March 31st 2012

  Buy Issue 2872

Articles from this issue:

QUEENSLAND: After the deluge: Anna Bligh's legacy

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The origins of Labor's visceral loathing of Abbott

EDITORIAL: Swan's budget surplus to depend on mining tax

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Radical green strategy to sabotage Australian coal-mines, railways and ports

CHILDHOOD: Same-sex marriage set to transform our schools


EAST TIMOR: Election swing against Gusmão government

HUMAN RIGHTS: Academics who rationalise post-natal murder

POPULATION: Seven billion reasons to celebrate

OPINION: America: Russia's Afghan catspaw

OPINION: School textbook misleads about Crusades

WEIMAR GERMANY: Why art flourished and democracy perished


DOCUMENTARY: Lifting the veil on the global sex industry
Nefarious: Merchant of Souls (96 minutes)

CINEMA: Nihilism filtered through teen angst

BOOK REVIEW Rescuing history from Christianity's detractors

BOOK REVIEW The great class divide in the United States

Books promotion page

Why art flourished and democracy perished

by Jeffry Babb

News Weekly, March 31, 2012

Weimar Germany saw an intense flowering of almost every form of creativity, yet this vibrant culture ran head first into Nazi Germany, which set out to destroy it.

The Weimar Republic was born amid chaos in the provincial city of Weimar in 1919 and died largely unmourned when the Nazis seized power in 1933.

It gained a reputation for vacillation, incompetence and weakness in the face of oppression by the victors of the Great War. It was burdened with the taint of betrayal — that the brave soldiers at the front, who after all were still on French and Belgium soil at the end of the war — had been “stabbed in the back” by the civilian government. Amazingly, the reparations demanded from Germany under the Treaty of Versailles were only finally paid off in 2010.

Three invalids (c.1930), by German artist Heinrich Hoerle (1895–1936). Private collection, courtesy of the National Gallery of Victoria.

Three invalids (c.1930),

by German artist Heinrich Hoerle (1895–1936).

Private collection,

courtesy of the National Gallery of Victoria. 

At first instance, the Weimar Republic would seem to be an unpromising environment for creativity. The three years of hyperinflation between 1921 and 1924 bankrupted the middle class and instilled an enduring fear of inflation. Tales are told of currency speculators who would drink their winnings every night because by morning their speculative gains would be worthless. A loaf of bread that cost one mark in 1921 could be bought for “only” 100 million marks in 1924.

The streets were inhabited by impoverished veterans with horrific wounds and prostitutes who traded in the drug of loneliness. The Freikorps, a paramilitary militia formed of veterans that fought sometimes for the state and sometimes against it, dealt harshly with those with whom it was displeased.

Why then was the Weimar Republic so productive in ideas and art? Because its flowering, like a hothouse plant, was so intense and short-lived, it has often been overlooked in Anglophone countries.

Berlin has frequently been overshadowed by its continental rival, Paris. Paris had “the Lost Generation” — Ernest Hemingway, Gertrude Stein and other litterateurs drinking their books away. It had Jean-Paul Sartre, and the Cubists — Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque. But with the revival of Germany as Europe’s cultural hub as well as its financier, many would argue that Paris’s pre-eminent reputation as the “between the wars” cultural capital of Europe is a triumph of publicity over substance. Berlin was the centre, but new creative movements sprang up all over Germany.

The depth and influence of Weimar culture was on show in Sydney and Melbourne recently in one of the most engrossing exhibitions in recent years, entitled “The Mad Square: Modernity in German Art, 1910–37”. Surprisingly, half the exhibits are from Australian collections.

Of the painting which lends it name to the exhibition, guest curator Jacqueline Stecker writes: “Painted during a period of intense political and intellectual polarisation, The Mad Square by Felix Nussbaum can be seen as a satirisation of the collapse of society during the years of the Weimar Republic and a forewarning of the cataclysm that was to ensue.”

Among the artistic movements which flourished in the Weimar period were Expressionism, Dada, Constructivism and New Objectivity. Of all the artistic and creative movements that thrived in the Weimar period, the one that has had the most influence on everyday life is Bauhaus. Or, as Tom Wolfe put it, “From Bauhaus to Our House.”

To understand the profound influence Bauhaus has had on architecture and design, you have only to look around you. Almost every postwar skyscraper you see in any city in Australia is pure Bauhaus. Almost every kitchen utensil you use is influenced by Bauhaus design principles. The ubiquitous steel tubing chairs are pure Bauhaus.

Bauhaus was essentially a design studio that worked from first principles. The founder, Walter Gropius, was an architect, but in the first instance Bauhaus did not teach architecture. Bauhaus was not always a winner. In fact, it inflicted some horrible buildings on the world, including what the Americans call “projects” that did so much to criminalise and pauperise the less well-off, particularly inner city African-Americans.

The whole Weimar creative enterprise was about modernism. Modernism came late to Germany. Under Chancellor Count Otto von Bismarck, the Germans gained pensions, but at the cost of their freedom. The first democratic ruler of Germany was Prince Max of Baden, whose short-lived government attempted unsuccessfully to save Germany from chaos after the fighting ceased in 1918.

The underlying theme of the modernist project — that humans are moral beings who have the power to create, improve and reshape their environment through experimentation, scientific knowledge and technology — had suffered a near fatal blow in the blood-soaked trenches, where science aided, rather than hindered, the slaughter.

The last blow for modernism was the Degenerate Art exhibition, held in Munich in 1937. Hitler’s offensive against the art of the Weimar Republic was intended to show the public that art that wasn’t Aryan was immoral and corrupt. Art was certainly intended to be revolutionary, as artists aimed to overthrow rather than enlighten. The interwar flowering of German art was dead.

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am