May 11th 2013


  Buy Issue 2899
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

SPECIAL FEATURE: Academics' venom signals climate scare's end

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Both government and opposition facing moment of truth

EDITORIAL: Three constitutional amendment proposals before the PM

NEW ZEALAND: NZ parliament's same-sex 'marriage' vote analysed

UNITED STATES: The Boston Marathon bombing in perspective

MEDIA: Experts blamed 'right-wing terrorists' for Boston bombings

PRIMARY INDUSTRY: Fruit-canning industry laid waste by cheap imports

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Currency, manufacturing and trade policy

CLIMATE CHANGE: Why EU emissions trading scheme faces collapse

OPINION: Defence strategy must not ignore the lessons of history

HUMAN RIGHTS: China's grisly organ theft: their crime, our shame

LIFE ISSUES: Killed for being the wrong gender

CULTURE: Australia's intellectual left under scrutiny

LETTERS

CINEMA: Compelling story of a tormented superhero

BOOK REVIEW The economist who became a Christian

BOOK REVIEW Out of shadows and illusions into reality

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

CLIMATE CHANGE:
Why EU emissions trading scheme faces collapse


by Peter Westmore

News Weekly, May 11, 2013

The collapse of the European Union’s emissions trading scheme (ETS) appears imminent, with the price of EU carbon dioxide (CO2) permits falling from a peak of about €30 ($37) in 2008 to as low as €2.46 ($3) last month, after the European Parliament rejected a proposal to delay the sale of 900 million CO2 permits in the world’s biggest carbon market.

The collapse of the EU scheme has direct implications for the future of Australia’s carbon tax, as the Australian scheme is linked to Europe’s. The Gillard government’s carbon pollution reduction scheme (CPRS) began with a carbon tax and will shift to an emissions trading scheme linked to the EU’s in 2015.

Despite claims that the problems in Europe are the result of the eurozone crisis, this is only a small part of it.

Emissions trading schemes are designed to “put a price on carbon”, that is, to drive up the cost of fossil fuels (particularly coal), to make the more expensive renewable energy more attractive and to provide a new source of revenue for governments.

The problem is that most of the EU’s competitors have not introduced such a scheme, and, as a result, European goods have increased in price, making them less competitive in world markets. Additionally, it has forced up the price of energy for consumers.

Numerous attempts to force all countries to adopt such schemes — through the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Kyoto Protocol and the various Earth Summits — have all failed for a variety of reasons, leaving the Europeans with a costly and ultimately futile experiment in price-fixing.

There is growing disenchantment with the scheme in Europe, particularly in Germany which has traditionally been a driver of such policies.

Dr Philipp Rösler, a South Vietnamese-born

German politician, is federal Minister of

Economics and Technology and Vice-Chancellor

of Germany. He is Chairman of the liberal

Free Democratic Party and the first

Asian-born Cabinet minister in Germany.

Most members of the largest party in the European Parliament, the centre-right European People’s Party, voted against the plan, and Germany’s Minister of Economics and Technology, Dr Philipp Rösler, welcomed the rejection as an “excellent signal” for continuing economic recovery.

This is the third time since the European ETS was established in 2005 that the scheme has come close to collapse. The first was in 2007, when it was discovered that free permits issued to major energy-users exceeded actual emissions; and the second was in January 2009, as a result of the collapse in production at the height of the global financial crisis.

However, the current price for carbon permits is less than half the lowest level reached in 2009.

There are other factors at work, as well. The European ETS is designed to cut carbon dioxide emissions as part of the UN’s plan to tackle global warming. However, there is growing scepticism about the claimed link between CO2 and global temperatures.

The problem is that, despite steadily rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere and hysterical claims of global warming, it is universally accepted that average global temperatures have not risen over the past 15 years. Additionally, Western Europe and North America have experienced several years of extremely cold winters, contradicting claims that the earth is warming.

For example, average temperatures in England in March were just 2.6ºC, which was nearly 4ºC below average, and April temperatures in some places reached their lowest levels for 100 years.

Claims by the UK Met Office, which strongly supports global warming theory, that the freezing temperatures were caused by increased melting of Arctic sea ice are simply not believable.

The London Economist which has long supported the ETS said: “Europe’s flagship environmental policy has just been holed below the water line. On April 16th the European Parliament voted by 334 to 315 to reject proposals which (its supporters claimed) were needed to save the emissions-trading system (ETS) from collapse. Carbon prices promptly fell 40%.

“Some environmentalists fear that the whole edifice of European climate policy could start to crumble. The real question now is whether the scuppering of the ETS will lead to the dismantling of the EU’s climate policies more generally.”

Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said, “Given the manifest reluctance of the world’s big emitters to accept any legally binding carbon targets and in face of our deepening economic crisis, Europe should undertake a comprehensive review of its economically damaging carbon targets and — in the absence of an international agreement — should consider the suspension of all unilateral climate policies that threaten Europe’s economic recovery.”

The collapse of the European ETS will strengthen the hand of Tony Abbott in Australia, who has promised to abolish the carbon tax if elected to office this September.

Mr Abbott’s principled opposition to the tax — maintained in the face of fierce attacks by the government, sections of the media and the Greens — is not only being vindicated as good economic policy, but shows a degree of statesmanship rarely seen in a politician. 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm