July 14th 2001

  Buy Issue 2612

Articles from this issue:

COVER: Singapore's economic lessons for Australia

Canberra Observed: Electoral map shows uphill battle for Coalition

Falling fertility debate reignited

Dissenters highlight dangers in UN report

Cloning: how far will states ban go?

Keep the single selling desk for wheat

The Media

Straws in the Wind

Letter: Export figures disputed

Minister resists competition push

Mass destruction in the future

Manufacturing and the sinew of war

Is corporate cost cutting becoming lethal?

French applaud 35-hour week

Books: Colonial Consorts, by Marguerite Hancock

Books: The China Threat - How the People's Republic Targets America, Bill Gertz

Letter: Barley story wrong

Letter: Trade, US-style

Letter: Riddle solved

Books promotion page

Letter: Export figures disputed

by Brian Fisher, ABARE

News Weekly, July 14, 2001


I refer to comments made recently in News Weekly concerning Australian trade policies and the size of the domestic market for agricultural products.

You draw attention to work by Dr Mark McGovern of the Queensland University of Technology. He has argued that exports are much less important to Australian agricultural than is maintained by ABARE and other organisations such as the department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the National Farmers Federation.

Unfortunately, Dr McGovern's arguments are misleading and may result in confusion on the part of your readers. His assessment of the proportion of agricultural production exported is based on an inappropriately narrow interpretation of input- output statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

It is correct that Australian agricultural supplies around 22 per cent of its production to exports directly in the form of unprocessed products such as grains, greasy wool and live animals.

However, this only tells part of the story. In order to gain a proper understanding of the importance of exports, we also need to take account of the farm level value of agricultural products shipped after processing into a form required by our overseas customers. Examples of these include meat and dairy products, sugar, wine, and scoured wool. It is clearly wrong to ignore them when attempting to estimate the proportion of farm production that is exported.

ABARE's most recent published estimates of the value of farm output going to export are contained in the March 2001 issue of Australian Commodities (pages 20-21). In 1999-2000 an estimated 64 per cent of farm output (in value terms) was exported.

This figure, which is net of any additional processing and transport, is consistent with estimates for the other years of the late 1990s. In each of those years between 60 and 70 per cent of production was exported with year to year variations in the number being due largely to the effect of seasonal conditions on crop size and livestock turnoff. For readers who may be interested, the methodology used to come up with the above estimates is described in ABARE's December 2000 issue of Australian Commodities (page 596).

The ABARE research confirms that individual agricultural products are heavily reliant on export markets. In the late 1990s, exported shares of production were 78 per cent for wheat, 65 per cent for barley, 71 per cent pulses, 88 per cent for cotton, 80 per cent for sugar and 62 per cent for beef. These are some of the largest and most valuable agricultural industries in Australia. Anyone suggesting, as Dr McGovern's arguments imply, that Australian farmers do not produce commodities such as sugar or beef for export is plainly wrong.

The fallacy of Dr McGovern's assertions about the relative unimportance of exports to Australian agriculture can also be demonstrated by considering the likely consequences of losing access to key export markets. In such an event, there would need to be substantial (even enormous) increase in domestic consumption in order to absorb current levels of agricultural production. To achieve such increases in consumption, both retail and farm gate prices for many agricultural products would have to decline to an extreme degree. Many of our existing farmers and associated businesses could be expected to cease operation because of substantially reduced earnings.

By way of example, I am sure that no one would want a repeat of what happened to Queensland's beef industry in the mid-1970s. Access to the Japanese market was suddenly denied and the quota restrictions on beef imports tightened in the European Community and the United States. Cattle prices fell to disastrous levels and did not begin to recover until the Australian Government negotiated a re-opening of the Japanese market and our producers had substantially cut herd numbers and production.

Finally after many years of research and interaction with farmers and agribusinesses, I am thoroughly convinced that growth in trade and improved access to international markets will remain the cornerstone of success for many of Australia's agricultural industries.

Agriculture stands to gain substantially from further negotiated liberalisation of both regional and global trading arrangements. Improved market access will provide our farmers and agribusiness with better opportunities to expand their enterprises whilst meeting the needs of the ultimate users of their products - domestic and overseas consumers.

Brian Fisher,
Executive Director,
Canberra, ACT

  • Editor's Note: Dr Mark McGovern will reply to ABARE's criticisms in the next issue.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am