August 18th 2012


  Buy Issue 2882
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

DEFENCE OF MARRIAGE: Marriage, religious liberty and the 'grand bargain'

TASMANIA: Labor/Greens push for same-sex marriage

EDITORIAL: Olympic Games: end the hype and chauvinism

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Prime Minister Gillard seeks to make her mark on history

GLOBAL WARMING: Climate alarmism is alive and well

BANKING: Playing with someone else's money

EDUCATION: School learning dumped in favour of Google-and-tell

OPINION: Syria: Why are we encouraging chaos?

SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE: Media shrugs while Russian espionage flourishes

FOREIGN AID: When aid money means killing money

OBITUARY: A humble man with a large vision: Mark Posa (1927-2012)

LETTERS

CINEMA: 3D super-hero takes to the big screen

BOOK REVIEW An admirable spur to further thought

BOOK REVIEW The divorce that shook Europe

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

LETTERS




News Weekly, August 18, 2012

The good, the true and the beautiful

Sir,

Brian J. Coman’s “mordant reflection” on culture and modernity (News Weekly, August 4, 2012) is a timely reminder that we are in danger of forgetting the essential meaning of the word “culture”. May I add a footnote in support of Dr Coman’s views?

Latin cultura, being an action noun, denotes the act of cultivating, with agriculture as its appropriate model. Under pagan and Christian influences it came to evoke an ongoing labour: the cultivation of the good, the true, the beautiful. Its fruits included the trans-historical community of well-furnished minds.

Now, instead of such constant tillage, we are raising a generation more used to heedless, disconnected “grabs” from the latest technology than to the consecutive, laborious pursuit of knowledge.

Our universities, in the words of some of their spokesmen, are promoted more and more in industrial and marketing terms. They are in fact complicit in a betrayal of our Western European origins, history, traditions, languages.

Any absolutes or ideals we may seek are lost in the corrosive relativism of “cultural studies”, ominously so called.

Stan Scott,
Croydon, Vic.

 

Unions and superannuation

Sir,

Martin O’Connell (Letters, News Weekly, July 21) missed a great opportunity to tell us all how good the industry super funds really are.

He could have told us that they pay no commissions or make any donations to the ALP or unions, and that would have set readers minds at ease. He mentions he was a director of a union super fund. Did he receive remuneration?

He also mentions shareholders — who are they? The relevant union?

Maybe if the returns are so good, they may accept investments from self-managed super funds (that’s me ).

I also support union super funds — but only if I know that all is clean and there are no “rip-offs” going on.

I spent 41 years in general insurance and, as a broker in the latter part of that time, I also sold super policies; so I think I have seen all the rip-offs there are.

I saw plenty of instances where the new member lost the first one or two years’ contributions as “fees and charges”, and of course the first premiums were supposed to be the longest investment by the member.

Des Goonan,
Wagga Wagga, NSW

 

Australia at war

Sir,

In response to Hal Colebatch’s letter (News Weekly, August 4), I do not wish to do more than correct a major historical error.

He claims that the Japanese lost “about 50 aircraft” when Vice-Admiral Chuichi Nagumo sortied into the Indian Ocean on March 26, 1942 with his First Carrier Striking Force. He says, “This weakened [the Japanese Navy], perhaps decisively, for the Battle of Midway.”

I have searched every World War II history source that I can access on this topic and have found no reference to Japanese aircraft losses exceeding 16 (from an original total of no fewer than 270). This small aircraft loss would not have significantly affected the operational capability of the Nagumo carrier force.

The historical fact is that Japanese carrier action in the Indian Ocean in March-April 1942 had no relevance for the Battle of Midway (June 4-6, 1942), as Dr Colebatch claims.

The Japanese carrier line-up at Midway was missing two of its powerful fleet carriers, Zuikaku and Shokaku; but their absence at Midway was caused by carrier damage and aircraft losses sustained in the Battle of the Coral Sea (May 7-8, 1942).

James Bowen,
Glen Waverley, Vic.

 

Wartime strikes

Sir,

Max Hastings’ recent study, All Hell Let Loose: The World at War 1939-1945, reviewed by Bill James (News Weekly, August 4), unfortunately appears to repeat one of Australian history’s most pernicious myths.

When Hitler invaded the Soviet Union in June 1941, communist sabotage of Australian war industries, such as coal-fields and on waterfronts, and warship repairs and maintenance, did indeed decrease. However, the instance of industrial strikes actually increased, apart from a period in 1942. Details are given in the various Commonwealth Year Books.

Several people close to Prime Minister John Curtin, including his successor Ben Chifley, claimed it was these strikes that killed Curtin. Sir Robert Menzies’ war prime ministership has been frequently criticised, but he deserves great credit for dealing with the strikes as effectively as he did.

Australia’s war effort, as far as left-dominated unions were concerned, remained virtually treasonous. It took almost as long — in some cases longer — to build a 850-ton corvette-minesweeper in Australia as to build a 35,000-ton aircraft-carrier in America. War production in many Australian industries, compared to that of, say, Canada, was lamentable, both before and after 1941.

These facts have been virtually suppressed by Australia’s corrupt academic history industry. I have spoken to several military-historical groups on this subject, giving facts and figures, and found they are almost completely unknown.

It is hard to know why these post-1941 strikes occurred. Two possible explanations are (1) that the communist unions’ Soviet masters had no real interest in the Pacific War apart from hindering America, or (2) that the strikers were not communists at all, but part of the left-wing of the Labor movement, possibly with some Trotskyite influence.

Hal G.P. Colebatch,
Nedlands, WA




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

Frequently asked questions about section 18C (Simon Breheny)

Chilean legislators kill explicit sex-ed program (LifeSite News)

France to ban people with Down syndrome from smiling (The Huffington Post)

Child abuse and family structure: What is the evidence telling us (Family First NZ)

Woolworths beats ACCC supplier mistreatment case (Eli Greenblat)

Australia set to ride the quantum computing wave (Science in Public)

Weatherill warns states could introduce carbon prices (Rosie Lewis)

Green-left legerdemain doesn't make religion relevant (Fr James Grant)

Mass murderer Castro dies unpunished (Augusto Zimmermann)

The rise of political correctness (Angelo Codevilla)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm