September 1st 2012

  Buy Issue 2883

Articles from this issue:

COVER STORY: The left's paranoid creed of "world purificationism"

EDITORIAL: Hidden cost of the Greens' agenda

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Questions about PM and AWU that won't go away

OPINION: Why we must defend the institution of marriage

GENDER AND IDENTITY: Hope for people who struggle with same-sex attraction

HEALTH: South Australia braces for new euthanasia bill

LAW: Roxon set to make key High Court appointments

FINANCE: Beware the superannuation pea-and-thimble trick

COMPETITION: Small retailers challenge power of big supermarkets

FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Soaring inflation hits Iranian regime

LIFE ISSUES: Pioneering law saves the unborn, protects women

SOCIETY: How "social infertility" fails children

SOCIETY: Lone girl on the train a child of our time


CINEMA: Something rotten in the state of Denmark

BOOK REVIEW The untold story of the Santamaria Movement's operations in Asia

Books promotion page

Small retailers challenge power of big supermarkets

by John Ballantyne

News Weekly, September 1, 2012

Supermarket giants Coles and Woolworths are undermining market competition to the detriment of small, independent retailers, according to a major report recently released by the Master Grocers Australia (MGA) and Liquor Retailers Australia (LRA).

However, this has been disputed by Margy Osmond, the CEO of the Australian National Retailers Association (ANRA), which represents the big supermarket chains. She attacked the report, saying it was “long on accusations and short on facts”.

“The Master Grocers Australia (MGA) report is designed to be as sensational as possible at the expense of two highly successful Australian companies, Coles and Woolworths,” Mrs Osmond said.

The MGA and LRA, in its 56-page report, Let’s Have Fair Competition! The risk of losing retail diversity, choice and true competition in the Australian supermarket industry, have chronicled the astonishing growth of the two supermarket giants over the last few decades and are calling on the federal government and competition watchdog, the ACCC, to ensure the survival of smaller retailers through changes to planning and competition laws.

In 1975, Woolworths and Coles jointly held only about 34 per cent of the Australian grocery market. Today, they account for about 80 per cent. The report says: “This is believed to be the most extreme example of grocery market domination in the developed world.”

The relentless expansion of the two supermarket giants, says the report, “is denying an outlet for local suppliers and manufacturers as their products are replaced by overseas sourced ones retailed as store brands. The impacts on local communities and local economies are often abrupt and severe.

“This report reveals a number of anti-competitive policies and practices that depend on enormous market power, including: anti-competitive price discrimination, shopper docket schemes, ‘store saturation’ strategies and over-sized store strategies.”

In his foreword to the report, economist John Wallace, who worked 10 years for the Industries Assistance Commission (now the Productivity Commission), said: “There is little public awareness of the adverse effects that the ‘competition’ between Australia’s major supermarket chains is having on the welfare of Australians.”

Associate Professor Robin Goodman, director of the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute at Victoria’s RMIT University, in a separate foreword, warned that “the practices of the two corporations (which) overwhelmingly dominate the grocery market in Australia’s grocery market, are having a serious impact on existing town centres”.

He said: “Town centres are not only business and employment centres, they are the social hearts of local communities. Traditional main street retailing provides a reason for people to gather, a place to meet and socialise, and a chance to connect and maintain a sense of community.

“The large supermarket surrounded by its sea of car parking does not invite pedestrian traffic. Customers drive in and drive out, making isolated single destination visits.

“Planners are increasingly seeing a role for themselves in creating places which encourage walking and decrease car dependence. Main street shopping does this in a way that a large supermarket does not.” 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am