April 13th 2013

  Buy Issue 2897

Articles from this issue:

ENVIRONMENT: Media silence over northern hemisphere's deep freeze

CANBERRA OBSERVED: New guard Labor's two colossal mistakes

EDITORIAL: 'Same-sex marriage' push in the US, France and UK

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: What kind of religion is free in the public square?

FAMILY: The not-to-be-missed World Congress of Families, Sydney

FAMILY AND TAX: Restore the family wage by simplifying the tax system

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: The legacy of Labor's leadership fiasco

EUROPEAN UNION: Depositors will bail out failed banks: eurozone chief

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Gathering storm clouds in the East China Sea

HUMAN RIGHTS: Senate urges government action on China organ-harvesting

LIFE ISSUES: AMA Tasmania resists Labor/Greens euthanasia push

LIFE ISSUES: The world's greatest killing machine

EDUCATION: Canberra betrays non-government distance education

SCHOOLING: Western values sacrificed to political correctness

CULTURE: Lessons for Australia in Taiwan's movie revival


CINEMA: Questioning the amorous gaze

BOOK REVIEW Debunking popular misconceptions

BOOK REVIEW From the wartime archives

Books promotion page


News Weekly, April 13, 2013

Tony Abbott and abortion


Politics is about two things: leadership and the art of the possible. What is possible can ultimately only be changed by leadership.

Victorian DLP Senator John Madigan (“Bill to end Medicare-funded abortions for sex selection”, News Weekly, March 16) is showing social leadership around the issue of abortion. Liberal Opposition leader Tony Abbott is focusing on achieving power to do what is possible.

John Madigan bravely seeks to ensure that the issue of abortion does not go the same way as divorce, embryo destruction, and perhaps same-sex marriage.

All of these issues have delivered massive social change in our predominately secular society that looks to the law to determine what is right and wrong. We need to change the rules of the game.

Human life is too precious to be lost through inaction and silence. Senator Madigan is to be commended. We wish Tony Abbott well.

Michael Murphy,
State Secretary,
Victorian branch,
Democratic Labor Party (DLP)


Reforming public finances to tackle surging debt


Changes in government indebtedness over the past 10 years have clearly demonstrated the wide difference in economic philosophy between the ALP and the Liberal Party when in government.

Government indebtedness is best measured as net debt, which is total liabilities minus total financial assets, whether domestic or foreign. It is best measured for the government sector as a whole, because of the predominance and shared partnerships of the Commonwealth government in public finances.

In the financial years 2002-3 to 2006-7, the Liberals ran surpluses in four of those five years — $10 billion, $41 billion, $11 billion, $1 billion and $15 billion, respectively. The accumulated surplus was $58 billion. (Australian Bureau of Statistics data).

In contrast, from 2007-8 to 2011-2, Labor ran five successive deficits — $21 billion, $75 billion, $65 billion, $73 billion and $94 billion, respectively. Labor’s accumulated deficit is $328 billion.

It has been argued that the easing of fiscal policy in the Labor years was justifiable, as it facilitated job-creation responses to the global financial crisis and to business uncertainty. It moderated what would otherwise have been a decline in national wealth-creation.

On the other hand, the need was mitigated by the mining boom and lower interest rates.

In any case, the surge in national debt has left a legacy which may limit or impede future responses to national emergencies, and a need to boost infrastructure spending.

From a historical perspective, the Commonwealth government’s increase in net debt of $220 billion during 2008-12 — bringing the whole of government net debt to $302 billion at June 2012 — was unparalleled.

Australia is poorly placed should it be necessary to further increase government net debt, as a result of a local economic downturn, the global financial crisis, wars or natural disasters.

There will be pressure on Australia’s national debt arising from deferred defence expenditure, the National Broadcasting Network (NBN), the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), Gonski’s education reform, capital spending on the Murray-Darling Basin, and meeting the needs of roads, public transport, health and an ageing population.

To deal with these matters and improve national productivity, public fiscal policy should be adjusted as follows:

1.    Implement debt reduction, tax and spending programs in the public sector.

2.   Revamp public sector accounting and statistics, which are now too complex.

3.   Appoint an expert body to make and publish consistent, best-practice, cost-benefit evaluations/priorities for all major public expenditures.

John P. McAuley (accountant),
Castle Hill, NSW


Lord Monckton in Australia


It is a pity that English climate sceptic Lord Monckton’s recent speaking tour of Australia was not more widely reported.

At a public meeting he addressed in Geelong on March 23, Monckton said that far too many scientists rely on climate-modelling and, worse still, have deliberately massaged the data to produce results to support their claims of a warming trend over the past 150 years.

Monckton was clear that the planet was not under any dire threat of global warming. Polar bears are not an endangered species. The data show that extreme weather events have not been increasing, but decreasing. In addition, there have been no uniform ice melts, and sea levels have been rising 3 cm per century as they have always done.

He said that leading climate-change figures, such as the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, now concede that over the past 16 years global temperatures have been stable and that climate model projections have been grossly exaggerated.

Monkton’s claim that climate change is indeed the greatest moral issue of our time — but not in the sense that Kevin Rudd meant it — raises a pertinent point.

The cost of taking action on global warming now means that billions — even trillions — are to be spent over the next couple of decades, for a result which would barely be measurable on climate (i.e., one-sixteenth of 1C). This money would be better spent on local projects to protect the environment. In addition, for a fraction of the price, we could virtually eliminate poverty from the planet.

Alan Barron,
Grovedale, Vic.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am