February 2nd 2013

  Buy Issue 2892

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Wildfires: the avoidable tragedy

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Roxon's law: guilty until proven innocent

QUEENSLAND: Heiner affair: is Cabinet above the rule of law?

RURAL AFFAIRS: Dairy crisis part of wide rural malaise

RADICAL ACTIVISM: Economic saboteur praised by Greens

CLIMATE CHANGE: Rising sea levels: IPCC's latest scare campaign

DEFENCE: Australia and UK slash defence spending

THE ECONOMY: Latest bizarre twist in mining tax saga

LABOUR RELATIONS: From craft to corporation: unionism in Australia

DEVELOPING WORLD: The scandal of maternal and child mortality

LIFE ISSUES: Darkening skies: euthanasia fronts in 2013

FRANCE: Homosexuals support protest against same-sex marriage

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: Breakfast at Tiffany's in the new millennium

CINEMA: New cinematic trilogy for Tolkien fans

BOOK REVIEW Reasons to be cheerful

BOOK REVIEW Postwar enslavement of half of Europe

Books promotion page

Roxon's law: guilty until proven innocent

by national correspondent

News Weekly, February 2, 2013

Nicola Roxon’s long-held naked ambition to become the Commonwealth Attorney-General, and to quickly make her mark in that role, risks making her the most radical chief law-maker since Lionel Murphy.

The Gillard Labor Government’s proposed changes to the Commonwealth Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination laws will over time have a profound affect on freedom of speech and freedom of religion in Australia and will inevitably result in further encroachments of officialdom onto the lives of ordinary Australian citizens.

The government says the changes are designed to make anti-discrimination laws simpler and fairer.

However, the laws are so ambiguous and loose, that they leave open all sorts of legal action against a range of behaviours, from heckling at football matches to colourful turns of phrase commonly used in the Australian lexicon.

Expressing a political opinion in the workplace that causes offence to another workmate could result in the person expressing that opinion being taken to court.

And while Australians pride themselves on having a tolerant society, it is likely these laws will have the reverse effect by encouraging people to embark on litigation as a means to stifle comment, difference of opinion and the personal beliefs of others.

The mainstream media will be further muffled with a new layer of self-censorship because journalists and editors will be forced to be on alert not to write articles or opinions that might offend people with contrary views and particular social backgrounds.

People of faith, especially, will increasingly have to hold in check their personal views and refrain from public expressions of their religion in case it causes offence to minority groups or non-believers. A Christian procession through a neighbourhood with a Muslim presence could constitute offensive behaviour, for example.

The key problem with the proposed changes to the Roxon anti-discrimination laws is that they are being broadened to include any conduct that “offends”, “insults” or “intimidates”.

Not only will it be illegal to discriminate on the grounds of disability, race and religion, but “political opinion” and “social origin” are also to be included. Other new areas where you cannot discriminate against people include industrial history, citizenship and medical history.

But what constitutes these potentially soon-to-be illegal activities will be in the eye or the ear of the offended or insulted.

Current legal protections for the alleged “insulter” or “offender” are to be reduced, as the courts will deem them to be guilty until they can prove their innocence.

Furthermore, rights to legal representation are to be curtailed, and under a provision designed to “streamline costs” the person who is brought to court for having allegedly committed an offence will have to pay their own costs regardless of the outcome of the case.

Penalties will be harsh, ranging from public humiliation in the form of a forced apology to compensation for the offended and imposed censorship by the courts.

The proposed new laws will provide a new body of work for various human rights and equal opportunity commissions around the country.

It is no wonder there have been hundreds of submissions to a parliamentary committee reviewing the legislation.

Various religious groups have expressed their concern, while former NSW Chief Justice and now new chair (sic) of the ABC Jim Spigelman has declared: “The freedom to offend is an integral component of free speech.”

A submission by Australia’s media organisations declared: “No other liberal democracy has a human rights or anti-discrimination statute proscribing conduct which merely offends or insults.”

Ironically, some groups are declaring that the proposed changes to the law are a missed opportunity and are demanding Ms Roxon remove current special exemptions from anti-discrimination laws granted to religious and other groups. For the moment, it seems that removing these exemptions is a step too far for Ms Roxon.

But having secured her dream job in what is possibly the twilight period of the Gillard Government, Roxon is determined not to waste the final months of it.

Ms Roxon was never greatly attached to health. There was no clear reform mandate from Kevin Rudd, and she found it wearying having to adjudicate between the noisy and competing interests in the health sector. Her most notable achievement in the portfolio was in fact a legal victory over the tobacco manufacturers over plain packaging.

By contrast, Roxon’s interest in being Attorney-General stretches back to her younger days as a postgraduate judge’s associate to High Court Justice Mary Gaudron.

Under Mr Rudd, Ms Roxon’s ambitions were blocked because he preferred a more moderate steady-as-she-goes chief law-maker in the form Robert McClelland.

Instead, Ms Roxon, who, according to her Wikipedia entry, is a confirmed atheist, wants to introduce changes to discrimination laws that will have far-reaching unintended consequences for democracy, public discourse and freedom of religion for decades to come.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am