March 30th 2013

  Buy Issue 2896

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: The decline of Australian manufacturing

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: Labor's failure to tackle root causes of soaring cost of living

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Stricken Labor picks fight with media in election year

NEW SOUTH WALES: Widening ripples from Obeid corruption scandal

WA ELECTIONS: Conservative tsunami hits Labor and the Greens in WA

ENVIRONMENT: More alarmism from the Climate Commission

MARRIAGE LAWS: State same-sex marriage laws would be invalid: leading QC

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Push to change ALP and Coalition on marriage

LIFE ISSUES: Tasmanian abortion laws to criminalise dissent

SOCIETY: Radical feminism's war on men, marriage and children

DEFENCE OF FREEDOM: The power of truth: Reagan's 'Evil Empire' speech turns 30

LATIN AMERICA: Death of Venezuela's Hugo Chávez

SOUTH-EAST ASIA: Brunei: a small country alone in a turbulent region


CINEMA: In defence of 3D dreadfuls

BOOK REVIEW The life and death of Roger Casement

Books promotion page

Tasmanian abortion laws to criminalise dissent

by John Ballantyne

News Weekly, March 30, 2013

Tasmanian doctors, nurses and pregnancy counsellors who have conscientious objections to abortion could face fines of up to $65,000, or 12-month jail sentences, under draft laws announced recently by the Tasmanian government.

On International Women’s Day, March 8, Health Minister Michelle O’Byrne, in the Lara Giddings-led Labor-Green coalition government, released the Reproductive Health (Access to Terminations) Bill 2013, which, if passed by Tasmania’s parliament, would give the island-state the most draconian abortion laws outside of communist China.

Ms O’Byrne allowed the public a mere fortnight in which to lodge any comments they might wish to make on the draft legislation. The deadline for submissions was Friday, March 22.

An 18-page government information paper on the draft bill denies that women who undergo abortions suffer any long-term health problems, such as breast cancer or reduced future fertility, or long-term negative mental health outcomes (see page 10).

These assertions are contradicted by numerous studies around the world, recorded in peer-reviewed scholarly journals.

Ms O’Byrne says that she has modelled her draft legislation on Victoria’s Abortion Law Reform Act 2008, which, when it was being debated in parliament, attracted much adverse public comment.

Victoria’s 2008 abortion laws contain a number of controversial provisions, including:

• Failing to provide any support for women who are under pressure from partners or families to undergo abortions.

• Allowing babies to be killed in the womb right up to birth.

• Forcing any Victorian health professional who has a conscientious objection to abortion to refer any woman seeking an abortion to a colleague who has no objection.

A media representative for Human Rights for the Unborn — Tasmania, Mishka Gora, has warned that the provisions of Tasmania’s draft abortion legislation are even more draconian than those of Victoria’s abortion laws.

Says Ms Gora: “The Victorian bill contains no penalties for conscientious objectors; the Tasmanian bill does.

“The Victorian bill doesn’t mention counsellors; the Tasmanian bill threatens counsellors with jail. The Victorian bill doesn’t mention protests; the Tasmanian bill threatens protesters with jail.

“If this bill passes, a part-time volunteer counsellor for an organisation supporting pregnant women could be jailed for a year and fined up to A$65,000 if she refuses to refer a woman to a place where she can get an abortion. The bill’s definition of a counsellor includes anyone who gives ‘advice or information relating to pregnancy options’ and ‘whether or not for fee or reward’. Overnight, all agencies which disagree with abortion will be forced to shut down.

“Medical practitioners will be obliged under threat of a $65,000 fine to make referrals if they have a conscientious objection. To anyone who believes that an unborn child has a right to life, making a referral means cooperating with evil. The proposed laws are coercing participation in the overall process of abortion procurement.

“Nurses who refuse to participate in abortions could be fined $65,000.

“The right to peaceful protest will also be shut down. The bill imposes a 300-metre-wide exclusion zone around abortion clinics. The maximum penalty is 12 months in jail and a $65,000 fine.” (MercatorNet, March 12, 2013).



Mishka Gora, “New frontiers in repressing dissent”, MercatorNet, March 12, 2013.

Babette Francis, “False reassurances: Tasmania’s abortion information paper”, On Line Opinion, March 19, 2013.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am