September 29th 2012

  Buy Issue 2885

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Violent Islamism erupts on the streets of Sydney

EDITORIAL: Gillard to cut defence as global tensions mount

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Can Gillard poll upswing save Labor from wipe-out?

FOREIGN INVESTMENT: Cubbie Station sale exposes weak foreign ownership rules

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Labor and Coalition now eager to court the DLP

CONSTRUCTION: Grocon dispute points to return of the BLF

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS: What is productivity and why is it important?

UNITED KINGDOM: Nigel Farage, scourge of Europe's political elites

CULTURE AND CIVILISATION: Education wars: the battle for our children

HUMAN RIGHTS: China announces end to forced abortions

EUTHANASIA: Nitschke offers "undetectable" death by suffocation

HEALTH: Legalising illicit drugs will inflict greater harm


CINEMA: The terrifying truth of the Noble Savage

BOOK REVIEW The original "Red Tory"

BOOK REVIEW Battle of wits in Nazi-occupied Rome

Books promotion page

The original "Red Tory"

News Weekly, September 29, 2012

and the Property-Owning Democracy

by David Torrance

Purchase NOEL SKELTON  and the Property-Owning Democracy

(London: Biteback Publishing)
Hardcover: 283 pages
ISBN: 9781849540117
RRP: AUD$74.95


Reviewed by John Ballantyne


“The property-owning democracy” was a term coined in 1923 by a Scottish Conservative politician, Noel Skelton, to describe his vision of a just social order.

His thinking had a major impact on a younger generation of up-and-coming British Conservative MPs at the time. After World War II, three of them — Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan and Alec Douglas-Home — would each in turn serve as prime minister.

 Today, however, Skelton himself is relatively little-remembered. He was first elected to the House of Commons in 1922. In 1935, still an MP, he died of cancer at the age of only 55. The highest ministerial post he held was parliamentary under-secretary for Scotland.

In 1923, the Spectator magazine commissioned Skelton to write a short series of opinion pieces in which he used the phrase “the property-owning democracy” for the first time.

For a self-identified conservative intellectual, he was surprisingly open to advocating radical policies. In his Spectator series (which is reproduced in the biography’s appendix), he argued that “the success and the stability of civilisation depend upon the widest possible extension amongst its citizens of the private ownership of property”.

To bring this state of affairs about he advocated four particular measures:

1) For the wage-earner, whether in factory or in field, industrial co-partnership and profit-sharing;

2) For the agriculturalist, who seeks to become completely his own master, small ownership;

3) For the rural world as a whole, agricultural co-operation; and

4) For the community, to secure it against sudden assault, the referendum.

True to his principles, Skelton in 1924 didn’t hesitate to support a housing bill then being piloted through the House of Commons by firebrand Red Clydesider John Wheatley. Skelton saw this legislation, which aimed to construct 190,000 new council houses at rents working-class people could afford, as entirely in keeping with his vision for promoting greater home ownership.

Skelton, during his public career, sought to persuade his Conservative Party colleagues to make a genuine effort to bridge the economic gulf between capital and labour. He wrote: “Since, to-day, practically all citizens have political rights, all should possess something of their own. Mocked and jeered at in the past as ‘the Party of Property’, it is precisely as such, now that the wheel has turned full circle, that Conservatism in the new era holds in its keeping the key to the problem.”

Torrance, in his scholarly and very readable biography of Skelton, tries to see the development of Skelton’s thought as part of the progressive “One Nation” tradition of Benjamin Disraeli, whose Conservative governments in Victorian Britain sought to improve the lot of the poor. Torrance is right to identify Skelton with this tradition, but only up to a point.

English political philosopher Phillip Blond, in his widely discussed book Red Tory (2010), more accurately traces the pedigree of Skelton’s thought to the “distributist” ideas developed before World War I by Catholic intellectuals Hilaire Belloc and G.K. Chesterton. Torrance does acknowledge Blond’s point, but only very briefly on the last couple of pages of his biography.

In fact, 11 years before Skelton coined the term “property-owning democracy”, Belloc published his famous political tract, The Servile State. In it he warned against an accelerating tendency he had observed in modern society for inequalities to increase and for wealth and ownership to be concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.

His friend and political ally, Chesterton, once observed that the problem of capitalism was not the presence of too many capitalists “but too few capitalists”.

The antidote to this, according to Belloc and Chesterton, was not, as the Fabian Society and much of the Labour Party believed, for government to nationalise the means of production and centrally plan the economy.

The solution was to adopt measures designed to promote the widest possible degree of ownership of private property and capital. The name Belloc and Chesterton gave their creed of widespread private ownership was distributism.

Distributism, although not as widely understood as the better-known political programs of socialism and the free market, has lingered on in one form or another over the past 100 years. Those influenced by distributist ideas have included:

    Noel Skelton and his intellectual followers in Britain’s Conservative Party;

•     German economist Wilhelm Röpke, a key architect of the postwar West German Christian Democrats’ “social market economy”;

•     Australia’s B.A. “Bob” Santamaria, the National Catholic Rural Movement (NCRM) and the Democratic Labor Party. (On its formation in 1955, the DLP adopted as its slogan, “Property for All”);

•     America’s Dr Allan Carlson and his Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society; and

•     England’s “Red Tory” Phillip Blond and his ResPublica think tank.

It is high time for modern-day conservative parties to look beyond the ideas espoused by free-market think-tanks and to discover how much the distributist tradition has to offer.

David Torrance has performed a valuable political service by producing this excellent biography of one of the finest distributists, Noel Skelton.

John Ballantyne is editor of News Weekly

Purchase this book at the bookshop:


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am