August 18th 2012

  Buy Issue 2882

Articles from this issue:

DEFENCE OF MARRIAGE: Marriage, religious liberty and the 'grand bargain'

TASMANIA: Labor/Greens push for same-sex marriage

EDITORIAL: Olympic Games: end the hype and chauvinism

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Prime Minister Gillard seeks to make her mark on history

GLOBAL WARMING: Climate alarmism is alive and well

BANKING: Playing with someone else's money

EDUCATION: School learning dumped in favour of Google-and-tell

OPINION: Syria: Why are we encouraging chaos?

SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE: Media shrugs while Russian espionage flourishes

FOREIGN AID: When aid money means killing money

OBITUARY: A humble man with a large vision: Mark Posa (1927-2012)


CINEMA: 3D super-hero takes to the big screen

BOOK REVIEW An admirable spur to further thought

BOOK REVIEW The divorce that shook Europe

Books promotion page

The divorce that shook Europe

News Weekly, August 18, 2012

Henry VIII and his Italian Ambassador

Purchase OUR MAN IN ROME: Henry VIII and his Italian Ambassador

by Catherine Fletcher

(London: The Bodley Head),
Hardcover: 288 pages
ISBN: 9781847921765
RRP: AUD$59.95


Reviewed by Michael E. Daniel


Dr Catherine Fletcher, a lecturer in early modern history at Durham University, has managed to say something new about England’s King Henry VIII’s unsuccessful attempts to persuade the Vatican to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon.

Some 500 years after the events in question, hitherto unknown documents found in an English country estate have shed new light on the annulment proceedings, particularly on the pivotal role of Italian freelance diplomat Gregorio “The Cavalier” Casali, Henry’s ambassador to the Papal States.

In today’s world, engaging a foreigner as one’s ambassador may seem anomalous. However, this was a standard practice in Tudor times, with Henry VIII also employing other members of the Casali family as ambassadors.

Dr Fletcher’s study begins with an account of Henry’s secret commission in England (known as the king’s “Great Matter”) into the validity of his 1509 marriage to Catherine of Aragon, the widow of his late older brother Arthur, especially after Catherine had failed to provide Henry with a male heir.

Rumours of his desire to have his marriage annulled soon reached the Vatican. Henry’s timing could not have been worse as it coincided with the sack of Rome by the troops of the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, the nephew of Catherine of Aragon.

For the next six years, the Italian Casali was to be a key go-between in Henry’s attempts to secure an annulment from the Vatican.

However, during this period, the political situation remained adverse to Henry’s aspirations. The Medici Pope Clement VII, after having negotiated a peace with the Holy Roman Emperor, sought his assistance to facilitate the restoration of his family’s rule in Florence.

Fletcher indicates that ultimately Charles may have been prepared to tolerate the divorce had Catherine of Aragon been prepared to co-operate. Both he and Clement feared the possibility of a northern European prince defecting from Rome and allying himself with German Protestant princes.

During much of this period, however, it was never Henry’s intention to break with Rome, even though many key actions on Henry’s part are often viewed retrospectively as deliberate steps in that direction. For example, Fletcher suggests that Henry’s actions against his former right-hand man, Thomas Cardinal Wolsey were attempts to apply pressure on Clement.

Fletcher contends that even while Henry toyed with the idea of breaking with Rome, he still maintained ties until comparatively late in proceedings. Thus, Henry was eager that his nomination of Thomas Cranmer as archbishop of Canterbury in 1532 be endorsed by the Holy See. The point of no return seems to have been Henry’s secret marriage on January 25, 1533, to Anne Boleyn — possibly hastened by the fact that Anne was already pregnant.

This was followed by Parliament ruling Henry’s former marriage to Catherine of Aragon invalid. Clement thereupon ordered Henry to repudiate Anne and return to Catherine within one month under pain of excommunication. Henry ignored the Pope’s ultimatum, and the excommunication was enforced in mid-1533.

As an Italian, Casali had intimate knowledge of the workings of the Papal court, and, during much of the negotiation process, Henry afforded him considerable latitude in negotiating on his behalf with the Pope. Even when Henry sent envoys, such as Stephen Gardiner, directly to Rome, Casali remained a key figure in assisting them to undertake the tasks Henry gave them to do.

For example, early in the negotiations Casali lobbied Clement unsuccessfully to delegate to the papal legate sent to England the full power to annul the marriage. However, later in proceedings, Henry’s strategy changed, with Casali being a key player in attempting to stall the hearing of the case, as the political situation in Italy was deemed adverse to Henry being able to secure a divorce.

Throughout the narrative, Fletcher demonstrates that Casali was also serving — and at various points — advancing his family’s interests. His choice of wife not only benefited his social standing but afforded him a certain amount of wealth. However, this was offset by the expenses incurred by Casali in maintaining the lifestyle expected of a diplomat. Later in the proceedings, Henry’s agent Richard Croke sent the king adverse reports of Casali’s dealings. Nevertheless, despite these and Casali’s ultimate failure to secure the divorce, Henry still rewarded him with a castle in England.

Past interpretations of Henry VIII’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon and marriage to Anne Boleyn have tended to emphasise either the political or canonical aspects. Fletcher clearly prefers the political interpretation.

The canonical interpretation — traditionally favoured by Catholic historians — is that notwithstanding the political background, Clement could not have granted an annulment because the validity of Henry’s first marriage was beyond any doubt. Fletcher acknowledges that, notwithstanding Henry’s efforts to obtain opinions of university professors favourable to the divorce, the canonical arguments in Henry’s favour were weak.

Our Man in Rome is an interesting study of an overlooked figure in this seminal event in English history.

The narrative at times is dry. However, Fletcher’s work is a significant to historical scholarship in that it challenges the simplistic interpretation that Henry failed to secure the annulment because his agents were Englishmen operating in an Italian milieu. The work also contains interesting vignettes on diplomatic life, particularly in 16th-century Papal Rome.

Purchase this book at the bookshop:


Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am