February 18th 2012

  Buy Issue 2869

Articles from this issue:

NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Federal Coalition commits to defending marriage

CANBERRA OBSERVED: The party that has lost its way

CLIMATE CHANGE I: Iceland data "doctored" to back global warming

CLIMATE CHANGE II: Three top scientists debunk NSW govt sea-level scare


EDITORIAL: How to address the boat people crisis

COVER STORY / DEFENCE: Australia's future in the US alliance

INDUSTRY POLICY: What will come after the mining boom?

UNITED STATES: Rick Santorum and the road to the White House

SOCIETY: Eight myths about legalising hard drugs

FAMILY: Feminism the sworn enemy of families

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: Planned Parenthood's protection racket

OPINION: The case for the European Union

CINEMA: Britain's first woman PM

BOOK REVIEW Master historian's book a delight to read

BOOK REVIEW Surviving Cambodia's killing fields

Books promotion page

Planned Parenthood's protection racket

by Babette Francis

News Weekly, February 18, 2012

In early February, pro-life organisations in the United States were rejoicing that the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation, America’s major breast cancer research organisation, had announced it would no longer give grants to Planned Parenthood, the biggest abortion-provider in the US.

This was huge news for both sides in the abortion debate. The grants had been given over years because Planned Parenthood (PP) claimed to provide breast-screening as part of its “services” to women. In reality, PP only did manual breast examinations which can be done by any doctor and at clinics which are not involved in abortion.

Professor Gerard Nadal, MD, of St John’s University, New York, wrote: “When one hears the term ‘breast screening’, one envisions a mammogram. Instead, PP’s ‘screening’ is a palpation of the breast, checking for detectable lumps. So, yes, if a lump is detected, and if the lump is cancerous, that could be life-saving. But if no lump is detected? Is the woman given a referral for a mammogram?

“It is the mammogram that is essential. A woman’s best chances at beating cancer are when the cancer is found through mammography before it is large enough to be palpated, or found through mammography in women whose breast density make it difficult to detect by palpation.

“By funding Planned Parenthood, Komen funded the abortions that lead to increased risk of breast cancer, the distribution of oral contraceptives which are well known to cause breast cancer, and the lie that women were receiving mammograms.”

Pro-life organisations had lobbied Komen for years to stop funding PP, but their rejoicing had barely started when two days later the news broke that Komen had reversed its stance and, in an ambiguously worded statement, announced it might continue to fund Planned Parenthood.

Fifty left-liberal members of US Congress signed a letter chastising Komen, called its action “troubling”; declared that the foundation’s decision was responsible for cutting “life-saving services” to women; and urged it to reconsider its decision.

But the real fatwa came from Planned Parenthood, which revealed itself willing to seriously damage and attempt to destroy the Komen foundation. It called in its feminist allies. The American Association of University Women announced it would immediately bar Komen from approved community service opportunities for college women at the AAUW’s annual leadership conference.

As far as the AAUW is concerned, volunteering to raise money to help fight breast cancer for an organisation with a 30-year history of doing just that doesn’t count as “community service”, unless Komen was prepared also to support Planned Parenthood.

Fighting breast cancer, apparently, isn’t enough. You must also fund America’s largest abortion-provider.

Planned Parenthood’s bitter campaign against Komen is analogous to a protection racket: “Nice charity you’ve got there. It’d be a shame if anything happened to it.” The none-too-subtle message to other Planned Parenthood donors is that if they don’t play nice and keep donating, they’ll get the Komen treatment.

There’s one crucial difference — in mafia-style protection rackets, the victims never pay voluntarily. The threat is present from the start, sometimes even before you begin your business after having just moved into the neighbourhood. By contrast, Komen was not under any duress when it initially made its grants — it could have avoided all this nastiness by never donating to Planned Parenthood in the first place.

You can’t stop giving to Planned Parenthood and not expect consequences. Daily Caller contributing writer Mary Katharine Ham tweeted: “Giving to Planned Parenthood is like going on a date that you can never leave, ever.”

It has been a rude awakening for anyone who didn’t know how ruthless the pro-death forces are, and how sacred abortion and its largest American seller is. In view of Komen’s life-saving research for women, PP could instead have turned its wrath on the Republicans and assorted pro-life “villains”.

But no — Komen had became an apostate and the PP fatwa was issued, “We will destroy you”, and the left-liberal media was a willing accomplice.

Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, an international women’s organisation founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer, said on America’s Fox News: “The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer applauds Susan G. Komen for the Cure for halting grants to Planned Parenthood, but remains its critic for co-operating in the abortion-breast cancer cover-up and downplaying the risk of the birth-control pill.”

In the light of the Komen foundation’s apparent reversal on grants to PP, Karen Malec’s reservations appear well founded.

Meanwhile, American pro-life identities such as Austin Ruse, president of the Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute (C-Fam), and R. Albert Mohler Jr, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, have been united in condemning Komen’s about-turn.

Pro-lifers all over the world should email Komen at <news@komen.org> and ask it to stand by its original decision to defund Planned Parenthood.

Babette Francis, B.Sc. (Hons), is national coordinator of Endeavour Forum Inc., an affiliate of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer. 

Join email list

Join e-newsletter list

Your cart has 0 items

Subscribe to NewsWeekly

Research Papers

Trending articles

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Memo to Shorten, Wong: LGBTIs don't want it

COVER STORY Shorten takes low road to defeat marriage plebiscite

COVER STORY Reaper mows down first child in the Low Countries

COVER STORY Bill Shorten imposes his political will on the nation

SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Kevin Andrews: defend marriage on principles

CANBERRA OBSERVED Coalition still gridlocked despite foreign success

ENVIRONMENT More pseudo science from climate

News and views from around the world

Menzies, myth and modern Australia (Jonathan Pincus)

China’s utterly disgraceful human-rights record

Japan’s cure for childlessness: a robot (Marcus Roberts)

SOGI laws: a subversive response to a non-existent problem (James Gottry)

Shakespeare, Cervantes and the romance of the real (R.V. Young)

That’s not funny: PC and humour (Anthony Sacramone)

Refugees celebrate capture of terror suspect

The Spectre of soft totalitarianism (Daniel Mahoney)

American dream more dead than you thought (Eric Levitz)

Think the world is overcrowded: These 10 maps show why you’re wrong (Max Galka)

© Copyright NewsWeekly.com.au 2011
Last Modified:
November 14, 2015, 11:18 am