June 9th 2012


  Buy Issue 2877
Qty:

Articles from this issue:

EDITORIAL: Manipulating language to transform culture

CANBERRA OBSERVED: Who will lead the Nationals after the next election?

VICTORIA: Can stalling Baillieu government survive beyond one term?

WATER: Farmer anger over latest Murray-Darling Basin plan

OPINION: Doctors under fire for defending marriage

SOCIETY: World Congress of Families rejects same-sex unions

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Rural Australia, heartland of the nation

DEFENCE: Labor's defence cuts will take years to remedy

SOCIETY: UK call to protect children from internet porn

POPULATION I: Sayonara — the long goodbye to Japan

POPULATION II: China's demographic time bomb

UNITED STATES: Will opinion shift finally make abortion history?

OPINION: Bonus scheme degrades teachers' sense of team spirit

CINEMA: Compelling film's contrast of good and evil

BOOK REVIEW A sensationalist and arrogant book

Books promotion page

survey link

FONT SIZE:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS:
Rural Australia, heartland of the nation


by Jeffry Babb

News Weekly, June 9, 2012

Most Australians have their lives narrowly defined by the five conurbations on the coast, but most of the nation’s wealth is created by the one-third of the population that lives in the bush.

And, as WA Nationals’ leader Brendon Grylls has shown with his Royalties for Regions policy, discontent in the bush can be electoral dynamite.

The Nationals’ Royalties for Regions scheme earmarks 25 per cent of WA’s income from mining and petroleum royalties for use in regions outside of WA’s major centres, in particular Perth.

The Royalties for Regions scheme was the price the Nationals extracted for supporting the Liberal government led by Colin Barnett. It has proved to be a runaway success, and has almost single-handedly rescued the WA Nationals from electoral oblivion. When the bush asserts itself, it can have a powerful political voice.

According to recent polling released by Roy Morgan Research in its presentation, State of the Nation — Focus on Rural Australia (May 18, 2012), rural people tend to be more conservative in their social values and take social values more seriously than urban populations.

In response to the statement, “Homosexual couples should be allowed to adopt children”, 55.2 per cent of urban people agreed, while 47.8 per cent of rural respondents agreed — a gap of more than 7 per cent. Similar results were found on other issues. Country people are consistently more conservative.

Due to the nature of country towns, actions which might have a relatively minor effect on a city the size of Melbourne or Brisbane can have a devastating impact on a country town.

Take technical and further education, for example. A TAFE college is a business. The director has to balance the books.

A TAFE college not only employs lecturers, but also educates students who will add to the skill level of the local economy. It also employs subcontractors and suppliers, from cleaners and maintenance personnel to suppliers of textbooks and other course requirements. A TAFE college is an institution that generates a lot business activity in a country town, far beyond its educational mission.

Educational institutions can also hold young people in rural areas. Many young people leave rural areas to seek better employment or education. According to Census data, both young people under 20 and older people over 50 are over-represented in the rural population.

Young people tend to leave for the educational and employment opportunities that are available in the cities and return to the country later in life. The trend to leave when young and to return when old accelerated between 2001 and 2006.

Rural areas tend to be populated far more by “old Aussies” than are urban areas. Just on 84 per cent of people in rural areas were born in Australia, compared to 63 per cent in cities. Just over 2 per cent of the population in rural areas was born in Asia, compared to 14 per cent in the cities. Similar, though smaller, imbalances existed for people born in the UK and Ireland, Europe and New Zealand.

One thing that city and country folk agree on is that foreign ownership of farmland is undesirable. Some 74 per cent of respondents in both rural and urban areas say foreign ownership of farmland is not good for Australia. This has the potential to become a very big issue.

Foreign ownership of farmland is the number one political issue in New Zealand. New Zealand has about the same area and population as Victoria and is much more dependent on agriculture, in particular dairying, than is Australia.

There is no easy way to tell what percentage of farmland is owned by foreigners. One educated guess — and that is all it is — is that foreign interests own 11 per cent of Australia’s farmland. To keep track of just who owns what, it has been mooted that Australia should maintain a register of foreign-owned land, but so far nothing has resulted.

China, in particular, is pushing hard for improved access to Australian land and businesses. The current Australia-China free-trade talks are stuck on the issue of access to these by Chinese state-owned companies. China has demanded that Australia treat Chinese government-owned companies the same as private ones.

“We bought fortune to the Australians,” Chinese Academy of International Trade and Cooperation researcher Mei Xinyu said in an interview with the Australian Financial Review (May 24, 2012): “However, they treat us like an enemy. The investment environment in Australia is not good at all.

“It is not good for Australia to have so many restrictions on mining investment. They will change their attitude after a big drop in foreign investment.

“We shouldn’t encourage Chinese enterprises to invest in Australia because of the unfavourable investment environment there.

“Australia will have a right attitude towards their client when they face a bearish commodity market in a few years.” 




























Join email list

Join e-newsletter list


Your cart has 0 items



Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers



Trending articles

NATIONAL AFFAIRS Cardinal rebuts commission's 'Get Pell' campaign

COVER STORY Anti-discrimination law validates Safe Schools

U.S. AFFAIRS First Brexit, now Trump: it's the economy, stupid!

INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT Wikileaks reveals U.S, funding behind anti-coal campaign

COVER STORY QUT discrimination case exposes Human Rights Commission failings

FOREIGN AFFAIRS How the left whitewashed Fidel Castro

ANALYSIS What is possible to a Trump Whitehouse



News and views from around the world

19-year-old homeschooled pro-lifer wins Ontario election by landslide (Lianne Laurence)

Trump makes right choice for education secretary (National Review)

Transgender conformity (Katherine Kersten)

Sex education programs do not reduce teen pregnancy or STI rates (Philippa Taylor)

Photographer who captured Safe Schools founder harassing bystander shuts down business (Frank Chung)

Is the global middle class here to stay? (Samuel Rines)

Donald Trump could end America's new feudalism (Joel Kotkin)

It just got easier to find the perpetrators of Stalin's purges (David Filipov)

Castro's death eradicate bacillus of old-style Marxism (Gerald Warner)

Labor MP Terri Butler in QUT race case apology (Geoff Chambers)



























© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
December 2, 2016, 2:36 pm