star Trek Into Darkness is given away in the title. If we step into the darkness, then darkness will progressively engulf us and we will mistake it for the light. It is about discerning the difference, taking calculated risks, and not just acting for the right reasons, but rightly.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am