September 1st 2012


  Buy Issue 2883
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The left's paranoid creed of "world purificationism"

EDITORIAL: Hidden cost of the Greens' agenda

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Questions about PM and AWU that won't go away

OPINION: Why we must defend the institution of marriage

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Hope for people who struggle with same-sex attraction

HEALTH: South Australia braces for new euthanasia bill

LAW: Roxon set to make key High Court appointments

FINANCE: Beware the superannuation pea-and-thimble trick

COMPETITION: Small retailers challenge power of big supermarkets

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Soaring inflation hits Iranian regime

LIFE ISSUES: Pioneering law saves the unborn, protects women

SOCIETY: How "social infertility" fails children

SOCIETY: Lone girl on the train a child of our time

LETTERS

CINEMA: Something rotten in the state of Denmark

BOOK REVIEW The untold story of the Santamaria Movement's operations in Asia

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

COMPETITION:
Small retailers challenge power of big supermarkets


by John Ballantyne

News Weekly, September 1, 2012

Supermarket giants Coles and Woolworths are undermining market competition to the detriment of small, independent retailers, according to a major report recently released by the Master Grocers Australia (MGA) and Liquor Retailers Australia (LRA).

However, this has been disputed by Margy Osmond, the CEO of the Australian National Retailers Association (ANRA), which represents the big supermarket chains. She attacked the report, saying it was “long on accusations and short on facts”.

“The Master Grocers Australia (MGA) report is designed to be as sensational as possible at the expense of two highly successful Australian companies, Coles and Woolworths,” Mrs Osmond said.

The MGA and LRA, in its 56-page report, Let’s Have Fair Competition! The risk of losing retail diversity, choice and true competition in the Australian supermarket industry, have chronicled the astonishing growth of the two supermarket giants over the last few decades and are calling on the federal government and competition watchdog, the ACCC, to ensure the survival of smaller retailers through changes to planning and competition laws.

In 1975, Woolworths and Coles jointly held only about 34 per cent of the Australian grocery market. Today, they account for about 80 per cent. The report says: “This is believed to be the most extreme example of grocery market domination in the developed world.”

The relentless expansion of the two supermarket giants, says the report, “is denying an outlet for local suppliers and manufacturers as their products are replaced by overseas sourced ones retailed as store brands. The impacts on local communities and local economies are often abrupt and severe.

“This report reveals a number of anti-competitive policies and practices that depend on enormous market power, including: anti-competitive price discrimination, shopper docket schemes, ‘store saturation’ strategies and over-sized store strategies.”

In his foreword to the report, economist John Wallace, who worked 10 years for the Industries Assistance Commission (now the Productivity Commission), said: “There is little public awareness of the adverse effects that the ‘competition’ between Australia’s major supermarket chains is having on the welfare of Australians.”

Associate Professor Robin Goodman, director of the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute at Victoria’s RMIT University, in a separate foreword, warned that “the practices of the two corporations (which) overwhelmingly dominate the grocery market in Australia’s grocery market, are having a serious impact on existing town centres”.

He said: “Town centres are not only business and employment centres, they are the social hearts of local communities. Traditional main street retailing provides a reason for people to gather, a place to meet and socialise, and a chance to connect and maintain a sense of community.

“The large supermarket surrounded by its sea of car parking does not invite pedestrian traffic. Customers drive in and drive out, making isolated single destination visits.

“Planners are increasingly seeing a role for themselves in creating places which encourage walking and decrease car dependence. Main street shopping does this in a way that a large supermarket does not.” 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm