July 14th 2001

  Buy Issue 2612

Articles from this issue:

COVER: Singapore's economic lessons for Australia

Canberra Observed: Electoral map shows uphill battle for Coalition

Falling fertility debate reignited

Dissenters highlight dangers in UN report

Cloning: how far will states ban go?

Keep the single selling desk for wheat

The Media

Straws in the Wind

Letter: Export figures disputed

Minister resists competition push

Mass destruction in the future

Manufacturing and the sinew of war

Is corporate cost cutting becoming lethal?

French applaud 35-hour week

Books: Colonial Consorts, by Marguerite Hancock

Books: The China Threat - How the People's Republic Targets America, Bill Gertz

Letter: Barley story wrong

Letter: Trade, US-style

Letter: Riddle solved

Books promotion page

Letter: Barley story wrong

by Russell Savage MLA

News Weekly, July 14, 2001


I would welcome the opportunity to provide some facts about the Victorian Government decision to implement the Coalition legislation to deregulate the export barley market.

This might assist your readers to make a judgement about Pat Byrne's analysis of the issue (News Weekly, June 30).

The Australian Barley Board argued its monopoly generated a $15 million economic benefit, of which $11 million came from feed barley exports to Japan.

However, Victoria is fundamentally different from the other states. Sixty per cent of Victorian barley is sold into a deregulated domestic market and nobody, including the National Party, has argued it should be re-regulated.

The bulk of the 40 per cent exported is malt, not feed. The Government's consultant concluded that "on average Victorian feed barley accounts for only three to four per cent of all ABB Grain Export Ltd feed barley exports".

I understand Victoria exports around 350,000 tonnes of the 650,000 tonnes of malt barley grown here every year. Of that, forward estimates suggest the deregulated container trade, to which the VFF, ABB and the Coalition were opposed only a few years ago, could account for 60,000-80,000 tonnes

I gather half a dozen new traders have developed this market.

The main market for malt barley is China, and I believe that, until recently, the ABB has been selling predominantly to China National Cereals Oils and Foodstuffs Corp (COFCO) and China Resources Group. China de-regulated barley imports in 1996, but COFCO, the previous monopoly, has been able to maintain its dominant position because China has imposed a 35 per cent tariff on processed malt.

However, the Chinese maltsters are campaigning to remove this tariff and, I am told, are likely to be successful before 2004. The maltsters will then be able to buy processed malt, in which the world trade is greater than it is for malt barley, from the USA and Europe.

The consequence of the ABB simply taking barley off the farm, tipping it in a ship and selling it is that the board does not have processing facilities or cleaning or grading facilities, and only limited barley segregation. These deficiencies and a loss of market share by COFCO and China Resources Group could prove costly.

Calling the barley board a "single desk" is misleading. ABB Grain Export Ltd is a private company (the largest shareholder being a foreign company) that seeks the benefit of a government-conferred monopoly for Victoria and South Australia. This monopoly competes with a similar Western Australian monopoly and a New South Wales monopoly.

The ABB is not the Australian Wheat Board. The fact that the ABB is a private company, and not a statutory marketing authority, raises the issue of whether the Government should do another Citylink and confer a monopoly on a private company.

On the issue of the VFF poll, 4300 ballot papers were distributed, but some farmers received more than one vote. A family trust, for example, claimed 14 votes. Presumably growers in NSW and South Australia who sold to the ABB (of whom there could be up to 1000) also could have voted.

Ignoring issues such as whether farmers who grow barley on a rotational basis should be treated equally with those who grow it every year, whether those who grow limited amounts should be treated equally with those who grow thousands of tonnes, and whether those who grow feed ought to be treated equally with those who export malt, there is another issue.

Liberal agriculture spokesman Steve McArthur told Parliament there were 8000 barley growers. Consequently, barely 50 per cent of Victorian growers, at best, received a vote.

Of the 4300 ballot papers, 2330 (less than a third of growers) supported the ABB "single desk".

The ABB also said its poll showed 84 per cent for the "single desk". However, in the same poll, of growers who sold to the ABB, only 39 per cent of Mallee respondents thought the ABB got them the best price for their export grain; 61 per cent worried about whether the ABB really got farmers the best price; and only 37 per cent thought a "single desk" export facility meant the industry was more efficient.

Mr Feeney argues quality will decline. I understand 20 million tonnes of cheap, feed grade barley are traded globally every year and if buyers want low quality grain, there is plenty available. Victorian malt is in demand because of its quality, not in spite of it.

Further, I note your reference to co-operatives. May I say that co-operatives such as Rupnorth support the removal of the ABB monopoly.

Finally, when I supported the de-regulation of the export container trade, at the urging of co-operatives and growers, I was vilified by the VFF, the ABB and the Coalition.

This deregulation has not only benefited co-operatives, but also enabled the development of niche markets to which I have referred.

Russell Savage MLA,
Mildura, Vic

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am