April 13th 2013

  Buy Issue 2897

Articles from this issue:

ENVIRONMENT: Media silence over northern hemisphere's deep freeze

CANBERRA OBSERVED: New guard Labor's two colossal mistakes

EDITORIAL: 'Same-sex marriage' push in the US, France and UK

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: What kind of religion is free in the public square?

FAMILY: The not-to-be-missed World Congress of Families, Sydney

FAMILY AND TAX: Restore the family wage by simplifying the tax system

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: The legacy of Labor's leadership fiasco

EUROPEAN UNION: Depositors will bail out failed banks: eurozone chief

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Gathering storm clouds in the East China Sea

HUMAN RIGHTS: Senate urges government action on China organ-harvesting

LIFE ISSUES: AMA Tasmania resists Labor/Greens euthanasia push

LIFE ISSUES: The world's greatest killing machine

EDUCATION: Canberra betrays non-government distance education

SCHOOLING: Western values sacrificed to political correctness

CULTURE: Lessons for Australia in Taiwan's movie revival


CINEMA: Questioning the amorous gaze

BOOK REVIEW Debunking popular misconceptions

BOOK REVIEW From the wartime archives

Books promotion page

Gathering storm clouds in the East China Sea

by Lyndon Burns

News Weekly, April 13, 2013

The confrontation between Japan and China over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea initially rated almost no mention in the Australian media.

The Senkaku Islands.

The dispute was expected to burn itself out long ago, but instead it has progressed from words to shows of force, then to shadow-boxing, and now threatens to boil over into violence.

As the seriousness of the situation has belatedly been recognised, an explanation is being sought for the sudden interest of both parties in these tiny islands. The answer that is in vogue, at least in Australia, is that the islands encompass significant oil and gas reserves, and both sides want to be recognised as rightful owner prior to any exploration.

However, this explanation has three significant flaws.

Firstly, the potential energy reserves are modest: initial estimates have been revised downward, to a figure that is less than a year of China’s consumption at present rates. If one were to weigh the likely value of the reserves against the difficulty of extraction, even a brief military clash would cost more than simply buying oil off the global market. It is even possible that the entire Senkaku field is less valuable than the losses already incurred through the fall in trade with Japan.

Secondly, in areas of disputed sovereignty with more extensive reserves, China has not sought to establish sovereignty first and begin extraction later. The Chunxiao oilfield lies in the overlapping exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of Japan and China; yet here China began development without seeking to have Japan — or anyone else — recognise their claim to the field beforehand.

Finally, China has not previously been confrontational. When development of the Chunxiao field soured relations between China and Japan, the Chinese agreed to co-develop the gas field with Japan, despite laying claim to the entire field. In fact, the Chinese policy had previously been to defer any resolution on the Senkakus rather than provoke a conflict.

The catalyst for the current confrontation was actually an attempt by the Japanese government to maintain the status quo. The nationalist mayor of Tokyo intended to purchase the Senkakus from private owners and develop them, in an attempt to reinforce Japanese sovereignty.

The Japanese government purchased them first, to preclude any development, thereby deferring a decision on the Senkakus yet again. But China reacted with outrage, apparently no longer satisfied with the status quo; the deal to co-development of Chunxiao was abrogated at the same time.

It seems that the Chinese leadership has deliberately reversed its policy on the Senkakus, and is now pushing ahead on a course that is precipitating a crisis. The reason for this change might be found within China, where it is generally accepted that its authoritarian system has been able to retain power by offering its people prosperity and prestige.

China suffered several centuries of turmoil and international humiliation, which reached its climax in the 20th century with prolonged civil war, foreign invasion, famines and purges.

From the ascension of Deng Xiaoping down to the present, the Communist Party has presided over a tremendous economic boom, with an attendant growth in prestige for the country. The regime is still brutally repressive, but there are no more purges, no more famines, no more plundering armies, and China is no longer the plaything of greater powers. Therefore, the Chinese people have largely accepted the status quo. The question has long been what would occur when economic growth began to falter, as is now the case.

The answer appears to be that the Chinese leadership has chosen to distract people from the country’s economic problems by deliberately spoiling for a fight and stoking nationalist fervour.

This is a tried and true method for maintaining power in an authoritarian system. In the first half of the 20th century, fascists elevated this trick to a central tool of statecraft. The intention is that the government poses as the champion of the country’s interest, which earns it gratitude among its subjects, while hatred is directed towards an external enemy.

For this purpose, Japan is seen as an ideal focus of Chinese hostility, as it has long been a traditional enemy of China. The bitterness caused by the vicious Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45) has haunted relations between the two nations.

The Senkaku Islands dispute dovetails with this strategy, since China claims that the islands, along with Taiwan, were ceded to Japan in the humiliating Treaty of Shimonoseki, which ended the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-5).

Both wars were part of the half century of turmoil and debasement that the Chinese Communist Party takes credit for ending after World War II.

As the world watches the gathering storm clouds in the East China Sea, it bears consideration that Beijing might have little interest in easing the tension. Faced with internal difficulties, China’s leaders could fear a loss of face at home more than a military clash abroad — particularly an air-sea battle in the vicinity of Taiwan, the very one for which the People’s Liberation Army has spent the past decade preparing.

Lyndon Burns is a writer from Bendigo, Victoria. 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am